Alison B Singer1, Mary S Wolff2, Manori J Silva3, Antonia M Calafat3, Stephanie M Engel4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: alison_singer@unc.edu. 2. Department of Community and Preventative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 3. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Gestational phthalate exposures have been adversely associated with attention, externalizing, and internalizing behaviors in childhood. Early childhood temperament may be a marker of later behavioral patterns. We therefore sought to determine whether gestational phthalate exposures were associated with infant and toddler temperament. METHODS: The Mount Sinai Children's Environmental Health Study is a prospective cohort study of children born between May 1998 and July 2001 in New York City (N=404). Phthalate metabolites were measured in spot urine samples collected from pregnant women in their third trimester. Child temperament was assessed by parental report at 12-months using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ) (N=204) and at 24-months using the Toddler Behavior Assessment Questionnaire (TBAQ) (N=279). We used multiple linear regression to evaluate associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and eleven temperament domains. RESULTS: Phthalate biomarker concentrations were weakly associated with lower gross motor activity levels as well as higher duration of orienting at the 12-month assessment. Mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) and the sum of metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (∑DEHP) were associated with lower levels of smiling and laughing at 12 months. At 24-months, social fear and lower pleasure was linked to higher concentrations of MCPP and MBzP, and higher ∑DEHP was weakly associated with increased anger levels at 24-months. CONCLUSIONS: Though we observed some weak associations between biomarkers of prenatal exposure to phthalates and temperament at 12- and 24-months, overall phthalates biomarkers were not strongly associated with alterations in temperament.
INTRODUCTION: Gestational phthalate exposures have been adversely associated with attention, externalizing, and internalizing behaviors in childhood. Early childhood temperament may be a marker of later behavioral patterns. We therefore sought to determine whether gestational phthalate exposures were associated with infant and toddler temperament. METHODS: The Mount Sinai Children's Environmental Health Study is a prospective cohort study of children born between May 1998 and July 2001 in New York City (N=404). Phthalate metabolites were measured in spot urine samples collected from pregnant women in their third trimester. Child temperament was assessed by parental report at 12-months using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ) (N=204) and at 24-months using the Toddler Behavior Assessment Questionnaire (TBAQ) (N=279). We used multiple linear regression to evaluate associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and eleven temperament domains. RESULTS:Phthalate biomarker concentrations were weakly associated with lower gross motor activity levels as well as higher duration of orienting at the 12-month assessment. Mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) and the sum of metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (∑DEHP) were associated with lower levels of smiling and laughing at 12 months. At 24-months, social fear and lower pleasure was linked to higher concentrations of MCPP and MBzP, and higher ∑DEHP was weakly associated with increased anger levels at 24-months. CONCLUSIONS: Though we observed some weak associations between biomarkers of prenatal exposure to phthalates and temperament at 12- and 24-months, overall phthalates biomarkers were not strongly associated with alterations in temperament.
Authors: Hermann Fromme; Gabriele Bolte; Holger M Koch; Jürgen Angerer; Sigrun Boehmer; Hans Drexler; Richard Mayer; Bernhard Liebl Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Pauline W Jansen; Hein Raat; Johan P Mackenbach; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Frank C Verhulst; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2008-07-28 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: David E Cantonwine; José F Cordero; Luis O Rivera-González; Liza V Anzalota Del Toro; Kelly K Ferguson; Bhramar Mukherjee; Antonia M Calafat; Noe Crespo; Braulio Jiménez-Vélez; Ingrid Y Padilla; Akram N Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Int Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: James L Preau; Lee-Yang Wong; Manori J Silva; Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Mary S Wolff; Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Chenbo Zhu; James Wetmur; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Joseph M Braun; Amy E Kalkbrenner; Allan C Just; Kimberly Yolton; Antonia M Calafat; Andreas Sjödin; Russ Hauser; Glenys M Webster; Aimin Chen; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Giehae Choi; Gro D Villanger; Samantha S M Drover; Amrit K Sakhi; Cathrine Thomsen; Rachel C Nethery; Pål Zeiner; Gun Peggy Knudsen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Kristin R Øvergaard; Amy H Herring; Annette H Skogan; Guido Biele; Heidi Aase; Stephanie M Engel Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Agnieszka Jankowska; Linda Nazareth; Dorota Kaleta; Kinga Polanska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.390