Daniel F Gros1, Cynthia L Lancaster2, Michael David Horner2, Derek D Szafranski2, Sudie E Back2. 1. Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States. Electronic address: grosd@musc.edu. 2. Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance use disorders (SUD), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) in veterans of Operations Enduring/Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn has received much attention in the literature. Although hypotheses have been presented and disseminated that TBI history will negatively influence treatment response, little data exist to support these claims. The present study investigates the influence of TBI history on response to COPE (Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and SUD Using Prolonged Exposure), a 12-session, integrated psychotherapy designed to address co-occurring PTSD and SUD. METHOD: Participants were 51 veterans with current PTSD and SUD enrolled in a clinical trial examining COPE. Assessments of PTSD symptoms, substance use, and depression were collected at baseline and each treatment session. A TBI measure was used to dichotomize veterans into groups with and without a history of TBI (ns=30 and 21, respectively). RESULTS: Participants with and without TBI history demonstrated significant improvements in PTSD and depression symptoms during the course of treatment. However, participants with TBI history experienced less improvement relative to participants without TBI history. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that, although patients with a TBI history respond to treatment, their response to treatment was less so than that observed in patients without a TBI history. As such, identification, symptom monitoring, and treatment practices may require alteration and further special consideration in individuals with PTSD, SUD and TBI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance use disorders (SUD), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) in veterans of Operations Enduring/Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn has received much attention in the literature. Although hypotheses have been presented and disseminated that TBI history will negatively influence treatment response, little data exist to support these claims. The present study investigates the influence of TBI history on response to COPE (Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and SUD Using Prolonged Exposure), a 12-session, integrated psychotherapy designed to address co-occurring PTSD and SUD. METHOD:Participants were 51 veterans with current PTSD and SUD enrolled in a clinical trial examining COPE. Assessments of PTSD symptoms, substance use, and depression were collected at baseline and each treatment session. A TBI measure was used to dichotomize veterans into groups with and without a history of TBI (ns=30 and 21, respectively). RESULTS:Participants with and without TBI history demonstrated significant improvements in PTSD and depression symptoms during the course of treatment. However, participants with TBI history experienced less improvement relative to participants without TBI history. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that, although patients with a TBI history respond to treatment, their response to treatment was less so than that observed in patients without a TBI history. As such, identification, symptom monitoring, and treatment practices may require alteration and further special consideration in individuals with PTSD, SUD and TBI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Rebecca K Sripada; Sheila A M Rauch; Peter W Tuerk; Erin Smith; Andrew M Defever; Rebecca A Mayer; Michael Messina; Margaret Venners Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2013-05-20
Authors: Martin L Rohling; Laurence M Binder; George J Demakis; Glenn J Larrabee; Danielle M Ploetz; Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Kathryn R Marshall; Sherray L Holland; Kimberly S Meyer; Elisabeth Moy Martin; Michael Wilmore; Jamie B Grimes Journal: Mil Med Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Kathleen T Brady; Peter Tuerk; Sudie E Back; Michael E Saladin; Angela E Waldrop; Hugh Myrick Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Eleanor Boyle; Carol Cancelliere; Jan Hartvigsen; Linda J Carroll; Lena W Holm; J David Cassidy Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jared A Rowland; Jennifer R Stapleton-Kotloski; Sarah L Martindale; Emily E Rogers; Anna S Ord; Dwayne W Godwin; Katherine H Taber Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Francesca Gimigliano; Vanessa M Young; Chiara Arienti; Silvia Bargeri; Greta Castellini; Silvia Gianola; Stefano G Lazzarini; Antimo Moretti; Allen W Heinemann; Stefano Negrini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: J Cobb Scott; Kevin G Lynch; David P Cenkner; Shannon M Kehle-Forbes; Melissa A Polusny; Ruben C Gur; Shirley Chen; Edna B Foa; David W Oslin Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2021-11