Literature DB >> 28802754

Cost-benefit analyses of supplementary measles immunisation in the highly immunized population of New Zealand.

D T S Hayman1, J C Marshall2, N P French2, T E Carpenter3, M G Roberts4, T Kiedrzynski5.   

Abstract

As endemic measles is eliminated from countries through increased immunisation, the economic benefits of enhanced immunisation programs may come into question. New Zealand has suffered from outbreaks after measles introductions from abroad and we use it as a model system to understand the benefits of catch up immunisation in highly immunised populations. We provide cost-benefit analyses for measles supplementary immunisation in New Zealand. We model outbreaks based on estimates of the basic reproduction number in the vaccinated population (Rv, the number of secondary infections in a partially immunised population), based on the number of immunologically-naïve people at district and national levels, considering both pre- and post-catch up vaccination scenarios. Our analyses suggest that measles Rv often includes or exceeds one (0.18-3.92) despite high levels of population immunity. We calculate the cost of the first 187 confirmed and probable measles cases in 2014 to be over NZ$1 million (∼US$864,200) due to earnings lost, case management and hospitalization costs. The benefit-cost ratio analyses suggest additional vaccination beyond routine childhood immunisation is economically efficient. Supplemental vaccination-related costs are required to exceed approximately US$66 to US$1877 per person, depending on different scenarios, before supplemental vaccination is economically inefficient. Thus, our analysis suggests additional immunisation beyond childhood programs to target naïve individuals is economically beneficial even when childhood immunisation rates are high.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic reproduction number; Cost-benefit analyses; Immunisation; MMR; Measles; Vaccine programs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28802754     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  Measles lessons in an anti-vaccination era: public health is a social duty, not a political option.

Authors:  L Lancella; C Di Camillo; A C Vittucci; E Boccuzzi; E Bozzola; A Villani
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 2.  Economic evaluations and their use in infection prevention and control: a narrative review.

Authors:  Elissa Rennert-May; John Conly; Jenine Leal; Stephanie Smith; Braden Manns
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.887

3.  Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination: a comparative analysis of eight approaches for valuing changes to mortality and morbidity risks.

Authors:  Minah Park; Mark Jit; Joseph T Wu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 8.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.