Point mutations in the TERT gene promoter occur at high frequency in multiple cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the relationship between TERT promoter mutations and UC patient outcomes is unclear due to conflicting reports in the literature. In this study, we examined the association of TERT alterations, tumor mutational burden per megabase (Mb), and copy number alteration (CNA) burden with clinical parameters and their prognostic value in a cohort of 398 urothelial tumors. The majority of TERT mutations were located at two promoter region hotspots (chromosome 5, 1 295 228 C>T and 1 295 250 C>T). TERT alterations were more frequently present in bladder tumors than in upper tract tumors (73% vs 53%; p=0.001). ARID1A, PIK3CA, RB1, ERCC2, ERBB2, TSC1, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and PTPRD alterations showed significant co-occurrence with TERT alterations (all p<0.0025). TERT alterations and the mutational burden/Mb were independently associated with overall survival (hazard ratio[HR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-3.65; p<0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p=0.002), disease-specific survival (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.41-3.53; p<0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p=0.002), and metastasis-free survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.53; p=0.029; and HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; p=0.063) in multivariate models. PATIENT SUMMARY: The majority of TERT gene mutations that we detected in urothelial carcinoma are located at two promoter hotspots. Urothelial tumors with TERT alterations had worse prognosis compared to tumors without TERT alterations, whereas tumors with a higher mutational burden had more favorable outcome compared to tumors with low mutational burden.
Point mutations in the TERT gene promoter occur at high frequency in multiple cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the relationship between TERT promoter mutations and UC patient outcomes is unclear due to conflicting reports in the literature. In this study, we examined the association of TERT alterations, tumor mutational burden per megabase (Mb), and copy number alteration (CNA) burden with clinical parameters and their prognostic value in a cohort of 398 urothelial tumors. The majority of TERT mutations were located at two promoter region hotspots (chromosome 5, 1 295 228 C>T and 1 295 250 C>T). TERT alterations were more frequently present in bladder tumors than in upper tract tumors (73% vs 53%; p=0.001). ARID1A, PIK3CA, RB1, ERCC2, ERBB2, TSC1, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and PTPRD alterations showed significant co-occurrence with TERT alterations (all p<0.0025). TERT alterations and the mutational burden/Mb were independently associated with overall survival (hazard ratio[HR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-3.65; p<0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p=0.002), disease-specific survival (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.41-3.53; p<0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p=0.002), and metastasis-free survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.53; p=0.029; and HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; p=0.063) in multivariate models. PATIENT SUMMARY: The majority of TERT gene mutations that we detected in urothelial carcinoma are located at two promoter hotspots. Urothelial tumors with TERT alterations had worse prognosis compared to tumors without TERT alterations, whereas tumors with a higher mutational burden had more favorable outcome compared to tumors with low mutational burden.
Authors: Sumit Borah; Linghe Xi; Arthur J Zaug; Natasha M Powell; Garrett M Dancik; Scott B Cohen; James C Costello; Dan Theodorescu; Thomas R Cech Journal: Science Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yves Allory; Willemien Beukers; Ana Sagrera; Marta Flández; Miriam Marqués; Mirari Márquez; Kirstin A van der Keur; Lars Dyrskjot; Irene Lurkin; Marcel Vermeij; Alfredo Carrato; Josep Lloreta; José A Lorente; Enrique Carrillo-de Santa Pau; Roy G Masius; Manolis Kogevinas; Ewout W Steyerberg; Angela A G van Tilborg; Cheno Abas; Torben F Orntoft; Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; Núria Malats; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Francisco X Real Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-09-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Christopher M Heaphy; Roeland F de Wilde; Yuchen Jiao; Alison P Klein; Barish H Edil; Chanjuan Shi; Chetan Bettegowda; Fausto J Rodriguez; Charles G Eberhart; Sachidanand Hebbar; G Johan Offerhaus; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Yiping He; Hai Yan; Darell D Bigner; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Gregory J Riggins; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Alan K Meeker Journal: Science Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Donavan T Cheng; Talia N Mitchell; Ahmet Zehir; Ronak H Shah; Ryma Benayed; Aijazuddin Syed; Raghu Chandramohan; Zhen Yu Liu; Helen H Won; Sasinya N Scott; A Rose Brannon; Catherine O'Reilly; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Angela Yannes; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Jinjuan Yao; Wei Song; Dara S Ross; Alifya Oultache; Snjezana Dogan; Laetitia Borsu; Meera Hameed; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patrick J Killela; Zachary J Reitman; Yuchen Jiao; Chetan Bettegowda; Nishant Agrawal; Luis A Diaz; Allan H Friedman; Henry Friedman; Gary L Gallia; Beppino C Giovanella; Arthur P Grollman; Tong-Chuan He; Yiping He; Ralph H Hruban; George I Jallo; Nils Mandahl; Alan K Meeker; Fredrik Mertens; George J Netto; B Ahmed Rasheed; Gregory J Riggins; Thomas A Rosenquist; Mark Schiffman; Ie-Ming Shih; Dan Theodorescu; Michael S Torbenson; Victor E Velculescu; Tian-Li Wang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Laura D Wood; Ming Zhang; Roger E McLendon; Darell D Bigner; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Hai Yan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gopa Iyer; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Nikolaus Schultz; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Irina Ostrovnaya; Arjun V Balar; Philip H Kim; Oscar Lin; Nils Weinhold; Chris Sander; Emily C Zabor; Manickam Janakiraman; Ilana R Garcia-Grossman; Adriana Heguy; Agnes Viale; Bernard H Bochner; Victor E Reuter; Dean F Bajorin; Matthew I Milowsky; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corey M Gill; Joshua Loewenstern; John W Rutland; Hanane Arib; Margaret Pain; Melissa Umphlett; Yayoi Kinoshita; Russell B McBride; Joshua Bederson; Michael Donovan; Robert Sebra; Mary Fowkes; Raj K Shrivastava Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Ivan de Kouchkovsky; Li Zhang; Errol J Philip; Francis Wright; Daniel M Kim; Divya Natesan; Daniel Kwon; Hansen Ho; Son Ho; Emily Chan; Sima P Porten; Anthony C Wong; Arpita Desai; Franklin W Huang; Jonathan Chou; David Y Oh; Raj S Pruthi; Lawrence Fong; Eric J Small; Terence W Friedlander; Vadim S Koshkin Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Ilaria J Russo; Yongwon Ju; Naheema S Gordon; Maurice P Zeegers; K K Cheng; Nicholas D James; Richard T Bryan; Douglas G Ward Journal: Bladder Cancer Date: 2018-01-20
Authors: Joyce M Chen; G Kenneth Haines; William Lam; Asha Reddy; Meenakshi Mehrotra; Jane Houldsworth; Qiusheng Si Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 2.644