Literature DB >> 28802365

Exploring reasons for late identification of children with early-onset hearing loss.

Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick1, Johnny Cesconetto Dos Santos2, Viviane Grandpierre3, JoAnne Whittingham4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that early identification of childhood hearing loss leads to better language outcomes. However, delays in the confirmation of hearing loss persist even in the presence of well-established universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). The objective of this population-based study was to document the proportion of children who experienced delayed confirmation of congenital and early onset hearing loss in a UNHS program in one region of Canada. The study also sought to determine the reasons for delayed confirmation of hearing loss in children.
METHODS: Population level data related to age of first assessment, age of identification and clinical characteristics were collected prospectively for all children identified through the UNHS program. We documented the number of children who experienced delay (defined as more than 3 months) from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of hearing loss. A detailed chart review was subsequently performed to examine the reasons for delay to confirmation.
RESULTS: Of 418 children identified from 2003 to 2013, 182 (43.5%) presented with congenital or early onset hearing loss, of whom 30 (16.5%) experienced more than 3 months delay from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of their hearing disorder. The median age of first assessment and confirmation of hearing loss for these 30 children was 3.7 months (IQR: 2.0, 7.6) and 13.8 months (IQR: 9.7, 26.1) respectively. Close examination of the factors related to delay to confirmation revealed that for the overwhelming majority of children, a constellation of factors contributed to late diagnosis. Several children (n = 22; 73.3%) presented with developmental/medical issues, 15 of whom also had middle ear dysfunction at assessment, and 9 of whom had documented family follow-up concerns. For the remaining eight children, additional reasons included ongoing middle ear dysfunction for five children, complicated by family follow-up concerns (n = 3) and mild hearing loss (n = 1) and the remaining three children had isolated reasons related to family follow-up (n = 1) or mild hearing loss (n = 2).
CONCLUSION: Despite the progress made in the early detection of pediatric hearing loss since UNHS, a substantial number of children referred for early assessment can experience late confirmation and intervention. In particular, infants with developmental and/or medical issues including middle ear disorders are at particular risk for longer time to confirmation of hearing loss.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Congenital hearing loss; Delayed diagnosis; Early detection; Early-onset hearing loss; Newborn screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28802365     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  3 in total

1.  [Follow-up II of newborn hearing screening : Evaluation of a follow-up II facility after implementation of newborn hearing screening in Germany].

Authors:  Nicola Fink; Almut Goeze; Eugen Zaretsky; Anna Fink; Katrin Reimann; Christiane Hey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Profound Hearing Loss: Addressing Barriers to Hearing Healthcare.

Authors:  Sheila R Pratt
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Alteration of Cortical and Subcortical Structures in Children With Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Hang Qu; Hui Tang; Jiahao Pan; Yi Zhao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.