Literature DB >> 28802170

Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure.

L Morawska1, G A Ayoko2, G N Bae3, G Buonanno4, C Y H Chao5, S Clifford6, S C Fu5, O Hänninen7, C He2, C Isaxon8, M Mazaheri2, T Salthammer9, M S Waring10, A Wierzbicka8.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the exposure to airborne particulate matter is one of the most significant environmental risks people face. Since indoor environment is where people spend the majority of time, in order to protect against this risk, the origin of the particles needs to be understood: do they come from indoor, outdoor sources or both? Further, this question needs to be answered separately for each of the PM mass/number size fractions, as they originate from different sources. Numerous studies have been conducted for specific indoor environments or under specific setting. Here our aim was to go beyond the specifics of individual studies, and to explore, based on pooled data from the literature, whether there are generalizable trends in routes of exposure at homes, schools and day cares, offices and aged care facilities. To do this, we quantified the overall 24h and occupancy weighted means of PM10, PM2.5 and PN - particle number concentration. Based on this, we developed a summary of the indoor versus outdoor origin of indoor particles and compared the means to the WHO guidelines (for PM10 and PM2.5) and to the typical levels reported for urban environments (PN). We showed that the main origins of particle metrics differ from one type of indoor environment to another. For homes, outdoor air is the main origin of PM10 and PM2.5 but PN originate from indoor sources; for schools and day cares, outdoor air is the source of PN while PM10 and PM2.5 have indoor sources; and for offices, outdoor air is the source of all three particle size fractions. While each individual building is different, leading to differences in exposure and ideally necessitating its own assessment (which is very rarely done), our findings point to the existence of generalizable trends for the main types of indoor environments where people spend time, and therefore to the type of prevention measures which need to be considered in general for these environments.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged care indoor particles; Child care indoor particles; Home indoor particles; Indoor aerosols; Indoor particulate matter; Indoor ultrafine particles; Office indoor particles; School indoor particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28802170     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  22 in total

1.  Effects of Home Particulate Air Filtration on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dalia Walzer; Terry Gordon; Lorna Thorpe; George Thurston; Yuhe Xia; Hua Zhong; Timothy R Roberts; Judith S Hochman; Jonathan D Newman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Impacts of electronic cigarettes usage on air quality of vape shops and their nearby areas.

Authors:  Liqiao Li; Charlene Nguyen; Yan Lin; Yuening Guo; Nour Abou Fadel; Yifang Zhu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Indoor particle dynamics in a school office: determination of particle concentrations, deposition rates and penetration factors under naturally ventilated conditions.

Authors:  X C Cong; J J Zhao; Z Jing; Q G Wang; P F Ni
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  The dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity with changes in aerosol microenvironment.

Authors:  Henry P Oswin; Allen E Haddrell; Mara Otero-Fernandez; Jamie F S Mann; Tristan A Cogan; Thomas G Hilditch; Jianghan Tian; Daniel A Hardy; Darryl J Hill; Adam Finn; Andrew D Davidson; Jonathan P Reid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Characteristics and health risks of personal exposure to particle-bound PAHs for Hong Kong adult residents: From ambient pollution to indoor exposure.

Authors:  Xiao-Cui Chen; Tony J Ward; Kin-Fai Ho; Chinmoy Sarkar; Chris Webster
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 6.554

6.  Associations Between the Breakroom Built Environment, Worker Health Habits, and Worker Health Outcomes: A Pilot Study Among Public Transit Rail Operators.

Authors:  Nathan M Jones; Meghan McDonnell; Emily Sparer-Fine; Bernard Rosner; Jack T Dennerlein; Stefanos Kales; Carmen Messerlian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.306

Review 7.  Effects of Electronic Cigarettes on Indoor Air Quality and Health.

Authors:  Liqiao Li; Yan Lin; Tian Xia; Yifang Zhu
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Prevalence and antibiogram of coagulase negative Staphylococci in bioaerosols from different indoors of a university in India.

Authors:  Himani Kumari; Trina Chakraborti; Madhuri Singh; Maneet Kumar Chakrawarti; Kasturi Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  The Association between Indoor Air Quality and Adult Blood Pressure Levels in a High-Income Setting.

Authors:  Krassi Rumchev; Mario Soares; Yun Zhao; Christopher Reid; Rachel Huxley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Healthy Indoor Environments: The Need for a Holistic Approach.

Authors:  Aneta Wierzbicka; Eja Pedersen; Roger Persson; Birgitta Nordquist; Kristian Stålne; Chuansi Gao; Lars-Erik Harderup; Jonas Borell; Héctor Caltenco; Barry Ness; Emilie Stroh; Yujing Li; Mats Dahlblom; Karin Lundgren-Kownacki; Christina Isaxon; Anders Gudmundsson; Pawel Wargocki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.