Literature DB >> 28801947

How will transitioning from cytology to HPV testing change the balance between the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening? Estimates of the impact on cervical cancer, treatment rates and adverse obstetric outcomes in Australia, a high vaccination coverage country.

Louiza S Velentzis1,2, Michael Caruana1, Kate T Simms1, Jie-Bin Lew1, Ju-Fang Shi3, Marion Saville4,5, Megan A Smith1,6, Sarah J Lord7,8, Jeffrey Tan5,9, Deborah Bateson10,11, Michael Quinn12, Karen Canfell1,6,13.   

Abstract

Primary HPV screening enables earlier diagnosis of cervical lesions compared to cytology, however, its effect on the risk of treatment and adverse obstetric outcomes has not been extensively investigated. We estimated the cumulative lifetime risk (CLR) of cervical cancer and excisional treatment, and change in adverse obstetric outcomes in HPV unvaccinated women and cohorts offered vaccination (>70% coverage in 12-13 years) for the Australian cervical screening program. Two-yearly cytology screening (ages 18-69 years) was compared to 5-yearly primary HPV screening with partial genotyping for HPV16/18 (ages 25-74 years). A dynamic model of HPV transmission, vaccination, cervical screening and treatment for precancerous lesions was coupled with an individual-based simulation of obstetric complications. For cytology screening, the CLR of cervical cancer diagnosis, death and treatment was estimated to be 0.649%, 0.198% and 13.4% without vaccination and 0.182%, 0.056% and 6.8%, in vaccinated women, respectively. For HPV screening, relative reductions of 33% and 22% in cancer risk for unvaccinated and vaccinated women are predicted, respectively, compared to cytology. Without the implementation of vaccination, a 4% increase in treatment risk for HPV versus cytology screening would have been expected, implying a possible increase in pre-term delivery (PTD) and low birth weight (LBW) events of 19 to 35 and 14 to 37, respectively, per 100,000 unvaccinated women. However, in vaccinated women, treatment risk will decrease by 13%, potentially leading to 4 to 41 fewer PTD events and from 2 more to 52 fewer LBW events per 100,000 vaccinated women. In unvaccinated women in cohorts offered vaccination as 12-13 year olds, no change to lifetime treatment risk is expected with HPV screening. In unvaccinated women in cohorts offered vaccination as 12-13 year olds, no change to lifetime treatment risk is expected with HPV screening. HPV screening starting at age 25 in populations with high vaccination coverage, is therefore expected to both improve the benefits (further decrease risk of cervical cancer) and reduce the harms (reduce treatments and possible obstetric complications) associated with cervical cancer screening.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV testing; cervical screening; excisional treatment; low birth weight; obstetric outcomes; pre-term delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28801947     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

1.  Automated Cervical Screening and Triage, Based on HPV Testing and Computer-Interpreted Cytology.

Authors:  Kai Yu; Noorie Hyun; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Han Zhang; Robin E Stamps; Nancy E Poitras; William Wheeler; Brian Befano; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  The impact of HPV vaccination beyond cancer prevention: effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Susan Yuill; Louiza S Velentzis; Megan Smith; Sam Egger; C David Wrede; Deborah Bateson; Marc Arbyn; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 4.526

3.  HPV sampling options for cervical cancer screening: preferences of urban-dwelling Canadians in a changing paradigm.

Authors:  G D Datta; M H Mayrand; S Qureshi; N Ferre; L Gauvin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  The Differential Risk of Cervical Cancer in HPV-Vaccinated and -Unvaccinated Women: A Mathematical Modeling Study.

Authors:  Emi Naslazi; Jan A C Hontelez; Steffie K Naber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.

Authors:  Satomi Aoyama-Kikawa; Hiromasa Fujita; Sharon J B Hanley; Mitsunori Kasamo; Kokichi Kikuchi; Toshihiko Torigoe; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Akiko Tamakoshi; Takayuki Sasaki; Motoki Matsuura; Yasuhito Kato; Peixin Dong; Hidemichi Watari; Tsuyoshi Saito; Kazuo Sengoku; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical screening based on first year results in the Netherlands: a modelling study.

Authors:  Eel Jansen; S K Naber; C A Aitken; H J de Koning; M van Ballegooijen; Imcm de Kok
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Use of extended HR-HPV Genotyping in improving the Triage Strategy of 2019 ASCCP recommendations in Women with positive HR-HPV diagnosis and Simultaneous LSIL Cytology Results.

Authors:  Huifeng Xue; Hangjing Gao; Jinwen Zheng; Yaojia Chen; Jiancui Chen; Diling Pan; Binhua Dong; Pengming Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Real-world data on cervical cancer risk stratification by cytology and HPV genotype to inform the management of HPV-positive women in routine cervical screening.

Authors:  Dana Hashim; Birgit Engesæter; Gry Baadstrand Skare; Philip E Castle; Tone Bjørge; Ameli Tropé; Mari Nygård
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.

Authors:  Heling Bao; Xiaorong Sun; Yi Zhang; Baochuan Pang; Hua Li; Liang Zhou; Fengpin Wu; Dehua Cao; Jian Wang; Bojana Turic; Linhong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Gaps and opportunities for cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care: evidence from midterm review of the Zimbabwe cervical Cancer prevention and control strategy (2016-2020).

Authors:  Oscar Tapera; Anna M Nyakabau; Ndabaningi Simango; Bothwell T Guzha; Shamiso Jombo-Nyakuwa; Eunice Takawira; Angeline Mapanga; Davidzoyashe Makosa; Bernard Madzima
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.