Literature DB >> 2880161

Double-blind multicentre comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

E C Klinkenberg-Knol, J M Jansen, H P Festen, S G Meuwissen, C B Lamers.   

Abstract

Omeprazole 60 mg once daily was compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in an endoscopically-controlled, double-blind randomised trial in 51 outpatients with erosive or ulcerative reflux oesophagitis (grade 2 or 3). Endoscopy was repeated after 4 weeks and, in the absence of healing, again after 8 weeks. Symptoms were assessed before entry and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Patients who were unhealed after 8 weeks were blindly switched to the other drug and treatment was continued for another 4 to 8 weeks. The healing rate (change to grade 0 or 1 oesophagitis) after 4 weeks was 19 of 25 patients treated with omeprazole and 7 of 26 patients treated with ranitidine (p = 0.002). The corresponding figures after 8 weeks were 22 of 25 and 10 of 26 (p = 0.001). The higher healing rate with omeprazole was reflected in a significantly faster and stronger improvement of reflux symptoms. 13 patients, who were unhealed after 8 weeks on ranitidine, were healed after switching treatment. Healing was achieved in 1 of 3 patients who were switched to ranitidine. There were no adverse events or changes in laboratory variables of clinical importance. Omeprazole is superior to ranitidine in the short-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2880161     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91726-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  63 in total

1.  What is heartburn worth? A cost-utility analysis of management strategies.

Authors:  G R Heudebert; R M Centor; J C Klapow; R Marks; L Johnson; C M Wilcox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Pharmacokinetic study of omeprazole in elderly healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S Landahl; T Andersson; M Larsson; B Lernfeldt; P Lundborg; C G Regårdh; E Sixt; I Skånberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Influence of acid secretory status on absorption of omeprazole from enteric coated granules.

Authors:  T Andersson; R Bergstrand; C Cederberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Lack of effect of omeprazole treatment on steady-state plasma levels of metoprolol.

Authors:  T Andersson; P Lundborg; C G Regårdh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Acid suppression: how much is needed?

Authors:  D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

6.  Clinical characteristics and effectiveness of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Hiroto Miwa; Katsuyuki Sanada; Koji Miyata; Ken Haruma
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 7.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of omeprazole after single and repeated oral administration in healthy subjects.

Authors:  T Andersson; K Andrén; C Cederberg; P O Lagerström; P Lundborg; I Skånberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  S M Grant; H D Langtry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Duodenogastric reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  J P Waring; J Legrand; A Chinichian; R A Sanowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.