Literature DB >> 28800501

Learning effects of dynamic postural control by auditory biofeedback versus visual biofeedback training.

Naoya Hasegawa1, Kenta Takeda2, Moe Sakuma2, Hiroki Mani3, Hiroshi Maejima3, Tadayoshi Asaka4.   

Abstract

Augmented sensory biofeedback (BF) for postural control is widely used to improve postural stability. However, the effective sensory information in BF systems of motor learning for postural control is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of visual versus auditory BF training in dynamic postural control. Eighteen healthy young adults were randomly divided into two groups (visual BF and auditory BF). In test sessions, participants were asked to bring the real-time center of pressure (COP) in line with a hidden target by body sway in the sagittal plane. The target moved in seven cycles of sine curves at 0.23Hz in the vertical direction on a monitor. In training sessions, the visual and auditory BF groups were required to change the magnitude of a visual circle and a sound, respectively, according to the distance between the COP and target in order to reach the target. The perceptual magnitudes of visual and auditory BF were equalized according to Stevens' power law. At the retention test, the auditory but not visual BF group demonstrated decreased postural performance errors in both the spatial and temporal parameters under the no-feedback condition. These findings suggest that visual BF increases the dependence on visual information to control postural performance, while auditory BF may enhance the integration of the proprioceptive sensory system, which contributes to motor learning without BF. These results suggest that auditory BF training improves motor learning of dynamic postural control.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory biofeedback; Body sway; Center of pressure; Postural control; Visual biofeedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800501     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Audio, Visual, or Audiovisual Gait Biofeedback on Propulsive Force Generation in Able-Bodied and Post-stroke Individuals.

Authors:  Justin Liu; Hyun Bin Kim; Steven L Wolf; Trisha M Kesar
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2020-09

Review 2.  Review of Real-Time Biomechanical Feedback Systems in Sport and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matevž Hribernik; Anton Umek; Sašo Tomažič; Anton Kos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Impact of Visual Biofeedback of Trunk Sway Smoothness on Motor Learning during Unipedal Stance.

Authors:  Carlos Cruz-Montecinos; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas; Cristian Muñoz; Dante Flores; Joseph Ellsworth; Carlos De la Fuente; Joaquín Calatayud; Gonzalo Rivera-Lillo; Verónica Soto-Arellano; Claudio Tapia; Xavier García-Massó
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.