Literature DB >> 28800341

Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Han Gil Seo1, Woo Hyung Lee1,2, Seung Hak Lee1, Youbin Yi3, Kwang Dong Kim4, Byung-Mo Oh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is becoming a standard method in stroke rehabilitation, its effect on chronic stroke patients is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances the effect of RAGT on functional ambulation in chronic stroke patients.
METHODS: Chronic hemiplegic stroke patients with a Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score≤4 were randomly assigned to either the RAGT with anodal tDCS (Anodal) group the sham tDCS (Sham) group. The patients were provided with RAGT for 45 min after allocated tDCS on the leg motor cortex in the impaired hemisphere for 20 min every weekday for 2 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the FAC, and the secondary outcome measures included 10-m walking test, 6-min walking test, Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower extremity, Medical Research Council Scale, and motor-evoked potential (MEP) parameters. They were evaluated before treatment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), and 4 weeks after the end of treatment (T2).
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were finally included. The percentage of participants who achieved improvement in the FAC score was greater in the Anodal group than in the Sham group, and the difference was significant at T2 (66.7% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.024). In secondary outcome measures, the Anodal group showed greater improvement in the 6-min walking test than the Sham group at T2 (56.49±38.87 vs. 23.59±17.00, p = 0.038). The changes in the MEP parameters were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggested that anodal tDCS on the leg motor cortex in the impaired hemisphere may facilitate the effect of RAGT on functional ambulation in chronic stroke patients. Larger clinical trials will be needed to confirm the effect of RAGT combined with tDCS in chronic stroke patients based on the present study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; gait; robotics; stroke rehabilitation; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800341     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-170745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  19 in total

1.  A wearable resistive robot facilitates locomotor adaptations during gait.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Combining Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Federica Bressi; Alex Martino Cinnera; Giovanni Morone; Benedetta Campagnola; Laura Cricenti; Fabio Santacaterina; Sandra Miccinilli; Loredana Zollo; Stefano Paolucci; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Silvia Sterzi; Marco Bravi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Nervous system modulation through electrical stimulation in companion animals.

Authors:  Ângela Martins; Débora Gouveia; Ana Cardoso; Óscar Gamboa; Darryl Millis; António Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Breaking the ice to improve motor outcomes in patients with chronic stroke: a retrospective clinical study on neuromodulation plus robotics.

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Luana Billeri; Alfredo Manuli; Tina Balletta; Antonino Cannavò; Simona Portaro; Paola Lauria; Fabrizio Ciappina; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Sandra Carvalho; Jorge Leite; Marcel Simis; Jerome Brunelin; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios; Paola Marangolo; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Daniel San-Juan; Wolnei Caumo; Marom Bikson; André R Brunoni
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.176

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-11

7.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on locomotion and balance in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Geiger; A Supiot; R Zory; P Aegerter; D Pradon; N Roche
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Combining transcranial direct-current stimulation with gait training in patients with neurological disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rubén Hernández de Paz; Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Soraya Pérez-Nombela; Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban; Juan Avendaño-Coy; Julio Gómez-Soriano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Cortical priming strategies for gait training after stroke: a controlled, stratified trial.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Brice T Cleland; Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Sally Freels; Hyosok Lim; Fernando D Testai; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Hsun Tien; Wen-Yu Liu; Yi-Lin Chen; Yi-Chen Wu; Hen-Yu Lien
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.