Literature DB >> 28800299

Representing the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration errors.

Jason Vickress1, Jerry Battista, Rob Barnett, Slav Yartsev.   

Abstract

Deformable image registration (DIR) is emerging as a tool in radiation therapy for calculating the cumulative dose distribution across multiple fractions of treatment. Unfortunately, due to the variable nature of DIR algorithms and dependence of performance on image quality, registration errors can result in dose accumulation errors. In this study, landmarked images were used to characterize the DIR error throughout an image space and determine its impact on dosimetric analysis. Ten thoracic 4DCT images with 300 landmarks per image study matching the end-inspiration and end-expiration phases were obtained from 'dir-labs'. DIR was performed using commercial software MIM Maestro. The range of dose uncertainty (RDU) was calculated at each landmark pair as the maximum and minimum of the doses within a sphere around the landmark in the end-expiration phase. The radius of the sphere was defined by a measure of DIR error which included either the actual DIR error, mean DIR error per study, constant errors of 2 or 5 mm, inverse consistency error, transitivity error or the distance discordance metric (DDM). The RDUs were evaluated using the magnitude of dose uncertainty (MDU) and inclusion rate (IR) of actual error lying within the predicted RDU. The RDU was calculated for 300 landmark pairs on each 4DCT study for all measures of DIR error. The most representative RDU was determined using the actual DIR error with a MDU of 2.5 Gy and IR of 97%. Across all other measures of DIR error, the DDM was most predictive with a MDU of 2.5 Gy and IR of 86%, closest to the actual DIR error. The proposed method represents the range of dosimetric uncertainty of DIR error using either landmarks at specific voxels or measures of registration accuracy throughout the volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800299     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Patient-specific calibration of cone-beam computed tomography data sets for radiotherapy dose calculations and treatment plan assessment.

Authors:  Michael MacFarlane; Daniel Wong; Douglas A Hoover; Eugene Wong; Carol Johnson; Jerry J Battista; Jeff Z Chen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Online daily assessment of dose change in head and neck radiotherapy without dose-recalculation.

Authors:  Jason R Vickress; Jerry Battista; Rob Barnett; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Re-irradiation volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization based on cumulative biologically effective dose objectives.

Authors:  Nevin McVicar; Steven Thomas; Mitchell Liu; Hannah Carolan; Alanah Bergman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.