Literature DB >> 2879979

Clinical guidelines, medical litigation, and the current medical defence system.

I M Harvey, C J Roberts.   

Abstract

The introduction into National Health Service medical practice of guidelines designed to achieve more effective use of clinical resources is likely to encounter opposition owing to the increasing fear of litigation amongst clinicians. Hospital doctors are unusual amongst salaried professionals in being required to bear the cost of indemnity insurance themselves. The advantages for doctors commonly attributed to this arrangement are insubstantial. A system of no-fault compensation is unlikely to be implemented in this country in the foreseeable future. If guidelines are to achieve wide acceptability amongst clinicians, health authorities must accept full legal and financial responsibility for the actions of doctors in their employment, as they currently do for other health service staff.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2879979     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91976-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: proliferation and medicolegal significance.

Authors:  B Hurwitz
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

2.  Guidelines for medical practice: 1. The reasons why.

Authors:  A L Linton; D K Peachey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Consultant accountability.

Authors:  J O Drife
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-03-28

4.  Medicolegal aspects of accident and emergency medicine.

Authors:  A D Redmond
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1987-06

Review 5.  Clinical practice guidelines: from methodological to practical issues.

Authors:  N Roche; P Durieux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.