Literature DB >> 28799659

Perspectives on Cybersecurity Information Sharing among Multiple Stakeholders Using a Decision-Theoretic Approach.

Meilin He1, Laura Devine1, Jun Zhuang1.   

Abstract

The government, private sectors, and others users of the Internet are increasingly faced with the risk of cyber incidents. Damage to computer systems and theft of sensitive data caused by cyber attacks have the potential to result in lasting harm to entities under attack, or to society as a whole. The effects of cyber attacks are not always obvious, and detecting them is not a simple proposition. As the U.S. federal government believes that information sharing on cybersecurity issues among organizations is essential to safety, security, and resilience, the importance of trusted information exchange has been emphasized to support public and private decision making by encouraging the creation of the Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC). Through a decision-theoretic approach, this article provides new perspectives on ISAC, and the advent of the new Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations (ISAOs), which are intended to provide similar benefits to organizations that cannot fit easily into the ISAC structure. To help understand the processes of information sharing against cyber threats, this article illustrates 15 representative information sharing structures between ISAC, government, and other participating entities, and provide discussions on the strategic interactions between different stakeholders. This article also identifies the costs of information sharing and information security borne by different parties in this public-private partnership both before and after cyber attacks, as well as the two main benefits. This article provides perspectives on the mechanism of information sharing and some detailed cost-benefit analysis.
© 2017 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Cybersecurity; Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC); Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations (ISAOs); information sharing

Year:  2017        PMID: 28799659     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

Review 1.  Sharing Knowledge to an Entrant for Production Investment Confronting COVID-19: Incentive Alignment and Lose-Lose Dilemma.

Authors:  Baozhuang Niu; Zhipeng Dai; Qiyang Li
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.302

2.  Improvement Path for Resource-Constrained Cities Identified Using an Environmental Co-Governance Assessment Framework Based on BWM-mV Model.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Jin-Chun Huang; Shan-Lin Huang; Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng; Ting Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.