Literature DB >> 28799475

Can Staff Be Supported to Deliver Compassionate Care Through Implementing Schwartz Rounds in Community and Mental Health Services?

Michelle Farr1,2,3, Rhiannon Barker4.   

Abstract

Schwartz Rounds are evidence-based interdisciplinary discussions where health care staff can share experiences of the emotional and social aspects of care, to support improvements in patient care. Developed in acute services, they are now being implemented in various settings including U.K. community and mental health services where their implementation has not been researched. Realist evaluation was used to analyze three community and mental health case studies of Round implementation, involving Round observations ( n = 5), staff interviews ( n = 22), and post-Round evaluation sheets ( n = 206). Where Schwartz Rounds were successfully implemented and facilitated, the discussions enabled emotional resonance across interdisciplinary colleagues about caring experiences, enabling the recognition of a common humanity. Participants appreciated attending Rounds and saw they improved communications, trust, and openness with colleagues and enabled more compassionate care with patients. The wide geographical dispersal of staff and work pressures were challenges in attending Rounds, and strong leadership is needed to support their implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  England; Schwartz Rounds; compassion; mental health; organizational culture; realist evaluation; staff support

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28799475     DOI: 10.1177/1049732317702101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  9 in total

1.  What Is the State of Compassion Education? A Systematic Review of Compassion Training in Health Care.

Authors:  Shane Sinclair; Jane Kondejewski; Priya Jaggi; Liz Dennett; Amanda L Roze des Ordons; Thomas F Hack
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.840

Review 2.  Enhancing psychological safety in mental health services.

Authors:  D F Hunt; J Bailey; B R Lennox; M Crofts; C Vincent
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-04-14

3.  Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation.

Authors:  Jeremy Dawson; Imelda McCarthy; Cath Taylor; Kristin Hildenbrand; Mary Leamy; Ellie Reynolds; Jill Maben
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Status of Compassionate, Respectful, and Caring Health Service Delivery: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Adane Nigusie; Binyam Tilahun; Berhanu F Endehabtu; Dessie Abebaw Angaw; Alemayehu Teklu; Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen; Marta Feletto; Abraham Assan; Assegid Samuel; Kabir Sheikh
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Schwartz Rounds for Staff in an Australian Tertiary Hospital: Protocol for a Pilot Uncontrolled Trial.

Authors:  Tatjana Ewais; Georgia Hunt; Jonathan Munro; Paul Pun; Christy Hogan; Leeroy William; Andrew Teodorczuk
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-04-27

6.  Kindness, Listening, and Connection: Patient and Clinician Key Requirements for Emotional Support in Chronic and Complex Care.

Authors:  Jane Bradshaw; Nazlee Siddiqui; David Greenfield; Anita Sharma
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-04-12

7.  Guilt, tears and burnout-Impact of UK care home restrictions on the mental well-being of staff, families and residents.

Authors:  Clarissa Giebel; Kerry Hanna; Paul Marlow; Jacqueline Cannon; Hilary Tetlow; Justine Shenton; Thomas Faulkner; Manoj Rajagopal; Stephen Mason; Mark Gabbay
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.057

8.  Nurses need support during Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Paul Veitch; Karen Richardson
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.720

9.  Can Schwartz Center Rounds support healthcare staff with emotional challenges at work, and how do they compare with other interventions aimed at providing similar support? A systematic review and scoping reviews.

Authors:  Cath Taylor; Andreas Xyrichis; Mary C Leamy; Ellie Reynolds; Jill Maben
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.