| Literature DB >> 28799472 |
Fauzia Knight1, Damien Ridge2, Rupert McShane1,3, Sara Ryan1, Laura Griffith4.
Abstract
Despite evidence of short-term effectiveness of ECT (electroconvulsive therapy), both positive and negative patient reports are common. However, research examining these polarized accounts has not adequately elucidated why such divergences occur. We thus sought to examine opposing patient narratives to better understand underlying meanings. Eighteen interviews were conducted with U.K.-based people who had experienced the treatment. Our analysis revealed that the quality of relations with staff, ECT artifacts (e.g., the ECT suite), and perceived outcomes all play a role in divergent accounts. Positive reflections on ECT emerged alongside narratives of trust in staff, comfort with ECT, and perception of sufficient personal control. Conversely, where negative evaluations of ECT predominated, there was anger associated with a lack of control, a belief that ECT made little sense, and was linked to past abuses and/or the unacceptability of side effects. We discuss the implications of our findings for professionals.Entities:
Keywords: Abuse; United Kingdom; empowermen; mental health and illness; mental health nursing; powe; psychiatry; qualitative interviews, constant comparison, actor-network theory; user experiences
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28799472 DOI: 10.1177/1049732317701403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Qual Health Res ISSN: 1049-7323