Literature DB >> 28798986

A Phase II Multicentre, Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept Study of Tasquinimod in Hepatocellular, Ovarian, Renal Cell, and Gastric Cancers.

Bernard Escudier1, Sandrine Faivre2, Eric Van Cutsem3, Nathalie Germann4, Jean-Christophe Pouget4, Ruth Plummer5, Ignace Vergote3, Fiona Thistlethwaite6, Georg A Bjarnason7, Robert Jones8, Helen Mackay7, Julien Edeline9, Laetitia Fartoux10, Hal Hirte11, Amit Oza8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tasquinimod is a small molecule with immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-metastatic properties that targets the tumor microenvironment. This study aimed to obtain a clinical proof of concept that tasquinimod was active and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This early stopping design, open-label, proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluated the clinical activity of tasquinimod in four independent cohorts of patients with advanced hepatocellular (n = 53), ovarian (n = 55), renal cell (n = 38), and gastric (n = 21) cancers. Tasquinimod was given orally every day (0.5 mg/day for at least 2 weeks, with dose increase to 1 mg/day) until radiological progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria, intolerable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST 1.1 by central assessment.
RESULTS: Interim futility analyses at 8 weeks (6 weeks for the gastric cancer cohort) found adequate clinical activity of tasquinimod only in the hepatocellular cohort and recruitment to the other three cohorts was stopped. PFS rates were 26.9% at 16 weeks, 7.3% at 24 weeks, 13.2% at 16 weeks, and 9.5% at 12 weeks, respectively, in hepatocellular, ovarian, renal cell, and gastric cancer cohorts. The pre-defined PFS threshold was not reached in the hepatocellular cancer cohort at the second stage of the trial. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (48.5%), nausea (34.1%), decreased appetite (31.7%), and vomiting (24.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate clinical activity of tasquinimod in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular, ovarian, renal cell, and gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01743469.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28798986     DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0525-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Target Oncol        ISSN: 1776-2596            Impact factor:   4.493


  11 in total

1.  Tasquinimod modulates suppressive myeloid cells and enhances cancer immunotherapies in murine models.

Authors:  Li Shen; Anette Sundstedt; Michael Ciesielski; Kiersten Marie Miles; Mona Celander; Remi Adelaiye; Ashley Orillion; Eric Ciamporcero; Swathi Ramakrishnan; Leigh Ellis; Robert Fenstermaker; Scott I Abrams; Helena Eriksson; Tomas Leanderson; Anders Olsson; Roberto Pili
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 11.151

2.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Saira Khalique; Jane M Hook; Jonathan A Ledermann
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Tasquinimod in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Cora Sternberg; Andrew Armstrong; Roberto Pili; Siobhan Ng; Robert Huddart; Neeraj Agarwal; Denis Khvorostenko; Olexiy Lyulko; Arija Brize; Nicholas Vogelzang; Rémy Delva; Mihai Harza; Anastasios Thanos; Nicholas James; Patrick Werbrouck; Martin Bögemann; Thomas Hutson; Piotr Milecki; Simon Chowdhury; Enrique Gallardo; Gilberto Schwartsmann; Jean-Christophe Pouget; Frédérique Baton; Thore Nederman; Helen Tuvesson; Michael Carducci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Craig Murdoch; Munitta Muthana; Seth B Coffelt; Claire E Lewis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Gabriele Bergers; Douglas Hanahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Early stopping designs based on progression-free survival at an early time point in the initial cohort.

Authors:  Samuel Litwin; Yu-Ning Wong; Gary Hudes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  S100A9 interaction with TLR4 promotes tumor growth.

Authors:  Eva Källberg; Thomas Vogl; David Liberg; Anders Olsson; Per Björk; Pernilla Wikström; Anders Bergh; Johannes Roth; Fredrik Ivars; Tomas Leanderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Mechanisms of action of tasquinimod on the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  E Raymond; A Dalgleish; J-E Damber; M Smith; R Pili
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Tasquinimod triggers an early change in the polarization of tumor associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Anders Olsson; Jessica Nakhlé; Anette Sundstedt; Pascale Plas; Anne-Laure Bauchet; Valérie Pierron; Luce Bruetschy; Adnan Deronic; Marie Törngren; David Liberg; Fabien Schmidlin; Tomas Leanderson
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells to enhance natural killer cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shweta Joshi; Andrew Sharabi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive cells in cancer: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Yan Tie; Fan Tang; Yu-Quan Wei; Xia-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 23.168

Review 3.  Resistance a major hindrance to chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: an insight.

Authors:  K Lohitesh; Rajdeep Chowdhury; Sudeshna Mukherjee
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 4.  Role of RAGE and Its Ligands on Inflammatory Responses to Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Griffith Kyle Otazu; Mojtaba Dayyani; Behnam Badie
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 5.  Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as immunosuppressive regulators and therapeutic targets in cancer.

Authors:  Kai Li; Houhui Shi; Benxia Zhang; Xuejin Ou; Qizhi Ma; Yue Chen; Pei Shu; Dan Li; Yongsheng Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-10-07

Review 6.  The S100 Protein Family as Players and Therapeutic Targets in Pulmonary Diseases.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sattar; Alnardo Lora; Bakr Jundi; Christopher Railwah; Patrick Geraghty
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2021-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.