The ability of short pulse laser ablation in liquids to produce clean colloidal nanoparticles and unusual surface morphology has been employed in a broad range of practical applications. In this paper, we report the results of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations aimed at revealing the key processes that control the surface morphology and nanoparticle size distributions by pulsed laser ablation in liquids. The simulations of bulk Ag targets irradiated in water are performed with an advanced computational model combining a coarse-grained representation of liquid environment and an atomistic description of laser interaction with metal targets. For the irradiation conditions that correspond to the spallation regime in vacuum, the simulations predict that the water environment can prevent the complete separation of the spalled layer from the target, leading to the formation of large subsurface voids stabilized by rapid cooling and solidification. The subsequent irradiation of the laser-modified surface is found to result in a more efficient ablation and nanoparticle generation, thus suggesting the possibility of the incubation effect in multipulse laser ablation in liquids. The simulations performed at higher laser fluences that correspond to the phase explosion regime in vacuum reveal the accumulation of the ablation plume at the interface with the water environment and the formation of a hot metal layer. The water in contact with the metal layer is brought to the supercritical state and provides an environment suitable for nucleation and growth of small metal nanoparticles from metal atoms emitted from the hot metal layer. The metal layer itself has limited stability and can readily disintegrate into large (tens of nanometers) nanoparticles. The layer disintegration is facilitated by the Rayleigh-Taylor instability of the interface between the higher density metal layer decelerated by the pressure from the lighter supercritical water. The nanoparticles emerging from the layer disintegration are rapidly cooled and solidified due to the interaction with water environment, with a cooling rate of ∼2 × 1012 K/s observed in the simulations. The computational prediction of two distinct mechanisms of nanoparticle formation yielding nanoparticles with different characteristic sizes provides a plausible explanation for the experimental observations of bimodal nanoparticle size distributions in laser ablation in liquids. The ultrahigh cooling and solidification rates suggest the possibility for generation of nanoparticles featuring metastable phases and highly nonequilibrium structures.
The ability of short pulse laser ablation in liquids to produce clean colloidal nanoparticles and unusual surface morphology has been employed in a broad range of practical applications. In this paper, we report the results of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations aimed at revealing the key processes that control the surface morphology and nanoparticle size distributions by pulsed laser ablation in liquids. The simulations of bulk Ag targets irradiated in water are performed with an advanced computational model combining a coarse-grained representation of liquid environment and an atomistic description of laser interaction with metal targets. For the irradiation conditions that correspond to the spallation regime in vacuum, the simulations predict that the water environment can prevent the complete separation of the spalled layer from the target, leading to the formation of large subsurface voids stabilized by rapid cooling and solidification. The subsequent irradiation of the laser-modified surface is found to result in a more efficient ablation and nanoparticle generation, thus suggesting the possibility of the incubation effect in multipulse laser ablation in liquids. The simulations performed at higher laser fluences that correspond to the phase explosion regime in vacuum reveal the accumulation of the ablation plume at the interface with the water environment and the formation of a hot metal layer. The water in contact with the metal layer is brought to the supercritical state and provides an environment suitable for nucleation and growth of small metal nanoparticles from metal atoms emitted from the hot metal layer. The metal layer itself has limited stability and can readily disintegrate into large (tens of nanometers) nanoparticles. The layer disintegration is facilitated by the Rayleigh-Taylor instability of the interface between the higher density metal layer decelerated by the pressure from the lighter supercritical water. The nanoparticles emerging from the layer disintegration are rapidly cooled and solidified due to the interaction with water environment, with a cooling rate of ∼2 × 1012 K/s observed in the simulations. The computational prediction of two distinct mechanisms of nanoparticle formation yielding nanoparticles with different characteristic sizes provides a plausible explanation for the experimental observations of bimodal nanoparticle size distributions in laser ablation in liquids. The ultrahigh cooling and solidification rates suggest the possibility for generation of nanoparticles featuring metastable phases and highly nonequilibrium structures.
Short
pulse laser processing and ablation of metal targets in liquids
are gaining increasing attention due to the demonstrated ability of
the liquid environment to strongly affect the morphology of the laser-treated
surfaces[1−11] and to enable production of clean colloidal solutions of nanoparticles.[12−17] Pulsed laser ablation in liquids (PLAL), in particular, has emerged
as a promising technique featuring a number of advantages with respect
to traditional chemical methods of nanoparticle generation.[18] The nanoparticles generated via PLAL are not
only environmentally friendly but also chemically clean and stable.[19,20] Moreover, the ever-increasing productivity of PLAL[21−23] has attracted laboratory and industrial applications in various
fields, including nanophotonics,[24] biomedicine,[25,26] and chemical catalysis.[27−29] The PLAL has also been proven
to be a versatile technique capable of synthesizing nanoparticles
from a board range of target material systems[30−36] and with a size control achieved through fine-tuning various experimental
parameters, including the choice of the liquid medium,[36−44] control over pressure and temperature conditions in the liquid,[45−47] addition of organic ligands[13,19,48,49] or inorganic salts,[50] variation of laser irradiation parameters,[12,16,17,43] and postirradiation processing.[51−54] Moreover, the highly nonequilibrium
nature of the interaction between the ablation plume and liquid environment
provides opportunities for synthesis of nanoparticles with unusual
structure, shape, and composition.[30,35,39,55−57]The presence of a liquid environment not only has a profound
effect
on the structure and size distribution of nanoparticles generated
in laser ablation but also contributes to the quenching of the transiently
melted surface structures, thus creating conditions for stronger undercooling
and formation of highly nonequilibrium surface morphology and microstructure.
While the rapid developments in the area of nanoparticle generation
in PLAL[18,58,59] have overshadowed
the use of the liquid environment in laser surface processing, there
have been a number of experimental studies demonstrating the possibility
of controlling the surface morphology through the choice of liquid
and irradiation conditions.[1−11] The lack of a clear physical understanding of the mechanisms involved
in liquid-assisted surface nanostructuring, however, has been hampering
the transition from the initial demonstration of promising results
for specific material systems to the emergence of a robust general
technique of surface processing.In order to fully utilize the
potential of pulsed laser irradiation
in liquids for both surface nanostructuring and generation of nanoparticles
with well-controlled structure, composition, and size distribution,
one needs to improve the understanding of the laser-induced processes
responsible for the generation of frozen surface features and colloidal
nanoparticles. Such an understanding can only emerge from simultaneous
progress in time-resolved experimental probing, theoretical description,
and computational modeling of laser-induced processes.Experimentally,
the information on the expansion of a bubble generated
due to the interaction of the ablation plume with liquid environment[60−62] has recently been complemented by the results of small-angle X-ray
scattering (SAXS) probing of the evolution of the nanoparticle size
distribution with respect to time and position inside the bubble.[63−66] The experimental evidence suggests that the cavitation bubble serves
as a reaction chamber for the nanoparticle nucleation, growth, coalescence,
and solidification, while two or more distinct nanoparticle populations
may appear at different stages of the bubble expansion and collapse.
The initial and most critical stage of the nanoparticle formation
at the early stage of the bubble generation and expansion, however,
remains beyond the temporal and spatial resolution of the experimental
techniques. Moreover, the evaluation of thermodynamic states of the
ablation plume confined in the cavitation bubble based on the dynamics
of the bubble expansion[60−62] can only be done with a large
degree of uncertainty.The theoretical and computational treatments
of laser–material
interactions in liquids have also been hampered by the highly nonequilibrium
nature of the laser-induced processes. The interaction of the ablation
plume with liquid environment adds an additional layer of complexity
to the laser ablation, which by itself is a rather complex phenomenon.
The continuum-level modeling, in particular, while successful in providing
initial insights into the effect of the spatial confinement on the
ablation plume expansion and phase decomposition,[67,68] has been suffering from the lack of an adequate description of some
of the key processes, such as vaporization of the liquid, mixing of
the ablation plume with liquid environment, and generation of nanoparticles
in the mixing region. The atomic-level molecular dynamics (MD) computational
technique is suitable for exploring nonequilibrium phenomena and can
provide atomic-level insights into the laser-induced processes, as
reviewed in refs (69−71). The added cost of the
atomistic representation of the liquid environment, combined with
the relatively large time and length scales of processes responsible
for the nanoparticle generation in PLAL and/or resolidification of
the irradiated surfaces, however, have been preventing applications
of MD simulations to the analysis of laser-induced surface nanostructuring
and nanoparticle generation in liquids.New opportunities for
expanding the domain of applicability of
MD simulations have been provided by recent developments of a computationally
efficient coarse-grained representation of liquid environment[72−74] and advanced boundary conditions,[75] which
have led to the design of a hybrid atomistic–coarse-grained
MD model capable of revealing the specific characteristics of laser–material
interactions in liquids.[74,76] In particular, simulations
of laser ablation of thin metal films in water environment have predicted
the existence of two distinct mechanisms of the nanoparticle formation
in PLAL during the first nanoseconds of the ablation process, the
nucleation and growth of small nanoparticles in the metal–water
mixing region, and generation of larger (tens of nanometers) nanoparticles
through the breakup of a hot molten metal layer formed at the front
of the expanding ablation plume confined by the water environment.[74] The latter mechanism is activated by the development
of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability at the interface between
the metal layer and water brought to the supercritical state by the
interaction with the hot ablation plume. First simulations of laser
melting and resolidification of bulk metal targets in liquids have
also been performed and suggested that the presence of a liquid environment
suppresses nucleation of subsurface voids, provides an additional
pathway for cooling through the heat conduction to the liquid, and
facilitates the formation of nanocrystalline surface structure.[76] In the simulations reported in this paper, we
extend the investigation of laser interactions with bulk metal targets
to higher laser fluences, where spallation or phase explosion of a
surface region of the irradiated target in vacuum takes place. The
implications of the interaction of the ablation plume with liquid
environment on the formation of nanoparticles and morphology of resolidified
surface are analyzed based on the simulation results.The paper
is organized as follows. A brief description of the computational
model and parameters of the computational setup is provided in Section . The results of
large-scale simulations of laser spallation and phase explosion confined
by the liquid environment are reported in Sections and 3.2. The implications
of Rayleigh–Taylor instability at the plume–water interface
for the nanoparticle generation are discussed in Section . The results of the second
pulse laser irradiation of a target already modified by the first
pulse as well as the general microscopic mechanisms of nanoparticle
generation in the regime of confined phase explosion are presented
in Section . A
summary of the computational predictions is provided in Section .
Computational
Model for MD Simulation of Laser
Interactions with Metals in Liquids
The simulations reported
in this paper are performed with a hybrid
computational model combining a coarse-grained representation of liquid,
a fully atomistic description of laser interaction with metal targets,
and acoustic impedance matching boundary conditions designed to mimic
the nonreflecting propagation of the laser-induced pressure waves
through the boundaries of the computational domain. A schematic representation
of the computational system is shown in Figure . The computational setup is designed and
parametrized for a bulk Ag target covered by water and irradiated
by femtosecond and picosecond laser pulses. A brief description of
the main components of the computational model as well as details
of the computational setup are provided below.
Figure 1
Schematic representation
of the combined continuum—coarse-grained—atomistic
model for simulation of laser interactions with metals in the liquid
environment. The top part of the metal target is represented by the
TTM-MD model described in Section ; the temperature evolution in the deeper part of the
target is described by TTM equations; and part of the liquid environment
adjacent to the metal surface is simulated with a coarse-grained MD
model described in Section . At the bottom of the TTM-MD and on the top of the coarse-grained
MD regions, the pressure wave transmitting boundary conditions are
imposed. Both the Ag target and the liquid overlayer are assumed to
be sufficiently thick to ensure that any effects caused by the reflection
of the laser-induced pressure waves from the outer surfaces of the
target and overlayer can be neglected. The computational system represents
a small region within the laser spot, and periodic boundary conditions
are applied in the lateral directions, parallel to the surface of
the target. The spatial discretization in the continuum part of the
model and the dimensions of the atomistic and continuum regions are
not drawn to scale.
Schematic representation
of the combined continuum—coarse-grained—atomistic
model for simulation of laser interactions with metals in the liquid
environment. The top part of the metal target is represented by the
TTM-MD model described in Section ; the temperature evolution in the deeper part of the
target is described by TTM equations; and part of the liquid environment
adjacent to the metal surface is simulated with a coarse-grained MD
model described in Section . At the bottom of the TTM-MD and on the top of the coarse-grained
MD regions, the pressure wave transmitting boundary conditions are
imposed. Both the Ag target and the liquid overlayer are assumed to
be sufficiently thick to ensure that any effects caused by the reflection
of the laser-induced pressure waves from the outer surfaces of the
target and overlayer can be neglected. The computational system represents
a small region within the laser spot, and periodic boundary conditions
are applied in the lateral directions, parallel to the surface of
the target. The spatial discretization in the continuum part of the
model and the dimensions of the atomistic and continuum regions are
not drawn to scale.
TTM-MD
Model for Laser Interactions with Metals
The laser interaction
with bulk metal target is simulated with
a hybrid atomistic-continuum model[77−81] that combines the classical molecular dynamics (MD)
method with the two-temperature model (TTM)[82] commonly used in the simulations of short pulse laser interactions
with metals, e.g., refs (83−85). The idea of
the combined TTM-MD model is schematically illustrated in Figure and is briefly explained
below.In the original TTM, the time evolution of the lattice
and electron temperatures, Tl and Te, is described by two coupled differential
equations (eqs 1 and 2 in Figure ) that account for the electron heat conduction in
the metal target and the energy exchange between the electrons and
atomic vibrations. In the combined TTM-MD method (eqs 1 and 3 in Figure ), MD substitutes
the TTM equation for the lattice temperature in the surface region
of the target, where laser-induced structural and phase transformations
take place. The diffusion equation for the electron temperature, Te, is solved by a finite difference method simultaneously
with MD integration of the equations of motion of atoms. The cells
in the finite difference discretization are related to the corresponding
volumes of the MD system, and the local lattice temperature, Tlcell, is defined for each cell from the average kinetic energy of thermal
motion of atoms (Ncell is the instantaneous
number of atoms in a given cell). Note that, following the terminology
established in the literature presenting TTM calculations, the term
“lattice temperature” does not imply the preservation
of the crystalline order in the irradiated material but is simply
used here to refer to the temperature of the ionic subsystem that
is brought out of equilibrium with the conduction-band electrons.The electron temperature enters a coupling term, ξmv⃗th, that is added to the MD equations of motion to account for the
energy exchange between the electrons and atomic vibrations. In this
coupling term, ξ is a coefficient that depends on the instantaneous
difference between the local lattice and electron temperatures as
well as the strength of the electron–phonon coupling;[77]m is the mass of an atom i; v⃗th is the thermal velocity of the atom defined as v⃗th = v⃗ – v⃗c, where v⃗ is the actual velocity of atom i; and v⃗c is the velocity
of the center of mass of a cell to which the atom i belongs. The expansion, density variation, and, at higher fluences,
disintegration of the irradiated target predicted in the MD part of
the model are accounted for through the corresponding changes of the
parameters of the TTM equation for electron temperature. The atoms
crossing from one cell to another carry the corresponding electron
thermal energy along, thus ensuring the total energy conservation.[86] The three-dimensional solution of the diffusion
equation for Te is used in large-scale
simulations of laser spallation and ablation,[79−81] where the dynamic
material decomposition may result in lateral density and temperature
variations, as well as in simulations of spatially localized laser
energy deposition.[87−89]As schematically illustrated in Figure , the atomic-level TTM-MD representation
is used only for the top part of the metal target, where the laser-induced
structural modifications take place. In the deeper part of the target,
beyond the TTM-MD region, the electron heat conduction and the energy
exchange between the electrons and the lattice are described by the
conventional TTM equations, with LTTM chosen
to ensure negligible temperature changes at the bottom of the computational
domain during the simulation time. A dynamic pressure-transmitting
boundary condition[75,90,91] is applied at the bottom of the MD part of the system (marked as
④ in Figure ) to ensure nonreflecting propagation of the laser-induced stress
wave from the MD region of the computational system to the bulk of
the target. The energy carried away by the stress wave is calculated,
so that the total energy conservation in the combined model could
be monitored in the course of the simulation.[92]
Interatomic Potential and TTM Parameters for
Ag
The interatomic interactions in the MD part of the model
are described by the embedded atom method (EAM) potential with the
functional form and parametrization developed in ref (93). A cutoff function suggested
in ref (94) is added
to the potential to smoothly bring the interaction energies and forces
to zero at interatomic distance of 5.5 Å. Although the potential
is fitted to low-temperature values of the equilibrium lattice constant,
sublimation energy, elastic constants, and vacancy formation energy,
it also provides a good description of high-temperature thermodynamic
properties of Ag[95] relevant to the simulation
of laser-induced processes. In particular, the equilibrium melting
temperature, Tm, determined in liquid–crystal
coexistence simulations, is 1139 ± 2 K,[96] about 8% below the experimental values of 1235 K.[97] The threshold temperature for the onset of the explosive
phase separation into liquid and vapor, T*, determined
in simulations of slow heating of a metastable liquid, is found to
be ∼3450 K at zero pressure and ∼4850 K at 0.5 GPa.[75] The onset of the phase explosion can be expected
at about 10% below the critical temperature,[98−100] and the values
of T* calculated for the EAM Ag material are not
in conflict with the range of experimental values of the critical
temperature of Ag spanning from 4300 to 7500 K.[101]The electron temperature dependences of the thermophysical
material properties included in the TTM equation for the electron
temperature (electron–phonon coupling factor and electron heat
capacity) are taken in the forms that account for the thermal excitation
from the electron states below the Fermi level.[102] The electron thermal conductivity is described by the Drude
model relationship, Ke(Te,Tl) = v2Ce(Te)τe(Te,Tl)/3, where Ce(Te) is the electron heat capacity; v2 is the mean square velocity of the electrons contributing
to the electron heat conductivity, approximated in this work as the
Fermi velocity squared, vF2; and τe(Te,Tl) is the total electron scattering time defined
by the electron–electron and electron–phonon scattering
rates, 1/τe = 1/τe–e + 1/τe–ph = ATe2 + BTl. The
value of the coefficient A, 3.57 × 106 s–1 K–2, is estimated within
the free electron model,[96] following the
approach suggested in ref (103). The value of the coefficient B, 1.12
× 1011 s–1 K–1, is fitted to the experimental thermal conductivity of solid Ag
at the melting temperature, 363 W m–1 K–1.[104]
Coarse-Grained
MD Representation of Liquid
Environment
The direct application of the conventional all-atom
MD representation of liquids in large-scale simulations of laser processing
or ablation is not feasible due to the high computational cost. Thus,
a coarse-grained representation of the liquid environment, where each
particle represents several molecules, is adapted in this work. The
coarse-grained MD model combines the breathing sphere model developed
for simulations of laser interaction with molecular systems[105,106] with a heat bath approach that associates an internal energy variable
with each coarse-grained particle.[72−74,107,108] The heat bath approach makes
it possible to account for the degrees of freedom that are missing
in the coarse-grained model and to reproduce the experimental heat
capacity of the liquid.[72] The energy exchange
between the internal heat bath energy of the particles and their dynamic
degrees of freedom is controlled by the dynamic coupling between the
translational degrees of freedom and the vibrational (breathing) mode
associated with each coarse-grained particle (the particles are allowed
to change their radii or to “breath”). The breathing
mode is, in turn, directly connected to the internal heat bath through
a damping force applied to the breathing motion and proportional to
the difference between the local temperature associated with the breathing
motion and the temperature of the heat bath.[72−74] The coupling
between the heat bath and the breathing mode is done at the level
of individual coarse-grained particles, and the capacity of the heat
bath is chosen to reproduce the real heat capacity of the group of
atoms represented by each coarse-grained particle. Effectively, the
breathing mode serves as a “gate” for accessing the
energy stored in the heat bath and controlling the energy exchange
between the heat bath and the energy of translational motion of the
particles.In the parametrization of the coarse-grained model
for water, each particle has a mass of 50 Da and represents about
three real water molecules. The potential describing the interparticle
interactions is provided in ref (72), and the parameters of the potential are selected
to ensure a satisfactory semiquantitative description of experimental
properties of water. In particular, the density and heat capacity
are directly fitted to the experimental values, while the speed of
sound, bulk modulus, viscosity, surface energy, melting temperature,
critical temperature, and critical density do not deviate from the
experimental values by more than 25%.[74]As shown in Figure , the coarse-grained MD representation of the water environment
is
used only in a layer with thickness of LCG-MD adjacent to the surface of the metal target. The thickness of this
layer is chosen to include the region affected by the phase transformations
induced in water by the interaction with hot metal surface and ablation
plume. At the top of the coarse-grained MD region, a dynamic acoustic
impedance matching boundary condition based on an imaginary plane
approach[75] is applied to ensure nonreflective
propagation of the pressure wave generated at the metal–water
interface into the bulk of a thick water overlayer. This boundary
condition is suitable for reproducing experimental conditions where
the reflection of the pressure wave from the outer surface of the
water overlayer does not have any significant effect on processes
occurring in the vicinity of the irradiated metal surface.The
interactions between Ag atoms and the coarse-grained water
particles are described by the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential fitted
to match the diffusion of metal atoms and small clusters in water
predicted by the Stoke–Einstein equation at 300 K.[74] Furthermore, the parameters of the LJ potential
are chosen to ensure that the values of the equilibrium O–Ag
distance and the adsorption energy of water on a Ag surface predicted
in ab initio simulations[109−112] are roughly reproduced by the coarse-grained model. Note that, while
it is possible to incorporate the description of chemical reactions
into the framework of the coarse-grained MD model,[106,113,114] we have not included descriptions
of oxidation or other chemical reactions in the version of the model
used in the present study.
Computational Setup and
Simulation Parameters
The simulations are performed for a
Ag bulk target covered by water,
as shown in Figure . The initial target has fcc crystal structure and (001) orientation
of the free surface. The periodic boundary conditions are applied
in the lateral directions, parallel to the surface of the target.
The dimensions of the computational system in the lateral directions
are 98.7 nm × 98.7 nm. The depth of the surface part of the Ag
target represented with atomistic resolution, LTTM-MD in Figure , and the corresponding number of Ag atoms are different in
simulations performed at different absorbed laser fluences, namely, LTTM-MD = 200 nm (112 million Ag atoms)
at Fabs = 150 mJ/cm2 in Section , LTTM-MD = 400 nm (224 million Ag atoms) at Fabs = 400 mJ/cm2 in Section , and LTTM-MD = 280 nm (126 million Ag atoms) at Fabs = 300 mJ/cm2 in Section . The thickness of the part
of the water overlayer represented by the coarse-grained MD model
discussed in Section is the same in the three simulations, LCG-MD = 300 nm, which corresponds to 34 million coarse-grained
particles. The size of the TTM part of the system, LTTM in Figure , is 3 μm, 2.8 μm, and 2.9 μm in the simulations
discussed in Sections , 3.2, and 3.4, respectively. The thicknesses of the parts of the system represented
with atomic and molecular resolutions, LTTM-MD and LCG-MD, are chosen based
on the results of back-of-the-envelope estimations of zones affected
by the laser-induced phase transformations, followed by small-scale
test simulations performed for systems with lateral dimensions of
5 nm × 5 nm. In order to highlight the effect of the liquid environment
on the laser-induced processes, the simulations described in Sections and 3.2 are also performed in vacuum, i.e., without the
liquid overlayer but with otherwise identical computational setups
and irradiation conditions.The laser irradiation of the target
is represented in the model through a source term added to the TTM
equation for the electron temperature.[77] The source term describes excitation of the conduction band electrons
by a laser pulse with a Gaussian temporal profile and reproduces the
exponential attenuation of laser intensity with the depth under the
surface. The optical absorption depth, 12 nm at laser wavelength of
800 nm,[115] combined with the effective
depth of the “ballistic” energy transport, estimated
to be about 56 nm for Ag,[75,80] is used in the source
term of the TTM equation.[77,83] The laser pulse durations,
τL, defined as full width at half-maximum of the
Gaussian profile, is 100 fs in all simulations. The reflectivity of
the surface is not defined in the model since the absorbed laser fluence, Fabs, rather than the incident fluence is used
in the presentation of the simulation results.All systems are
equilibrated at 300 K for 300 ps before applying
laser irradiation. The simulations are performed with a computationally
efficient parallel code implementing the combined TTM-MD—coarse-grained
MD model, with a three-dimensional treatment of the electronic heat
conduction in the TTM-MD part of the computational system.The
implementation of the model used in this work does not account
for ionization of the ejected plume, as simple estimations based on
the Saha–Eggert equation[116,117] suggest that
the degree of ionization in the ablation plume is negligible under
irradiation conditions applied in the simulations reported in this
paper. As a result, the nanoparticle formation through nucleation
around ion seeds in “misty plasma” considered for high
fluence nanosecond PLAL[61,118] is not relevant to
the milder irradiation conditions and short pulses considered in the
present work.
Results and Discussion
The results of large-scale simulations of laser interactions with
a Ag target in the spallation and phase explosion irradiation regimes
are presented first, in Sections and 3.2. The nature of the
Rayleigh–Taylor instability developing at the interface between
the ablation plume and the water environment and responsible for the
generation of large nanoparticles is discussed in Section . This discussion is followed
in Section by
the results of a simulation mimicking the effect of the second pulse
irradiation of a target modified by prior irradiation and providing
insights into the incubation effect and the mechanisms of the nanoparticle
generation at the initial stage of the ablation process.
Generation of Subsurface Voids through Partial
Spallation in Liquid
The simulations discussed in this section
are performed for irradiation conditions that correspond to the regime
of photomechanical spallation, when the dynamic relaxation of laser-induced
stresses results in subsurface cavitation and ejection of molten layers
or large droplets from the irradiated target.[79,119−121] In particular, for the pulse duration of
τL = 100 fs, the absorbed fluence applied in the
simulations, Fabs = 150 mJ/cm2, is about 50% above the spallation threshold in vacuum.[75,80,81] The visual picture of the spallation
process in vacuum is shown in Figure . A large number of small subsurface voids can be seen
to appear in the molten part of the target by the time of 100 ps.
The voids are generated in a region where the strength of the unloading
tensile wave produced due to the interaction of the laser-induced
compressive stresses with the free surface of the irradiated target
exceeds the limit of the dynamic stability of the metastable liquid
against the onset of the cavitation.[79] The
growth, coalescence, and percolation of the voids result in the formation
of a complex foamy structure of interconnected liquid regions connecting
the bulk of the target with an ∼28 nm thick top liquid layer
moving away from the target with an almost constant velocity of ∼530
m/s (Figures and 4a). The foamy structure coarsens with time and eventually
decomposes into individual droplets on the time scale of nanoseconds.
The top liquid layer is also expected to lose stability and decompose
into large droplets, estimated to have diameters from hundreds of
nanometers to tens of micrometers.[79]
Figure 2
Snapshots of
atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
laser spallation of a bulk Ag target irradiated in vacuum by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 150 mJ/cm2. Only a part of the computational system from −150
to 443 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target is shown
in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according to their potential
energies, with the scale chosen so that the crystalline part of the
target is blue, liquid Ag is green, and the top surface, internal
surfaces of the voids, and vapor-phase Ag atoms are red.
Figure 4
Density contour plots predicted in simulations of laser
spallation
of a bulk Ag target irradiated by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed
fluence of 150 mJ/cm2 in vacuum (a) and in water (b). The
blue line shows the location of the melting and solidification fronts.
In (b), the two black lines outline the water–Ag mixing region
defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag atoms are present.
Snapshots from the simulations are shown in Figures and 3.
Snapshots of
atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
laser spallation of a bulk Ag target irradiated in vacuum by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 150 mJ/cm2. Only a part of the computational system from −150
to 443 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target is shown
in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according to their potential
energies, with the scale chosen so that the crystalline part of the
target is blue, liquid Ag is green, and the top surface, internal
surfaces of the voids, and vapor-phase Ag atoms are red.The presence of a water environment has a profound
effect on the
dynamics of the spallation process, as can be seen from snapshots
and the density contour plot shown in Figures and 4b. While the multiple voids are still generated
in a subsurface region of the target, partial propagation of the laser-induced
pressure wave into the water overlayer reduces the strength of the
unloading tensile wave and increases the thickness of the molten layer
that is not affected by the void nucleation. Moreover, the resistance
of the water environment to the outward motion of the surface layer
decelerates the layer and, at about 1.35 ns after the laser pulse,
reverses the direction of its motion back toward the target. The deceleration
of the top layer under the water confinement makes it possible for
the material that forms the expanding foamy structure in vacuum (Figure ) to join the top
layer, resulting in a substantial thickening of the layer (Figures and 4b). This general picture of the spallation confined by a liquid
environment is consistent with the results of earlier one-dimensional
hydrodynamic simulations,[67] where the deceleration
of the top spalled layer followed by merging of several spalled layers
is predicted for femtosecond laser irradiation of a Au target in water.
Figure 3
Snapshots
of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
an incomplete laser spallation of a bulk silver target irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence
of 150 mJ/cm2. Only a part of the computational system
from −150 to 170 nm with respect to the initial surface of
the Ag target is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according
to their potential energies: from blue for the crystalline part of
the target, to green for liquid Ag, and to red for internal surfaces
of the voids and water–Ag interface. The molecules representing
the water environment are blanked, and the presence of water is illustrated
schematically by a light blue region above the Ag target.
Snapshots
of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
an incomplete laser spallation of a bulk silver target irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence
of 150 mJ/cm2. Only a part of the computational system
from −150 to 170 nm with respect to the initial surface of
the Ag target is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according
to their potential energies: from blue for the crystalline part of
the target, to green for liquid Ag, and to red for internal surfaces
of the voids and water–Ag interface. The molecules representing
the water environment are blanked, and the presence of water is illustrated
schematically by a light blue region above the Ag target.Density contour plots predicted in simulations of laser
spallation
of a bulk Ag target irradiated by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed
fluence of 150 mJ/cm2 in vacuum (a) and in water (b). The
blue line shows the location of the melting and solidification fronts.
In (b), the two black lines outline the water–Ag mixing region
defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag atoms are present.
Snapshots from the simulations are shown in Figures and 3.The resistance of the water environment to the
outward motion of
the top molten layer not only slows down the layer but also prevents
its complete separation from the target. The conductive cooling through
the remaining liquid bridge connecting the top layer to the bulk of
the target, combined with an additional cooling due to the interaction
with the water environment, brings the average temperature of the
liquid layer down to the melting point of the EAM Ag, Tm = 1139 K,[96] by the time of
740 ps and undercools the layer down to ∼0.85 Tm by the end of the simulation at 1690 ps. The cooling
of the molten layer is illustrated by Figure , where the average temperature of the top
10 nm thick part of the layer is plotted. To save computational time,
the simulation was not continued beyond 1690 ps. Nevertheless, one
can estimate, based on the cooling rate, the solidification front
advancement, and the downward velocity of the top liquid layer, that
the layer would solidify well before it could redeposit to the substrate.
The solidification is expected to mostly proceed by the epitaxial
regrowth of the single-crystal target through the bridge into the
top layer, with a possible additional contribution from the homogeneous
nucleation of new crystallites in the strongly undercooled liquid
layer. At the end of the simulation, the front of the epitaxial solidification
is already passing through the bridge, as can be seen from the last
snapshot shown for 1690 ps in Figure as well as from the contour plot in Figure b, where the advancement of
the solidification front is shown by the blue line. As has been demonstrated
in earlier studies,[80,81] a massive homogeneous nucleation
of new crystallites can be expected when the temperature the EAM Ag
material drops down to ∼0.69 Tm. Using an extrapolation of the cooling curve in Figure , one can estimate that this
level of undercooling should be reached by ∼4 ns, which sets
the upper limit for the time needed for the complete resolidification
of the target.
Figure 5
Evolution of the average temperature of a 10 nm thick
top surface
layer of a Ag target irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at
an absorbed fluence of 150 mJ/cm2. The part of the curve
colored blue is the data obtained in the simulation, while the part
colored in red is the extrapolation beyond the time of the simulation.
The snapshots and density contour plot from the simulation are shown
in Figures and 4b, respectively.
Evolution of the average temperature of a 10 nm thick
top surface
layer of a Ag target irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at
an absorbed fluence of 150 mJ/cm2. The part of the curve
colored blue is the data obtained in the simulation, while the part
colored in red is the extrapolation beyond the time of the simulation.
The snapshots and density contour plot from the simulation are shown
in Figures and 4b, respectively.The computational prediction of the formation of large subsurface
voids stabilized by the rapid cooling and solidification of the surface
region has two important implications. First, the subsurface voids
generated by the laser spallation confined by water are many times
larger than the ones observed in simulations performed close to the
spallation threshold in vacuum,[80] thus
suggesting a strong effect of liquid environment on modification of
surface morphology and microstructure. Second, the formation of a
complex foamy structure of frozen walls and bridges connecting a thin
surface layer to the bulk of the target can be expected to have a
strong impact on the generation of nanoparticles in the multipulse
irradiation regime. The latter implication is considered in more detail
in Section , where
the results of a simulation of the second pulse irradiation of a target
modified by the first pulse are discussed. The implication of the
surface morphology is discussed below, in the remainder of this section.While the subsurface cavitation and surface swelling produced by
trapping of laser-generated voids by the solidification front has
been observed in both simulations and experiments performed in vacuum,[80,122−125] the laser fluences resulting in the formation of subsurface voids
cover a rather narrow range in the vicinity of the spallation threshold.
For example, a recent atomistic simulation study of surface swelling
of a Ag target irradiated in vacuum[80] shows
the formation of subsurface voids and corresponding swelling of the
surface by ∼17 nm at an absorbed laser fluence of 85 mJ/cm2. An increase of the fluence to 90 mJ/cm2 leads
to the separation/spallation of the layer and generation of frozen
surface nanospikes rather than subsurface voids.[81] In contrast, the irradiation of a Ag target in the water
environment at an almost twice higher laser fluence, 150 mJ/cm2, does not lead to the complete separation of the top layer.
The solidification of the surface region in this case can be expected
to produce much larger subsurface voids and the corresponding swelling
of the irradiated area (Figure b).Similar to the subsurface voids observed in simulations
performed
in vacuum, the voids and the large surface expansion produced in the
simulation illustrated by Figures and 4b are driven by the relaxation
of laser-induced stresses and can be described as incomplete spallation.
This is apparent from Figure a,b, where the evolution of the number and total volume of
voids is plotted along with the pressure averaged over the subsurface
region where the voids are generated. The sharp increase of the number
of subsurface voids coincides with the time when the dynamic relaxation
of the compressive stresses produced by the laser energy deposition
puts the subsurface region into tension (Figure a). The number of voids generated in the
expanding liquid region quickly drops as the voids coalesce and coarsen,
while the total volume of voids continues to increase during the first
nanosecond after the laser pulse. The maximum expansion in this simulation
is more than two times larger than the one observed in the regime
of subsurface void generation in vacuum,[80] and the analysis of the kinetics of the solidification process provided
above indicates that much larger subsurface voids can be generated
in the presence of liquid environment. Note that under experimental
conditions the extent of the surface swelling can be substantially
larger than in the simulations performed for a small region within
the laser spot. The continuity of the top liquid layer extending beyond
the lateral size of the computational cell used in the simulations
can further stabilize the liquid layer and extend the range of fluences
that correspond to the surface swelling regime.[79,80,125]
Figure 6
Evolution of pressure (blue curves in a and
c), the total number
of voids (red curves), and the total volume of all voids (green curves
in b and d) predicted in simulations of Ag targets irradiated in water
by 100 fs laser pulses at absorbed fluences of 150 mJ/cm2 (a,b) and 400 mJ/cm2 (c,d). The pressure is averaged
over a region between 10 and 60 nm under the initial surface of the
Ag target, i.e., the region where the voids are generated. The generation
of voids is caused by the tensile stresses (negative pressure in a)
generated in the subsurface region of the target in the lower fluence
simulation (a,b) and by the internal release of vapor in the superheated
molten region of the target (phase explosion) in the higher fluence
simulation (c,d). The snapshots from the lower and higher fluence
simulations are shown in Figures and 8, respectively; the corresponding
density contour plots are shown in Figures b and 9b. The arrows
show the connection between the curves and the corresponding y-axes.
Evolution of pressure (blue curves in a and
c), the total number
of voids (red curves), and the total volume of all voids (green curves
in b and d) predicted in simulations of Ag targets irradiated in water
by 100 fs laser pulses at absorbed fluences of 150 mJ/cm2 (a,b) and 400 mJ/cm2 (c,d). The pressure is averaged
over a region between 10 and 60 nm under the initial surface of the
Ag target, i.e., the region where the voids are generated. The generation
of voids is caused by the tensile stresses (negative pressure in a)
generated in the subsurface region of the target in the lower fluence
simulation (a,b) and by the internal release of vapor in the superheated
molten region of the target (phase explosion) in the higher fluence
simulation (c,d). The snapshots from the lower and higher fluence
simulations are shown in Figures and 8, respectively; the corresponding
density contour plots are shown in Figures b and 9b. The arrows
show the connection between the curves and the corresponding y-axes.
Figure 8
Snapshots of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target irradiated in water by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2. The irradiation
conditions correspond to the regime of phase explosion confined by
the water environment. Only a part of the computational system from
−200 to 440 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target
is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according to their
potential energies, from blue for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase
Ag atoms. The molecules representing water environment are blanked,
and the presence of water is illustrated schematically by a light
blue region above the Ag target.
Figure 9
Density (a,b), temperature (c), and pressure (d) contour plots
predicted in simulations of a bulk Ag target irradiated by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2in vacuum (a) and in water (b–d).
The blue line shows the location of the melting and solidification
fronts. In (b–d), the two black lines outline the water–Ag
mixing region defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag
atoms are present. The blue (b,c) and red (d) dot background represents
the presence of water beyond the pressure-transmitting boundary applied
at the top of the water layer explicitly simulated with coarse-grained
MD. Corresponding snapshots from the simulations are shown in Figure for (a) and Figure for (b–d).
In general, the computational
prediction of the strong effect of
the liquid environment on the generation of frozen surface structures
is consistent with experimental observations of distinct surface morphologies
generated in laser processing in liquids.[1−11] The detailed analysis of the subsurface structures, however, has
not been reported for surfaces processed in liquids so far, and the
prediction of the enhanced generation of larger subsurface voids and
surface foaming still awaits experimental confirmation.
Generation of a Hot Metal Layer in Phase Explosion
under Liquid Confinement
The second set of the simulations,
illustrated in Figures –10, is performed at a higher absorbed laser fluence of 400 mJ/cm2, which is about twice the threshold fluence for the transition
from the spallation to phase explosion regimes of laser ablation in
vacuum.[75] The visual picture of the phase
explosion in vacuum is shown in Figure . In contrast to the spallation regime, where the top
part of the irradiated target remains in the liquid phase and is ejected
as a thin liquid layer (Figure ), the material ejection is driven in this case by the rapid
release of vapor in the strongly superheated surface region. The very
top layer of the target turns into a mixture of vapor and small atomic
clusters freely expanding away from the target, while the internal
release of vapor in the lower part of the target leads to the development
of a fine cellular structure that rapidly decomposes into a mixture
of small liquid droplets and vapor upon the expansion of the ablation
plume. In the even deeper part of the plume, below the cellular structure,
the propagation of tensile stresses leads to cavitation in the superheated
liquid and formation of large voids, which are almost free of vapor.
The expansion of this region leads to the growth and coalescence of
the voids and the formation of a foamy structure of interconnected
liquid regions extending in the direction of the plume expansion.
The clusters and droplets generated in the phase explosion of the
top part of the target and the ones emerging from photomechanical
cavitation and disintegration of the deeper region have different
velocities and contribute to different parts of the ablation plume,
thus leading to the segregation of the clusters of different sizes
in the expanding plume.[79,126]
Figure 7
Snapshots of atomic configurations
predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target irradiated in vacuum by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2. The irradiation
conditions correspond to the regime of phase explosion. Only a part
of the computational system from −220 to 500 nm with respect
to the initial surface of the target is shown in the snapshots. The
atoms are colored according to their potential energies, from blue
for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase Ag atoms.
Figure 10
Topographic images of the interface between
the hot metal layer
and water shown for the simulation illustrated by snapshots in Figure . The color shows
the relative height of the topographical features, with different
scales used for different times in (a) to highlight the evolving interfacial
roughness. The same scale of 50 nm between red and blue regions is
used in all images shown in (b).
Snapshots of atomic configurations
predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target irradiated in vacuum by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2. The irradiation
conditions correspond to the regime of phase explosion. Only a part
of the computational system from −220 to 500 nm with respect
to the initial surface of the target is shown in the snapshots. The
atoms are colored according to their potential energies, from blue
for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase Ag atoms.Snapshots of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target irradiated in water by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2. The irradiation
conditions correspond to the regime of phase explosion confined by
the water environment. Only a part of the computational system from
−200 to 440 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target
is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according to their
potential energies, from blue for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase
Ag atoms. The molecules representing water environment are blanked,
and the presence of water is illustrated schematically by a light
blue region above the Ag target.Density (a,b), temperature (c), and pressure (d) contour plots
predicted in simulations of a bulk Ag target irradiated by a 100 fs
laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 400 mJ/cm2in vacuum (a) and in water (b–d).
The blue line shows the location of the melting and solidification
fronts. In (b–d), the two black lines outline the water–Ag
mixing region defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag
atoms are present. The blue (b,c) and red (d) dot background represents
the presence of water beyond the pressure-transmitting boundary applied
at the top of the water layer explicitly simulated with coarse-grained
MD. Corresponding snapshots from the simulations are shown in Figure for (a) and Figure for (b–d).Topographic images of the interface between
the hot metal layer
and water shown for the simulation illustrated by snapshots in Figure . The color shows
the relative height of the topographical features, with different
scales used for different times in (a) to highlight the evolving interfacial
roughness. The same scale of 50 nm between red and blue regions is
used in all images shown in (b).The presence of a liquid environment drastically alters the
dynamics
of the formation and expansion of the ablation plume generated in
the phase explosion irradiation regime, as can be seen from the simulation
snapshots and the density contour plot shown in Figures and 9b, respectively.
The superheated molten metal that, in vacuum, undergoes an explosive
decomposition into small droplets and vapor is now confined by water
and is collected into a dense hot layer that pushes the water away
from the target. The temperature and pressure profiles, shown in Figures c and 9d, indicate that the dense layer is initially brought into
the supercritical state. The layer grows as the foamy subsurface region
of the Ag target expands (Figure ), and more melted and vapor phase Ag joins the layer.
The colder molten Ag joining the top layer from the bottom is largely
responsible for the rapid decrease of the average temperature of the
layer that can be seen from Figure c.Note that despite the visual similarity of
the subsurface void
evolution in Figures and 8 the main driving forces behind the
void generation in the two simulations are different, as can be clearly
seen from Figures a and 6c. In the spallation regime, at the
absorbed fluence of 150 mJ/cm2, the sharp increase of the
number of subsurface voids coincides with the time when the tensile
stress, depicted by a blue line in Figure a, is generated in the corresponding region
of the target. At the higher fluence of 400 mJ/cm2, the
superheated top layer confined by the water environment remains at
positive pressure during the time when the sharp increase in the number
of voids is observed (Figure c). This suggests that, similarly to the simulation in vacuum
discussed above and illustrated by Figures and 9a, the phase
decomposition in the top part of the Ag target is mainly driven by
the release of vapor and can be described as an explosive homogeneous
boiling.[98−100] In contrast to the free expansion of the
ablation plume in vacuum, however, the ejected material now accumulates
into a hot layer at the interface with the water environment and exerts
an outward force pushing the water away from the target, as shown
in Figures and 9b–d.The water in contact with the
hot metal layer formed by the ablation
plume accumulation is rapidly heated to the supercritical state and
provides an environment suitable for quenching and condensation of
metal atoms emitted from the metal layer into the water. Note that
while the temperature shown in the temperature contour plot for the
water–Ag mixing region outlined by two black lines (Figures c) is the result
of averaging over water and Ag present in this region, the two components
of the mixture are far from thermal equilibrium with each other. For
example, the average temperatures of Ag and water present in the mixing
region at a time of 600 ps are 2665 and 1120 K, respectively. This
lack of thermal equilibrium, combined with the relatively high pressure
maintained in the mixing region by the dynamic metal–water
interaction (Figure d), keeps the thermodynamic conditions in the mixing region far from
the ones required for the onset of thermal decomposition of water,
as evaluated in calculation with the software package FactSage.[127]The large temperature difference between
the water and metal in
the mixing region, on the other hand, facilitates the rapid condensation,
cooling, and freezing of the metal nanoparticles. As has been shown
in earlier simulations of thin-film ablation,[74] the condensation of metal vapor in the mixing region leads to the
formation and freezing of small (mostly ≤10 nm) nanoparticles
on the time scale of several nanoseconds. The beginning of this process
can already be seen in the last snapshots shown in Figure . At a later time, beyond the
time scale of the simulation, the water–silver mixing region,
outlined by two black lines in Figure b–d, is expected to grow and to evolve into
a low-density vapor region (cavitation bubble) expanding under the
action of water vapor pressure.Although by the end of the simulation,
1.2 ns, the average temperature
of the hot metal layer is below the limit of stability with respect
to the phase explosion, it is more than double the melting point of
Ag and is only 36% below the threshold for the phase explosion at
zero pressure.[75] The layer may slowly cool
due to the interaction with water, evaporation, and, if the bridges
connecting the layer to the bulk of the target remain, through the
heat conduction to the target. It is quite likely, however, that the
hot metal layer would rupture and disintegrate into large liquid droplets
due to the inherent instability of thin liquid films,[79,128,129] the dynamic interaction of the
liquid metal layer with the expanding and collapsing vapor bubble,
and the emergence of Rayleigh–Taylor instability at the metal–water
interface. The latter mechanism is responsible for the rapid development
of complex morphology of the metal–water interface that can
be seen from snapshots shown in Figure and plays an important role in the layer decomposition.
Therefore, the origin of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability is
discussed in more detail in the next section.The onset of the
nucleation and growth of small nanoparticles in
the metal–water mixing region and the likely breakup of the
hot metal layer into large droplets represent two distinct mechanisms
of the nanoparticle formation that are likely to yield nanoparticles
of two different size ranges. This computational prediction is consistent
with the observation of bimodal nanoparticle size distributions in
femtosecond PLAL experiments,[15,16] where small nanoparticles
with sizes less than or around ten nanometers are found to coexist
with larger (tens to hundreds of nanometers) ones. The high computational
cost of large-scale atomistic simulations, the limited lateral size
of the computational cell, and the relatively long time scales associated
with both of the aforementioned mechanisms prevent us from directly
observing the nanoparticle formation in the simulation discussed in
this section. Faster generation of the nanoparticles through the same
two mechanisms, however, has been observed in simulations of PLAL
of thin films,[74] ablation of bulk targets
at a higher fluence (to be reported elsewhere), and second pulse ablation
of targets modified by the first pulse (discussed in Section ).
Rayleigh–Taylor
Instability at the
Metal–Water Interface
One of the key processes that
may lead (or contribute) to the disintegration of the molten metal
layer generated due to the confinement of the ablation plume by the
water environment is the development of Rayleigh–Taylor instability
at the metal–water interface. The rapid deceleration of the
denser metal layer by the pressure exerted from the lighter supercritical
water creates conditions corresponding to the classical picture of
the Rayleigh–Taylor instability, where the acceleration of
the interface and density gradient have the same directions. The fastest
growing wavelength λm and the characteristic time
τ of the exponential growth of small perturbations in the Rayleigh–Taylor
instability can be estimated based on the linear stability analysis
applied to inviscid fluids[130,131]where k = 2π/λm is the wave vector; A = (ρml – ρw)/(ρml + ρw) is
the Atwood number; ρml and ρw are
the densities of the heavier and lighter
fluids (metal layer and supercritical water); σ is the interfacial
tension; and G is the effective acceleration of the
interface in the direction pointing into the heavier fluid.In the simulation of PLAL discussed in the previous section, the
deceleration of the metal layer by the water overlayer can be seen
from the density contour plot shown in Figure b. The deceleration is not constant but rapidly
changes from the maximum value of ∼7 × 1012 m/s2 recorded at 40 ps down to 1.6 × 1012 m/s2 at 300 ps and then to 3.0 × 1011 m/s2 by the end of the first nanosecond after the laser
pulse. The densities of the compressed supercritical water, ρw, and the hot metal layer, ρml, are also
changing during the simulation. These changes, however, are relatively
small, and average values of ρw = 1.2 g/cm3 and ρml = 7 g/cm3 are used in the estimations
of λm and τ. The temperature dependence of
the interfacial tension is also neglected, and the value of σ
= 0.09 J/m2 evaluated for the model Ag–water system
at 1800 K using the test-area simulation method[132] is adopted in the estimations. Using these parameters in eqs and 2, we obtain λm = 33.9 nm and τ = 85 ps for
the layer deceleration of 1.6 × 1012 m/s2 at 300 ps and λm = 78.3 nm and τ = 297 ps
for the lower deceleration of 3.0 × 1011 m/s2 at 1 ns.To compare the above estimations with the results
of the simulation
discussed in the previous section, the evolution of morphology of
the interface is shown in Figure for the same moments of time for which the snapshots
are shown in Figure . In a semiquantitative agreement with the theoretical estimations,
the initial fine roughness of the interface with characteristic spatial
dimension on the order of several nanometers appears as early as 100
ps and gradually evolves into a coarser interface morphology with
characteristic length scale of several tens of nanometers. The observation
of the emergence of the nanoscale interface morphology on the time
scale of hundreds of picoseconds through the Rayleigh–Taylor
instability is in agreement with the results of earlier MD simulations[133,134] and is a clear indication that nanoscale hydrodynamic instability
is likely to play an important role in the nanoparticle generation
in PLAL. Indeed, in recent simulations of thin metal film ablation
in liquids,[74] the Rayleigh–Taylor
instability has been shown to result in disintegration of a molten
metal layer and generation of large droplets. Another demonstration
of the key role of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability in the generation
of large metal nanoparticles in PLAL is provided in the next section.Note that the initial development of the interface roughness due
to the Rayleigh–Taylor instability and the subsequent nonlinear
evolution of the interface morphology are sensitive to the viscosity,
density ratio, and the variation of the acceleration of the two fluid
layers. This sensitivity suggests that the characteristics of the
nanoparticles generated through the Rayleigh–Taylor instability
at the plume–liquid environment interface can be, to a certain
extent, controlled by choosing the ablation target, liquid environment,
and irradiation parameters.
Generation of Nanoparticles
by the Second
Pulse Irradiation
The results of the simulations discussed
in Section predict
that the final structure of a surface region of a target irradiated
in the regime of spallation confined by liquid environment, below
the threshold for nanoparticle formation, is essentially a thin metal
layer loosely connected to the bulk of the target by thin walls and
bridges, similar to the configuration shown for a partially solidified
target in the last snapshot in Figure . The formation of porous surface morphology is also
possible at higher fluences, in the phase explosion regime discussed
in section , when
the hot metal layer generated at the front of the ablation plume (e.g., Figure ) does not disintegrate
into nanoparticles but cools due to the interaction with liquid environment
and heat conduction to the bulk of the target. The irradiation of
such targets by a subsequent laser pulse would result in spatial localization
of the deposited laser energy within the top surface layer of the
target and may lead to a substantial reduction of the threshold fluence
for the generation of nanoparticles. Thus, the presence of large subsurface
voids can facilitate generation of nanoparticles in the multipulse
irradiation regime at fluences that do not produce nanoparticles upon
irradiation with a single pulse, leading to the so-called incubation
effect. The incubation effect has been extensively studied for vacuum
conditions,[135−139] and as shown in a recent computational study,[80] the generation of subsurface voids may be one of the mechanisms
responsible for the incubation. The response of a target with subsurface
voids to the irradiation in a liquid environment, when the material
expansion is suppressed by the presence of the liquid overlayer, however,
has not been investigated so far.To explore the effect of the
presence of subsurface voids on the microscopic mechanisms of pulsed
laser ablation in liquids, a sample mimicking a frozen film connected
to the bulk of the target by thin bridges is constructed based on
the predictions of the simulations discussed in Sections and 3.2. The top part of the sample is shown in the first frame of Figure . The sample is
irradiated by a laser pulse with duration of τL =
100 fs and absorbed fluence of Fabs =
300 mJ/cm2, which is below the threshold for the generation
of large nanoparticles in a single pulse laser irradiation in water.
Figure 11
Snapshots
of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The irradiation conditions correspond to the regime of phase
explosion confined by the water environment. Only a part of the computational
system from −180 to 400 nm with respect to the initial surface
of the target is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according
to their potential energies, from blue for solid Ag to green for molten
Ag and red for vapor-phase Ag atoms. The molecules representing water
environment are blanked, and the presence of water is illustrated
schematically by a light blue region above the Ag target. Animated
sequence of snapshots from this simulation with a time resolution
of 100 ps is provided as Supporting Information for this article.
Snapshots
of atomic configurations predicted in a simulation of
a bulk Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The irradiation conditions correspond to the regime of phase
explosion confined by the water environment. Only a part of the computational
system from −180 to 400 nm with respect to the initial surface
of the target is shown in the snapshots. The atoms are colored according
to their potential energies, from blue for solid Ag to green for molten
Ag and red for vapor-phase Ag atoms. The molecules representing water
environment are blanked, and the presence of water is illustrated
schematically by a light blue region above the Ag target. Animated
sequence of snapshots from this simulation with a time resolution
of 100 ps is provided as Supporting Information for this article.The results of the simulation
are illustrated by a series of snapshots
shown in Figure , which reveals rich dynamics of the superheated material undergoing
an explosive decomposition into liquid and vapor. The deposition of
laser energy is largely localized within the top thin layer that covers
the underlying void. The superheated layer undergoes phase explosion
and expands in both directions, as schematically shown by the two
arrows on the density contour plot in Figure a. Similar to the simulation discussed in section , the upward
expansion of the top part of the film is decelerated by the water
environment, and the products of the phase explosion (Ag vapor and
small clusters) are accumulated at the plume–water interface
forming a hot metal layer. The downward expansion of the bottom part
of the film results in a rapid collapse of the void within the first
∼40 ps after the laser pulse and is followed by formation of
two vortexes on both sides of the thin wall that connected the initial
top layer with the bulk of the target, as depicted in Figure . The heating and lateral
compression of the thin wall by the colliding vortexes rapidly melt
and accelerate the wall material in the vertical direction, leading
to the disintegration of the wall by ∼1 ns (Figure ). The rebound of the hot
plume from the wall leads to the formation of low-density vapor regions
near the wall by 200 ps (Figures and 13) and accumulation of
the material in the central part of the original void (snapshot for
500 ps in Figure ). The net result of the complex material flow dynamics illustrated
in Figure is the
overall upward acceleration (rebound) of the lower part of the plume
from the bulk of the target, as shown by the lower arrow in Figure a.
Figure 12
Density (a) and temperature
(b) contour plots predicted in a simulation
of a bulk Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The two black lines outline the water–Ag mixing region
defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag atoms are present.
The blue dot background in the upper left corners of the plots represents
the presence of water beyond the pressure-transmitting boundary applied
at the top of the water layer explicitly simulated with coarse-grained
MD. The two dashed orange arrows in (a) show schematically the colliding
trajectories of the hot molten layer generated at the interface with
water environment and a colder molten layer approaching it from the
bottom. The two horizontal dashed red lines outline the region for
which snapshots of atomic configurations are shown in Figure .
Figure 13
Snapshots of atomic configurations (left column) and fields of
the material flow velocities (right column) highlighting the void
collapse and vortex formation in a simulation of a bulk Ag target
with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100
fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. Only
a part of the computational system from −100 to −180
nm with respect to the initial surface of the target is shown in the
snapshots. The atoms in the snapshots are colored according to their
potential energies, from blue for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase
Ag atoms. The magnitude of the flow velocities is shown by color with
scale provided at the bottom of the figure.
Density (a) and temperature
(b) contour plots predicted in a simulation
of a bulk Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The two black lines outline the water–Ag mixing region
defined as a region where both water molecules and Ag atoms are present.
The blue dot background in the upper left corners of the plots represents
the presence of water beyond the pressure-transmitting boundary applied
at the top of the water layer explicitly simulated with coarse-grained
MD. The two dashed orange arrows in (a) show schematically the colliding
trajectories of the hot molten layer generated at the interface with
water environment and a colder molten layer approaching it from the
bottom. The two horizontal dashed red lines outline the region for
which snapshots of atomic configurations are shown in Figure .
Figure 14
Snapshots of the evolution of the hot
metal layer–water
interface predicted in a simulation of a bulk Ag target with a subsurface
void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse
at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The snapshots are
shown for a part of the computational system from 150 to 350 nm with
respect to the initial surface of the target (i.e., the region outlined
by two dashed red lines in Figure ) and for a time interval when several large (10s of
nm in diameter) nanoparticles are ejected from the hot metal layer
into the water environment. In the upper row, the atoms in the snapshots
are colored according to their potential energies, from green for
molten Ag to red for individual Ag atoms. In the lower row, the atoms
are colored by nanoparticle ID defined by the contribution of atoms
to one of the eight large nanoparticles ejected into the water environment
via the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (each color except gray
corresponds to atoms that end up in one of the eight nanoparticles).
The molecules representing water environment are blanked in all snapshots.
Snapshots of atomic configurations (left column) and fields of
the material flow velocities (right column) highlighting the void
collapse and vortex formation in a simulation of a bulk Ag target
with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100
fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. Only
a part of the computational system from −100 to −180
nm with respect to the initial surface of the target is shown in the
snapshots. The atoms in the snapshots are colored according to their
potential energies, from blue for molten Ag to red for vapor-phase
Ag atoms. The magnitude of the flow velocities is shown by color with
scale provided at the bottom of the figure.The rebounded material moves up and eventually makes an impact
on the floating molten layer formed by accumulation of the upper part
of the phase explosion plume at the interface with the water environment.
The impact occurs at ∼800 ps and results in the formation of
several nanojets rapidly extending into the water environment. These
nanojets elongate toward the colder water region and rupture to produce
large droplets/nanoparticles with diameters on the order of tens of
nanometers. A total of eight large nanoparticles are formed through
the breakup of multiple liquid nanojets, with some of the nanojets
producing more than one nanoparticle, as can be seen from the snapshots
in Figure that are focused on the metal–water interface
(region between two dashed red lines in Figure ) and the time span when the nanojets are
generated. The diameters and the corresponding numbers of atoms in
the eight large nanoparticles at a time of 2.5 ns are as follows:
15.8 nm (119 909 atoms), 14.3 nm (89 496 atoms), 13.1
nm (67 936 atoms), 12.3 nm (57 349 atoms), 11.1 nm (41 683
atoms), 11.0 nm (40 799 atoms), 10.0 nm (30 761 atoms),
and 9.8 nm (29 073 atoms).Snapshots of the evolution of the hot
metal layer–water
interface predicted in a simulation of a bulk Ag target with a subsurface
void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse
at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The snapshots are
shown for a part of the computational system from 150 to 350 nm with
respect to the initial surface of the target (i.e., the region outlined
by two dashed red lines in Figure ) and for a time interval when several large (10s of
nm in diameter) nanoparticles are ejected from the hot metal layer
into the water environment. In the upper row, the atoms in the snapshots
are colored according to their potential energies, from green for
molten Ag to red for individual Ag atoms. In the lower row, the atoms
are colored by nanoparticle ID defined by the contribution of atoms
to one of the eight large nanoparticles ejected into the water environment
via the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (each color except gray
corresponds to atoms that end up in one of the eight nanoparticles).
The molecules representing water environment are blanked in all snapshots.The lower row of snapshots in Figure shows the origin
of atoms that end up in
each of the eight nanoparticles. It can be seen that before the impact
from the rebounded material all the atoms that contribute to the large
nanoparticles are already present inside the liquid layer and are
mostly located within the trough regions of the layer, suggesting
that the roughness of the interface plays an essential role in the
formation of the nanoparticles. Moreover, consideration of an overlap
of the shapes of the interface before and after the rebounded materials
impact (700 and 1100 ps, respectively), shown in Figure , clearly demonstrates that
the liquid nanojets are ejected out from the trough areas of the interface.
Figure 15
Result
of the surface reconstruction performed for the hot metal
layer–water interface that can be seen in the snapshots in Figures and 14. The overlapped view of two surfaces reconstructed
for 700 and 1100 ps is shown in the lower part of the figure, with
the surface for 1100 ps colored using gray scale.
Result
of the surface reconstruction performed for the hot metal
layer–water interface that can be seen in the snapshots in Figures and 14. The overlapped view of two surfaces reconstructed
for 700 and 1100 ps is shown in the lower part of the figure, with
the surface for 1100 ps colored using gray scale.As discussed in Section , the initial roughness of the water–metal interface
is produced through the Rayleigh–Taylor instability of the
interface undergoing strong deceleration directed from the lighter
supercritical water toward the heavier hot metal layer. By applying
analysis described in Section and using the values of deceleration and densities
measured at 500 ps after the laser pulse in eqs and 2, the wavelength
and time scale of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability are estimated
to be λm = 64.2 nm and τ = 200 ps. These values
are in a reasonable semiquantitative agreement with the interface
roughness that can be seen in the snapshots shown for 200 and 500
ps in Figure .With the formation of the roughened water–metal interface
serving as the first step in the generation of large nanoparticles,
the second step is the emission of nanojets induced by the backside
impact of the rebounded material. The formation of the nanojets can
be described in terms of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability that
occurs when a shock wave impinges a roughened interface between materials
of different density.[140] The shock-driven
inversion of the initial surface perturbations and formation of jets
extending into lower-density medium have been analyzed theoretically[141,142] and investigated in atomistic and hydrodynamic simulations.[143−145] The location of the nanojets and the dynamic material redistribution
from the troughs of the interface to the nanojets are consistent with
the results of the prior studies. Finally, the extension of the nanojets
results in the separation of droplets in a process that can be attributed
to the capillary (Plateau–Rayleigh) instabilities driven by
the surface tension,[146,147] with water environment certainly
playing an important role in defining the dynamics of the nanojet
extension and separation of the droplets.The new mechanism
of the nanoparticle generation revealed in the
simulation and discussed above demonstrates that the nucleation and
growth from the vapor phase, which is also observed in this simulation
(see discussion below and Figure ), is not the only possible channel of nanoparticle
generation at the early stage of PLAL. While the cascade of the hydrodynamic
instabilities responsible for the ejection of the eight nanoparticles
into the water environment in the present simulation may look somewhat
exotic, the results of the simulations performed for other systems
suggest that it is not unique to the target with subsurface voids.
In particular, a similar phenomenon has also been observed in a simulation
of high fluence short pulse laser ablation of a void-free bulk Ag
target in water (to be reported elsewhere), where a spalled layer
coming from the deeper part of the target and joining the hot metal
layer formed at the interface with the water environment provides
the external impact that leads to the jetting and generation of large
nanoparticles. Moreover, the roughening of the metal–water
interface through the Rayleigh–Taylor instability combined
with the general limited stability of thin liquid films[79,128,129] may result in direct production
of large nanoparticles, as have been observed in a recent simulation
of laser ablation of a thin Ag film in water.[74]
Figure 16
Results of the cluster analysis applied to the Ag content of the
Ag–water mixing region generated in a simulation of a bulk
Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The cumulative number of individual Ag atoms and small clusters
with diameters less than 1 nm (orange) and the cumulative numbers
of atoms that belong to nanoparticles of different sizes (above 1
nm) are shown in (a). The number of atoms in atomic clusters and nanoparticles
of different sizes are shown as histograms for 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 ns
in (b). The number of nanoparticles of different sizes is also shown
for the same moments of time in (c).
Results of the cluster analysis applied to the Ag content of the
Ag–water mixing region generated in a simulation of a bulk
Ag target with a subsurface void irradiated in water by a 100 fs laser pulse at an absorbed fluence of 300 mJ/cm2. The cumulative number of individual Ag atoms and small clusters
with diameters less than 1 nm (orange) and the cumulative numbers
of atoms that belong to nanoparticles of different sizes (above 1
nm) are shown in (a). The number of atoms in atomic clusters and nanoparticles
of different sizes are shown as histograms for 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 ns
in (b). The number of nanoparticles of different sizes is also shown
for the same moments of time in (c).As mentioned above, another general mechanism of nanoparticle
generation
observed in the simulation is the nucleation and growth from the Ag
vapor in the low-density mixing region generated due to the interaction
of water with the hot metal layer and evaporation of Ag atoms from
the metal layer. The expanding metal–water mixing region is
outlined by two black lines in Figure . As seen from Figure b, the average temperature in the mixing
regions, while staying above the critical temperature of water, is
close to and, in the upper part, even below the melting temperature
of Ag. Hence, the vapor Ag atoms rapidly condense, forming small nanoparticles
(up to several nanometers in diameter) on a very short time scale
of just several nanoseconds after the laser irradiation. Moreover,
some of the nanoparticles located in the upper part of the mixing
region solidify on the time scale of the simulation, 2.5 ns. The kinetics
of nanoparticle formation through the nucleation and growth in the
mixing region is illustrated in Figure and discussed below.The analysis
of the evolution of sizes of the metal clusters and
nanoparticles in the mixing region is performed with a cluster identification
algorithm applied to atomic configurations generated in the simulation
between 100 and 2500 ps, with a 100 ps interval. The eight large nanoparticles
separated from the liquid nanojets are not considered in this analysis.
The evolution of the cumulative number of Ag atoms present above the
liquid layer as individual atoms (vapor) and small atomic clusters
with diameters below 1 nm (less than 30 atoms) as well as the larger
clusters that we denote as nanoparticles is shown in Figure a. While the total number
of Ag atoms in the mixing region steadily increases due to the continuous
evaporation from the hot molten metal layer, the number of atoms in
the Ag vapor and atomic clusters stays at approximately the same level
starting from 1 ns, and the increase in the total number of Ag atoms
in the mixing region is largely sustained by the growing populations
of nanometer-scale nanoparticles. Note that the number of vapor-phase
atoms and atomic clusters shows an apparent drop at around 800 ps,
when the mixing region undergoes a transient compression due to the
impact of the rebounded material from the backside of the hot metal
layer (Figure ).
The compression makes some of the ejected metal atoms rejoin the metal
layer, as suggested by the small temporal drop of the total number
of Ag atoms in the mixing region, but also facilitates the condensation
of vapor and coalescence of clusters into the nanoparticles. Overall,
the nanoparticle size distribution broadens and shifts to the larger
sizes as time progresses, as can be seen from the nanoparticle size
distributions shown in Figure b,c. While the growth of the nanoparticles is still
ongoing at the end of the simulation, the size of the nanoparticles
generated through the nucleation and growth in the metal–water
mixing region can be expected to mostly remain below 10 nm. This size
is consistent with experimental observation of the generation of small
(<10 nm) nanoparticles in femtosecond laser ablation of gold[15] and silver[148] targets
in pure water. An inspection of the enlarged view of the metal–water
mixing region shown in Figure a indicates that the largest nanoparticles formed through
the nucleation and growth are mostly found in the middle part of the
mixing region, where the sufficiently low temperature of the water
environment and the high Ag vapor concentration provide the optimum
conditions for condensation into Ag nanoparticles.
Figure 17
(a) Snapshot of a part
of the final atomic configuration (from
120 to 350 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target) and
the corresponding plots of water and silver densities (blue dashed
and green solid curves, respectively) in the simulation illustrated
by Figures –16. The atoms in the snapshot are colored by their
potential energies, from blue for solid Ag to green for molten Ag
and to red for vapor-phase Ag atoms. The molecules representing water
environment are blanked in the snapshot. Five out of eight large (10s
of nanometers) nanoparticles generated via Rayleigh–Taylor
and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities had already crystallized
by the end of the simulation and are indexed in the snapshot. The
structure of three of these five nanoparticles is shown in (b), where
the atoms are colored according to their local structural environment,
so that the fcc, hcp, and bcc atoms are green, red, and blue, respectively,
while the atoms that belong to the crystal defects and surfaces are
blanked. The time dependence of the average temperature of atoms that
end up in the five nanoparticles indexed in (a) is shown in (c).
(a) Snapshot of a part
of the final atomic configuration (from
120 to 350 nm with respect to the initial surface of the target) and
the corresponding plots of water and silver densities (blue dashed
and green solid curves, respectively) in the simulation illustrated
by Figures –16. The atoms in the snapshot are colored by their
potential energies, from blue for solid Ag to green for molten Ag
and to red for vapor-phase Ag atoms. The molecules representing water
environment are blanked in the snapshot. Five out of eight large (10s
of nanometers) nanoparticles generated via Rayleigh–Taylor
and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities had already crystallized
by the end of the simulation and are indexed in the snapshot. The
structure of three of these five nanoparticles is shown in (b), where
the atoms are colored according to their local structural environment,
so that the fcc, hcp, and bcc atoms are green, red, and blue, respectively,
while the atoms that belong to the crystal defects and surfaces are
blanked. The time dependence of the average temperature of atoms that
end up in the five nanoparticles indexed in (a) is shown in (c).An important characteristic of
the nanoparticle generation in PLAL,
common to both mechanisms revealed in the simulations, is the rapid
quenching of the nanoparticles inside the water–metal mixing
region. The interaction between the hot metal vapor and water not
only brings the water to the supercritical state but also rapidly
cools the metal vapor and nanoparticles down to the temperature that
can be sufficiently low to cause solidification of large nanoparticles.
As one can see from Figure a, the small nanoparticles in the upper part of the mixing
region are colored blue, indicating the low level of potential energy
that is characteristic of the crystalline state. Indeed, similarly
to the small nanoparticles generated through the nucleation and growth
in the earlier simulation of PLAL of a thin Ag film,[74] the small nanoparticles in the upper part of the mixing
region are found to crystallize within the first nanoseconds after
the laser pulse.The larger nanoparticles produced from the
droplets separated from
the nanojets also experience a very rapid quenching and solidification.
Indeed, five of the nanoparticles labeled as 1 to 5 in Figure a are already solidified by
the end of the simulation. The nanojets generated through the Richtmyer–Meshkov
instability of the roughened interface are launching the droplets
past the low-density part of the mixing region directly into the denser
and colder water environment, as can be seen from the density plots
shown in Figure a. The droplets then quickly cool and solidify through the interaction
with water. The thermal history of the material contributing to the
five nanoparticles injected into the dense water region is shown in Figure c, where the effective
cooling rate in excess of 1012 K/s is observed. The high
cooling rate is enabled by the suppression of the formation of an
insulating vapor layer around the hot droplets by the high curvatures
of the droplet–water interfaces, an effect that has been demonstrated
in MD simulations of heat transfer from hot nanoparticles to a surrounding
liquid.[149,150] As a result, very high heat fluxes from
the hot droplets to the water environment are sustained, the metal
droplets are strongly undercooled, and the crystallization of the
nanoparticles is activated within just several hundreds of picoseconds.
A similar time scale of crystallization has recently been reported
in MD simulations of the solidification of ZnO nanoparticles in a
liquid environment.[151]The structural
analysis of the frozen nanoparticles reveals polycrystalline
structure with multiple stacking faults, twin boundaries, and pentagonal
twinned domains, as well as platelets of metastable hcp structure,
as illustrated by images of three nanoparticles shown in Figure b. A similar complex
nanostructure has been observed in a frozen nanospike generated in
a simulation of laser spallation of a Ag target[81] and attributed to the highly nonequilibrium nature of the
rapid nucleation and growth of new crystallites that takes place under
conditions of deep undercooling,[80,81] along with
the low stacking-fault energy of Ag.[152] The polycrystalline structure has also been experimentally observed
in Ag nanoparticles generated in femtosecond pulse laser ablation
of a solid Ag target in water,[148] i.e.,
for conditions similar to the ones used in the present simulations.
In general, the ultrafast quenching and solidification rates suggest
that PLAL can be an effective technique to generate nanoparticles
with highly nonequilibrium metastable structures and phases.The computational prediction of the existence of two distinct mechanisms
of nanoparticle formation is consistent with experimental observations
of bimodal nanoparticle size distributions in femtosecond PLAL[15,16] and can be related to the results of recent time-resolved SAXS probing
of the cavitation bubble dynamics,[63−66] where two groups of nanoparticles,
with different characteristic sizes, have been observed to emerge
at different stages of the bubble evolution. The SAXS experiments
are performed with nanosecond laser pulses, where the formation of
the hot molten metal layer at the interface with the liquid environment
and the corresponding production of larger “secondary”
nanoparticles through the breakup of the molten layer still await
verification in the simulations. Nevertheless, the “primary”
nanoparticles with sizes below 10 nm are likely to be generated through
the same mechanism as the small nanoparticles in the simulations,
i.e., the rapid nucleation and growth in the expanding mixing region.
The recent experimental confirmation that both primary and secondary
nanoparticles are present at the early stage of the cavitation bubble
expansion[66] is providing an additional
support to this association between the computational predictions
and experimental observations.
Summary
Large-scale atomistic simulations are used in this work to investigate
the physical mechanisms and processes responsible for the modification
of surface structure and generation of nanoparticles in short pulse
laser interactions with bulk metal targets in a liquid environment.
The simulations are performed with a computational model combining
a coarse-grained representation of liquid (parametrized for water),
a fully atomistic description of laser interactions with metal targets,
and acoustic impedance matching boundary conditions designed to mimic
nonreflecting propagation of laser-induced pressure waves through
the boundaries of the computational domain. The model is implemented
in a computationally efficient parallel code, which is used to perform
a series of simulations of femtosecond pulse laser ablation and processing
of bulk Ag targets. The results of the simulations performed in the
irradiation regimes that correspond to photomechanical spallation
and phase explosion in vacuum have revealed the strong effect of the
liquid environment on the modification of surface regions of the irradiated
targets and generation of nanoparticles of different sizes. The main
findings of the computational study are summarized below.1. Generation of large subsurface voids and surface swelling: For the irradiation conditions that correspond to the spallation
regime in vacuum, the simulations performed in water predict that
the interaction with water environment can prevent the complete separation
of spalled molten layer from the target, resulting in the formation
of much larger frozen-in subsurface voids as compared to ones observed
in simulations performed close to the spallation threshold in vacuum.
Moreover, the confinement by liquid environment can significantly
broaden the fluence range for the formation of large subsurface voids,
produce more extensive surface swelling, and result in the formation
of unique surface morphologies.2. Phase explosion under
liquid confinement—buildup
of a hot metal layer at the front of the ablation plume:
The simulations performed at higher laser fluences, that correspond
to the phase explosion regime in vacuum, reveal the accumulation of
the ablation plume at the interface with the water environment and
formation of a hot metal layer. The water in contact with the metal
layer is brought to the supercritical state, expands, and absorbs
metal atoms emitted from the hot metal layer. The expanding low density
metal–water mixing region provides an environment suitable
for rapid nucleation and growth of small metal nanoparticles and serves
as a precursor for the formation of a cavitation bubble.3. Hydrodynamic instabilities and disintegration of the
metal layer: The hot metal layer generated due to the confinement
of the ablation plume by the liquid environment has limited stability
and can readily disintegrate into large (tens of nanometers) nanoparticles.
The layer disintegration is facilitated by Rayleigh–Taylor
instability of the interface between the higher density metal layer
decelerated by the pressure from the lighter supercritical water,
which creates an extensive nanoscale surface roughness of the interface
on a time scale of hundreds of picoseconds. Moreover, the backside
impact of the material joining the hot molten layer at a later time
can induce Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of the roughened interface
and result in the formation of nanojets launching large droplets through
the low-density mixing region directly into denser and colder water
environment.4. Bimodal nanoparticle size distribution: Rapid
nucleation and growth of small nanoparticles in the metal–water
mixing region and the breakup of the hot metal layer into larger droplets
due to the hydrodynamic instabilities represent two distinct mechanisms
of the nanoparticle formation that yield nanoparticles of two different
size ranges as early as several nanoseconds after the laser irradiation.
This computational prediction provides a plausible explanation for
experimental observations of bimodal nanoparticle size distributions
in femtosecond PLAL experiments.5. Rapid quenching
and solidification of nanoparticles: The thermodynamic conditions
in the expanding metal–water
mixing region not only facilitate rapid nucleation and growth of metal
clusters and nanoparticles but also ensure highly efficient cooling
and solidification of the nanoparticles that are found to crystallize
within the first nanoseconds after the laser pulse. The larger nanoparticles
produced through the hot molten metal layer disintegration and injected
into the water environment are also rapidly cooled and solidified,
with cooling rates in excess of 1012 K/s observed in the
simulations. The ultrahigh cooling and solidification rates suggest
the possibility for generation of nanoparticles featuring metastable
phases and highly nonequilibrium structures.6. Incubation
effect in multipulse laser ablation: The generation of subsurface
voids or, at higher fluences, an extended
porous surface morphology can strongly modify the processes induced
by subsequent laser pulses applied to the same area on the target.
Spatial localization of the deposited laser energy within the top
surface layer partially insulated from the bulk of the target by the
subsurface voids is shown to result in a substantial reduction of
the threshold fluence for the explosive material disintegration and
generation of nanoparticles. The reduction of the threshold for the
material ablation and nanoparticle generation can be related to the
incubation effect in the multipulse laser ablation in liquids.Overall, the first atomistic simulations of laser ablation of bulk
metal targets in water have provided important insights into the complex
phenomenon of laser–material interactions in liquid environment
and revealed an array of mechanisms and processes that are unique
for laser ablation in liquids. The emerging understanding of laser-induced
processes is likely to facilitate the intelligent design of new PLAL
setups capable of controlled generation of nanoparticles and surface
structures characterized by unusual nonequilibrium structure and phase
composition.
Authors: Mikhail E Povarnitsyn; Tatiana E Itina; Pavel R Levashov; Konstantin V Khishchenko Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Christoph Rehbock; Jurij Jakobi; Lisa Gamrad; Selina van der Meer; Daniela Tiedemann; Ulrike Taylor; Wilfried Kues; Detlef Rath; Stephan Barcikowski Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 3.649