| Literature DB >> 28798347 |
Jong Youl Lee1,2, Eun Ae Jeong1,2, Kyung Eun Kim1,2, Chin-Ok Yi1,2, Zhen Jin1,2, Jung Eun Lee3, Dong Hoon Lee1, Hyun Joon Kim1,2, Sang Soo Kang1, Gyeong Jae Cho1, Wan Sung Choi1,2, Soo Youn Choi4, H Moo Kwon4, Gu Seob Roh5,6.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that overexpression of tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein (TonEBP) is associated with many inflammatory diseases, including diabetes mellitus, which causes neuroinflammation in the hippocampus as well as hepatic steatosis. However, the exact mechanism in diabetic neuroinflammation is unknown. We report that haploinsufficiency of TonEBP inhibits hepatic and hippocampal high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) expression in diabetic mice. Here, mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 16 weeks and received an intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ) and followed by continued HFD feeding for an additional 4 weeks to induce hyperglycemia and hepatic steatosis. Compared with wild-type diabetic mice, diabetic TonEBP+/- mice showed decreased body weight, fat mass, hepatic steatosis, and macrophage infiltration. We also found that adipogenesis and HMGB1 expression in the liver and hippocampus were lower in diabetic TonEBP+/- mice compared with the wild type. Furthermore, iba-1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus was decreased in diabetic TonEBP+/- mice compared with that in the wild type. Our findings suggest that TonEBP haploinsufficiency suppresses diabetes-associated hepatic steatosis and neuroinflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28798347 PMCID: PMC5552681 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08319-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Changes of body weight and metabolic characteristics in HFD/STZ-treated TonEBP+/− mice. (a) Body weights of mice for 20 weeks. Body weight (b), fat mass (c), body fats (d), GTT (e), areas under the curve (AUC) of GTT (f), ITT (g), and AUC of ITT (h) of WT and TonEBP+/− mice with or without HFD/STZ treatment were compared. (i) Serum insulin was measured by an ELISA kit. HOMR-IR was calculated from fasting serum glucose and insulin. Data (n = 10 mice per group) are shown as the mean ± SEM. (j) Representative images showing immunofluorescence of insulin (red) in pancreatic sections. Scale bar = 50 μm. (k) Percentage areas of insulin-positive cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice.
Figure 2Effects of TonEBP haploinsufficiency on hepatic steatosis in HFD/STZ-treated mice. (a) Representative micrographs of H&E and Nile red staining; scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Percentages of Nile red-positive areas. (c) Concentrations of hepatic TG (n = 7–8 mice per group). Western blotting and quantification of nuclear LXRβ (d), SREBP-1 (e), and PPARα (f) in the livers. The mean values were obtained from three separate experiments (n = 6 mice per group). Cropped blots are displayed here and full-length blots are included in the Supplementary Information. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice.
Figure 3Hepatic TonEBP, HMGB1, IL-6, and TNF-α expression in HFD/STZ-treated TonEBP+/− mice. (a) Representative micrographs of TonEBP-immunostained liver sections; scale bar = 50 μm. Western blots and protein quantification of hepatic TonEBP (b), HMGB1 (c), IL-6 (d), and TNF-α (e). The mean values were obtained from at least three independent experiment (n = 6 mice per group). Cropped blots are displayed here and full-length blots are included in the Supplementary Information. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice.
Figure 4Hippocampal TonEBP expression in HFD/STZ-treated TonEBP+/− mice. Western blots and protein quantification of total (a) and nuclear (b) TonEBP in the hippocampus. The mean values were obtained from three separate experiments (n = 6 mice per group). Cropped blots are displayed here and full-length blots are included in the Supplementary Information. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice. (c) Representative micrographs of TonEBP immunoreactivity in the hippocampus. TonEBP labeling resembles fine sand grains. The boxed areas of a’, b’, c’, and d’ are magnified on the right. Scale bar = 25 μm (inset, 5 μm). (d) The intensity of TonEBP immunoreactivity in the hippocampus was measured and presented as the fold change. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice.
Figure 5Effects of TonEBP haploinsufficiency on HMGB1, IL-6, and TNF-α expression in the hippocampus of HFD/STZ-treated mice. (a) Western blots and protein quantification of nuclear HMGB1 in the hippocampus. (b) Representative micrographs of HMGB1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus. The boxed areas of a’, b’, c’, and d’ are magnified on the right. Scale bar = 25 μm (inset, 5 μm). (c) The intensity of HMGB1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus was measured and presented as the fold change. (d) Western blots and protein quantification of hippocampal IL-6 and TNF-α. The mean values were obtained from three separate experiments (n = 6 mice per group). Cropped blots are displayed here and full-length blots are included in the Supplementary Information. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice.
Figure 6Effects of TonEBP haploinsufficiency on iba1 expression in the hippocampus of HFD/STZ-treated mice. Representative micrographs of iba1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampal CA3 (a) and CA1 (b) regions. The intensity of iba1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampal CA3 (c) and CA1 (d) regions was measured and presented as the fold change. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. control (CTL) normal diet-fed mice; † P < 0.05 vs. DM WT mice. Scale bar = 50 μm.