Literature DB >> 28798289

Prolonged Administration of Twice-Daily Bolus Intravenous Tacrolimus in the Early Phase After Lung Transplantation.

Yutaka Hirano1, Seiichiro Sugimoto1, Toshifumi Mano1, Takeshi Kurosaki2, Kentaroh Miyoshi1, Shinji Otani2, Masaomi Yamane1, Motomu Kobayashi3, Shinichiro Miyoshi1, Takahiro Oto2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although administration of tacrolimus, whether by the enteric, sublingual, or continuous intravenous routes, has some limitations, twice-daily bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration has been shown to be beneficial in optimizing efficacy and safety after lung transplantation. However, at present, the duration of bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration is limited, and the effects of prolonged bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration remain unknown. Our study was aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of prolonged twice-daily bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration in the early phase after lung transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively investigated the data of 62 recipients of lung transplantation who had received twice-daily bolus intravenous administration of tacrolimus, followed by oral tacrolimus, after lung transplantation at our institution between January 2011 and October 2015. RESULTS The median duration of bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration was 19 days (4-72 days). The target trough level was achieved in 89% of the patients by day 3. Acute kidney injury occurred in 27% of the patients during bolus intravenous tacrolimus. Two patients (3%) had neurotoxicity, necessitating discontinuation of tacrolimus. Suspected acute rejection requiring steroid pulse therapy occurred in 21% of patients during the follow-up period. Eight patients (13%) developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction during the follow-up period. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates after lung transplantation were 95% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that prolonged bolus intravenous tacrolimus administration in the early phase after lung transplantation is a safe and effective alternative to enteric, sublingual, or continuous intravenous administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28798289     DOI: 10.12659/aot.904225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  4 in total

1.  Airway complications have a greater impact on the outcomes of living-donor lobar lung transplantation recipients than cadaveric lung transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Seiichiro Sugimoto; Masaomi Yamane; Shinji Otani; Takeshi Kurosaki; Shuji Okahara; Yukiko Hikasa; Shinichi Toyooka; Motomu Kobayashi; Takahiro Oto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  The Evolution of Lung Transplant Immunosuppression.

Authors:  Steven Ivulich; Glen Westall; Michael Dooley; Gregory Snell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Feasibility of lung transplantation from donors mechanically ventilated for prolonged periods.

Authors:  Seiichiro Sugimoto; Takeshi Kurosaki; Shinji Otani; Shin Tanaka; Yukiko Hikasa; Masaomi Yamane; Shinichi Toyooka; Motomu Kobayashi; Takahiro Oto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Donor-derived cell-free DNA is associated with acute rejection and decreased oxygenation in primary graft dysfunction after living donor-lobar lung transplantation.

Authors:  Shin Tanaka; Seiichiro Sugimoto; Takeshi Kurosaki; Kentaroh Miyoshi; Shinji Otani; Ken Suzawa; Shinsuke Hashida; Masaomi Yamane; Takahiro Oto; Shinichi Toyooka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.