| Literature DB >> 28798011 |
Mathew Parackal1, Sherly Parackal2, Shobhit Eusebius1, Damien Mather1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media is gaining recognition as a platform for delivering public health messages. One area attracting attention from public health researchers and professionals is Facebook's advertising channel. This channel is reported to have a broad reach and generate high user engagement with the disseminated campaign materials. However, to date, no study has examined the communication process via this channel which this study aimed to address.Entities:
Keywords: New Zealand; alcohol; health promotion; pregnancy; social media
Year: 2017 PMID: 28798011 PMCID: PMC5571231 DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.7032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill ISSN: 2369-2960
Metadata for the campaign posting.
| Posting | Number of comments | Likes | Shares | Views |
| Don’t Know? Don’t Drink (video) | 146 | 1281 | 92 | 203,754 |
| Missed a pill? Maybe? (ad #1) | 330 | 2127 | 101 | N/Aa |
| You used a condom, right? (ad #2) | 250 | 1714 | 69 | N/A |
| Definitely, definitely not pregnant? (ad #3) | 86 | 1003 | 38 | N/A |
| Don't Know? Don't Drink profile thumbnail | 7 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Total | 819 | 6125 | 300 | 203,754 |
aN/A: not applicable.
Themes and their corresponding keywords.
| Labels | Term cut-off | Keywords | Comment cut-off | Number of archetypesa | Exemplarb |
| Risk of pregnancy | 0.317 | sex, pregnancy, woman, mean, contraception | 0.318 | 67 | “...No contraception is 100%. What a dumb ad” |
| Alcohol and culture | 0.320 | wine, eat, raw, fish, pregnancy, | 0.331 | 69 | “Explain all the European pregnant women who drink wine on a daily basis because it’s a cultural habit...?” |
| Credibility of the campaign | 0.288 | stop, stupid, risk, drink, problem | 0.278 | 49 | “What a stupid campaign, everything has ‘risks’ but this just seems like a big fat waste of time.” |
| Contraceptionfailure | 0.319 | pill, miss, condom, time, period | 0.352 | 35 | “...The ad should be ‘missed a pill? wear a condom’(or probably get him to wear one hahaha)” |
aThe number of comments with meaning-making theme information weight above a critical level.
bExemplars are snippets of the archetypes with the highest information weight for that meaning-making theme.
Association between the meaning-making themes and message.
| Parameter | Degrees of freedom | Estimate | Standard error | Wald χ2 | Exp (Est) | |
| Intercept | 1 | −1.1058 | 0.2693 | 16.86 | <.001 | 0.331 |
| Risk of pregnancy | 1 | 0.7782 | 0.2629 | 8.76 | .003 | 2.177 |
| Alcohol and culture | 1 | 1.1161 | 0.2588 | 18.60 | <.001 | 3.053 |
Probability of the message provoking a message-reflective response.
| Parameter | Probability |
| Without any meaning-making | 0.25 (0.331/1+0.331) |
| Risk of pregnancy cognition | 0.42 (0.331×2.177/1+0.331×2.177) |
| Alcohol and culture cognition | 0.50 (0.331×3.053)/1+(0.331×3.053) |
| All related cognition | 0.69 (0.332×2.177×3.053)/1+(0.332×2.177×3.053) |
Sentiment analysis of comments in the two themes.
| Meaning making themes | Positive comments | Neutral comments | Negative comments |
| Risk of pregnancy | 15 (23) | 18 (27) | 33 (50) |
| Alcohol and culture | 23 (34) | 15 (22) | 30 (44) |
| Total | 38 (28) | 33 (25) | 63 (47) |