Literature DB >> 28797940

Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life.

Elisabeth Huynh1, Joanna Coast2, John Rose3, Philip Kinghorn4, Terry Flynn5.   

Abstract

End of life care may have elements of value that go beyond health. A generic measure of the benefits of end of life care could be helpful to decision makers. Such a measure, based on the capability approach, has recently been developed: the ICECAP Supportive Care Measure. This paper reports the first valuation exercise for that measure, with data from 6020 individuals collected from an on-line general population panel during June 2013. Individuals were asked to complete a stated choice experiment that combined best-worst scaling and a standard discrete choice experiment. Analysis of the best-worst data used limited dependent variable models within the random utility framework including the multinomial logit models and latent class choice model analysis. Exploratory steps were taken to determine the similarity of the best-worst and DCE data before formal testing and pooling of the two data sources. Combined data were analysed in a heteroscedastic conditional logit model adjusting for continuous scale. Two sets of tariffs were generated, one from the best-worst data capturing only main effects, and a second from the pooled data allowing for two-way interactions. Either tariff could be used in economic evaluation of interventions at the end of life, although there are advantages and disadvantages with each. This extensive valuation exercise for the ICECAP Supportive Care Measure, with a large number of members of the general public, could be complemented in the future with best-worst scaling studies amongst those experiencing the end of life.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best-worst scaling; Capability; Discrete choice experiment; End of life; ICECAP measures; Measurement; UK; Wellbeing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28797940     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Assessing capability in economic evaluation: a life course approach?

Authors:  Joanna Coast
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08

2.  Once Bitten Twice Shy: Thinking Carefully Before Adopting the EQ-5D-5L.

Authors:  Jeff Round
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Does the relative importance of the OxCAP-MH's capability items differ according to mental ill-health experience?

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Alexander Kaltenboeck; Josef Baumgartner; Franz Mayrhofer; Georg Heinze; Andreas Sönnichsen; Johannes Wancata; Judit Simon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  An analysis of the construct validity and responsiveness of the ICECAP-SCM capability wellbeing measure in a palliative care hospice setting.

Authors:  Gareth Myring; Paul Mark Mitchell; W George Kernohan; Sonja McIlfatrick; Sarah Cudmore; Anne M Finucane; Lisa Graham-Wisener; Alistair Hewison; Louise Jones; Joanne Jordan; Laurie McKibben; Deborah H L Muldrew; Shazia Zafar; Joanna Coast
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.113

5.  A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.

Authors:  Katherine Froggatt; Ashley Best; Frances Bunn; Girvan Burnside; Joanna Coast; Lesley Dunleavy; Claire Goodman; Ben Hardwick; Clare Jackson; Julie Kinley; Anne Davidson Lund; Jennifer Lynch; Paul Mitchell; Gareth Myring; Shakil Patel; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Nancy Preston; David Scott; Kate Silvera; Catherine Walshe
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Joshua Byrnes; Richard Norman; Paul A Scuffham; Martin Downes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-04

7.  "It is not a scientific number it is just a feeling": Populating a multi-dimensional end-of-life decision framework using deliberative methods.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Cara Bailey; Alastair Canaway; Philip Kinghorn
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Cancer patients' needs assessment in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), economic evaluation and normalisation process theory evaluation of the needs assessment tool cancer (CANAssess).

Authors:  Joseph Clark; Bethan Copsey; Alexandra Wright-Hughes; Emma McNaught; Petra Bijsterveld; Terry McCormack; Robbie Foy; Scott Wilkes; Jon Mark Dickson; David Meads; Amanda Farrin; Miriam Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Assessing the capability to experience a 'good death': A qualitative study to directly elicit expert views on a new supportive care measure grounded in Sen's capability approach.

Authors:  Philip Kinghorn; Joanna Coast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adaptation, Acceptance and Adaptive Preferences in Health and Capability Well-Being Measurement Amongst Those Approaching End of Life.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Cara Bailey; Rosanna Orlando; Kathy Armour; Rachel Perry; Louise Jones; Philip Kinghorn
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.