Manabu Kawata1, Yusuke Sasabuchi2, Hiroshi Inui3, Shuji Taketomi1, Hiroki Matsui4, Kiyohide Fushimi5, Hirotaka Chikuda6, Hideo Yasunaga4, Sakae Tanaka1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: INUIH-ORT@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp. 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Health Informatics and Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various nationwide studies have reported differing annual trends in utilization of knee arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy. Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, the present series examined annual trends and demographics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and tibial osteotomy. METHODS: All patients were identified who underwent TKA, UKA or tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee between July 2007 and March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 170,433 cases of TKA, 13,209 cases of UKA and 8760 cases of tibial osteotomy were identified. The proportion of patients undergoing UKA rose from 4.0% in 2007 to 8.1% in 2014 (P<0.001), and that of tibial osteotomy from 2.6% in 2007 to 5.5% in 2014 (P<0.001); the proportion undergoing TKA fell from 93.4% in 2007 to 86.3% in 2014 (P<0.001). Between 2007 and 2014 the proportions of patients with osteonecrosis who underwent UKA and tibial osteotomy increased from 34.7% and 11.6% to 38.6% and 16.2%, respectively (P=0.001 for UKA and P=0.004 for tibial osteotomy). The proportions of patients with osteonecrosis undergoing UKA or tibial osteotomy were significantly greater than those with other diagnoses (P<0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The popularity of UKA and tibial osteotomy in Japan increased during the period 2007-2014 at the expense of TKA. The proportions of UKA and tibial osteotomy in patients with osteonecrosis also increased, and were larger than those in patients with other causative diseases.
BACKGROUND: Various nationwide studies have reported differing annual trends in utilization of knee arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy. Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, the present series examined annual trends and demographics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and tibial osteotomy. METHODS: All patients were identified who underwent TKA, UKA or tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee between July 2007 and March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 170,433 cases of TKA, 13,209 cases of UKA and 8760 cases of tibial osteotomy were identified. The proportion of patients undergoing UKA rose from 4.0% in 2007 to 8.1% in 2014 (P<0.001), and that of tibial osteotomy from 2.6% in 2007 to 5.5% in 2014 (P<0.001); the proportion undergoing TKA fell from 93.4% in 2007 to 86.3% in 2014 (P<0.001). Between 2007 and 2014 the proportions of patients with osteonecrosis who underwent UKA and tibial osteotomy increased from 34.7% and 11.6% to 38.6% and 16.2%, respectively (P=0.001 for UKA and P=0.004 for tibial osteotomy). The proportions of patients with osteonecrosis undergoing UKA or tibial osteotomy were significantly greater than those with other diagnoses (P<0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The popularity of UKA and tibial osteotomy in Japan increased during the period 2007-2014 at the expense of TKA. The proportions of UKA and tibial osteotomy in patients with osteonecrosis also increased, and were larger than those in patients with other causative diseases.
Authors: Lawrence Chun Man Lau; Elvis Chun Sing Chui; Jason Chi Ho Fan; Gene Chi Wai Man; Yuk Wah Hung; Kevin Ki Wai Ho; Kwong Yin Chung; Samuel Yik Cheung Wan; Jack Wai Wang Chau; Patrick Shu Hang Yung; Mohit Bhandari Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.692