O Grøtta1, T Enden2, G Sandbæk3, G F Gjerdalen4, C-E Slagsvold4, D Bay2, N-E Kløw3, A Rosales5. 1. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: o.j.grotta@medisin.uio.no. 2. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 3. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 4. Section of Vascular Investigations, Department of Vascular Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Aker, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Vascular Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: The objective was to assess the technical success, patency, and clinical outcome after stent placement for chronic obstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of patients with chronic IVC obstruction verified with computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance venography, accepted for stent placement at the Norwegian National Unit for Reconstructive Deep Venous Surgery from March 2010 to September 2015. Clinical status was categorized according to the CEAP classification and symptom severity was assessed using venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Stent patency was evaluated by colour duplex ultrasound. Large -diameter Wallstents were placed in the IVC and concurrent iliac and femoral obstructions via right internal jugular and femoral vein access. Sixteen patients presented with symptoms of chronic venous disease. Four patients had symptoms assumed to be related to a reduced cardiac preload. Twelve patients had IVC occlusion and eight had stenosis. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 3-70 months). RESULTS: Stent placement in the IVC was successful in 19 of 20 patients. Primary patency after 24 months was 67% and secondary patency 83%. Fifteen of 19 patients had open stents at final follow-up. Re-interventions were performed in four patients and included catheter directed thrombolysis in all and adjunctive stenting in three. Thirteen of 19 patients (68%) reported a sustained and significant clinical improvement. Mean VCSS improved from 8.5 (range 3-25) at baseline to 7 (range 2-23) at final follow-up (p = .007). There were no peri-procedural or long-term complications. CONCLUSION: The endovascular approach with stent placement for chronic IVC obstruction is a safe treatment option that should be offered to patients who otherwise have little opportunity for sustained clinical improvement.
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: The objective was to assess the technical success, patency, and clinical outcome after stent placement for chronic obstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of patients with chronic IVC obstruction verified with computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance venography, accepted for stent placement at the Norwegian National Unit for Reconstructive Deep Venous Surgery from March 2010 to September 2015. Clinical status was categorized according to the CEAP classification and symptom severity was assessed using venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Stent patency was evaluated by colour duplex ultrasound. Large -diameter Wallstents were placed in the IVC and concurrent iliac and femoral obstructions via right internal jugular and femoral vein access. Sixteen patients presented with symptoms of chronic venous disease. Four patients had symptoms assumed to be related to a reduced cardiac preload. Twelve patients had IVC occlusion and eight had stenosis. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 3-70 months). RESULTS: Stent placement in the IVC was successful in 19 of 20 patients. Primary patency after 24 months was 67% and secondary patency 83%. Fifteen of 19 patients had open stents at final follow-up. Re-interventions were performed in four patients and included catheter directed thrombolysis in all and adjunctive stenting in three. Thirteen of 19 patients (68%) reported a sustained and significant clinical improvement. Mean VCSS improved from 8.5 (range 3-25) at baseline to 7 (range 2-23) at final follow-up (p = .007). There were no peri-procedural or long-term complications. CONCLUSION: The endovascular approach with stent placement for chronic IVC obstruction is a safe treatment option that should be offered to patients who otherwise have little opportunity for sustained clinical improvement.