Literature DB >> 2879736

Pharmacologic evaluation of loratadine (SCH 29851), chlorpheniramine and placebo.

R L Batenhorst, A S Batenhorst, D A Graves, T S Foster, M Kung, R P Gural, H J Amkraut.   

Abstract

The antihistaminic effect of loratadine (160 mg) was compared in twenty-four normal male volunteers to chlorpheniramine maleate (4 mg) and placebo in a double blinded 3-way cross-over study of latin square design. After receiving single oral doses of each medication, the wheal response to serial 0.1 ml intradermal histamine (2 micrograms) and saline (control) injections were recorded over a 24-h period. The calculated wheal areas were compared to base-line measurements. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance. Loratadine exhibited a more pronounced inhibition of histamine wheal formation than placebo or chlorpheniramine maleate (p less than 0.003). In contrast to chlorpheniramine maleate which had a duration of action of only 3 h, loratadine inhibited the response for the entire observation period between 1 and 24 h post-dose. Although sedation was observed less frequently with loratadine (Placebo, n = 2; chlorpheniramine, n = 3; and loratadine, n = 1), the relative incidence were not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2879736     DOI: 10.1007/bf00606669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  4 in total

1.  The evaluation of histamine antagonists in man.

Authors:  A S Fowle; D T Hughes; G J Knight
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A new approach to the use of histamine skin tests in the study of antihistamine drugs.

Authors:  L Joubert; Z Gaut; W B Abrams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1969 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness.

Authors:  A W Peck; A S Fowle; C Bye
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-08-14       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Evaluation of the CNS properties of SCH 29851, a potential non-sedating antihistamine.

Authors:  A Barnett; L C Iorio; W Kreutner; S Tozzi; H S Ahn; A Gulbenkian
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1984-06
  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimum pharmacological management of chronic rhinitis.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Comparative tolerability of second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  F Horak; U P Stübner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  S P Clissold; E M Sorkin; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.