Literature DB >> 28796916

Fragrance contact allergens in 5588 cosmetic products identified through a novel smartphone application.

N H Bennike1, N B Oturai2, S Müller2, C S Kirkeby2, C Jørgensen2, A B Christensen2, C Zachariae3, J D Johansen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 25% of the adult European population suffers from contact allergy, with fragrance substances recognized as one of the main causes. Since 2005, 26 fragrance contact allergens have been mandatory to label in cosmetic products within the EU if present at 10 ppm or above in leave-on and 100 ppm or above in wash-off cosmetics.
OBJECTIVE: To examine exposure, based on ingredient labelling, to the 26 fragrances in a sample of 5588 fragranced cosmetic products.
METHODS: The investigated products were identified through a novel, non-profit smartphone application (app), designed to provide information to consumers about chemical substances in cosmetic products. Products registered through the app between December 2015 and October 2016 were label checked according to International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI) for the presence of the 26 fragrance substances or the wording 'fragrance/parfum/aroma'.
RESULTS: The largest product categories investigated were 'cream, lotion and oil' (n = 1192), 'shampoo and conditioner' (n = 968) and 'deodorants' (n = 632). Among cosmetic products labelled to contain at least one of the 26 fragrances, 85.5% and 73.9% contained at least two and at least three of the 26 fragrances, respectively. Linalool (49.5%) and limonene (48.5%) were labelled most often among all investigated products. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC/Lyral® ) was found in 13.5% of deodorants. Six of the 26 fragrance substances were labelled on less than one per cent of all products, including the natural extracts Evernia furfuracea (tree moss) and Evernia prunastri (oak moss). A total of 329 (5.9%) products had one or more of the 26 fragrance substances labelled but did not have 'parfum/fragrance/aroma' listed on the label.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers are widely exposed to, often multiple, well-established fragrance contact allergens through various cosmetic products intended for daily use. Several fragrance substances that are common causes of contact allergy were rarely labelled in this large sample of cosmetic products.
© 2017 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28796916     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

1.  Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?

Authors:  Sabrina Hartmann; Ursula Klaschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.893

Review 2.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin; Ian R White
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparison of a Barcode-Based Smartphone Application to a Questionnaire to Assess the Use of Cleaning Products at Home and Their Association with Asthma Symptoms.

Authors:  Pierre Lemire; Sofia Temam; Sarah Lyon-Caen; Catherine Quinot; Etienne Sévin; Sophie Remacle; Karine Supernant; Rémy Slama; Orianne Dumas; Valérie Siroux; Nicole Le Moual; The Sepages Study Group
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.