Importance: Systemic inflammation and sarcopenia are easily evaluated, predict mortality in many cancers, and are potentially modifiable. The combination of inflammation and sarcopenia may be able to identify patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) with poor prognosis. Objective: To examine associations of prediagnostic systemic inflammation with at-diagnosis sarcopenia, and determine whether these factors interact to predict CRC survival, adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, stage, and cancer site. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort of 2470 Kaiser Permanente patients with stage I to III CRC diagnosed from 2006 through 2011. Exposures: Our primary measure of inflammation was the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We averaged NLR in the 24 months before diagnosis (mean count = 3 measures; mean time before diagnosis = 7 mo). The reference group was NLR of less than 3, indicating low or no inflammation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using computed tomography scans, we calculated skeletal muscle index (muscle area at the third lumbar vertebra divided by squared height). Sarcopenia was defined as less than 52 cm2/m2 and less than 38 cm2/m2 for normal or overweight men and women, respectively, and less than 54 cm2/m2 and less than 47 cm2/m2 for obese men and women, respectively. The main outcome was death (overall or CRC related). Results: Among 2470 patients, 1219 (49%) were female; mean (SD) age was 63 (12) years. An NLR of 3 or greater and sarcopenia were common (1133 [46%] and 1078 [44%], respectively). Over a median of 6 years of follow-up, we observed 656 deaths, 357 from CRC. Increasing NLR was associated with sarcopenia in a dose-response manner (compared with NLR < 3, odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67 for NLR 3 to <5; 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.85 for NLR ≥ 5; P for trend < .001). An NLR of 3 or greater and sarcopenia independently predicted overall (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.91 and HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.53, respectively) and CRC-related death (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.12 and HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.78, respectively). Patients with both sarcopenia and NLR of 3 or greater (vs neither) had double the risk of death, overall (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.70-2.65) and CRC related (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.79-3.29). Conclusions and Relevance: Prediagnosis inflammation was associated with at-diagnosis sarcopenia. Sarcopenia combined with inflammation nearly doubled risk of death, suggesting that these commonly collected biomarkers could enhance prognostication. A better understanding of how the host inflammatory/immune response influences changes in skeletal muscle may open new therapeutic avenues to improve cancer outcomes.
Importance: Systemic inflammation and sarcopenia are easily evaluated, predict mortality in many cancers, and are potentially modifiable. The combination of inflammation and sarcopenia may be able to identify patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) with poor prognosis. Objective: To examine associations of prediagnostic systemic inflammation with at-diagnosis sarcopenia, and determine whether these factors interact to predict CRC survival, adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, stage, and cancer site. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort of 2470 Kaiser Permanente patients with stage I to III CRC diagnosed from 2006 through 2011. Exposures: Our primary measure of inflammation was the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We averaged NLR in the 24 months before diagnosis (mean count = 3 measures; mean time before diagnosis = 7 mo). The reference group was NLR of less than 3, indicating low or no inflammation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using computed tomography scans, we calculated skeletal muscle index (muscle area at the third lumbar vertebra divided by squared height). Sarcopenia was defined as less than 52 cm2/m2 and less than 38 cm2/m2 for normal or overweight men and women, respectively, and less than 54 cm2/m2 and less than 47 cm2/m2 for obesemen and women, respectively. The main outcome was death (overall or CRC related). Results: Among 2470 patients, 1219 (49%) were female; mean (SD) age was 63 (12) years. An NLR of 3 or greater and sarcopenia were common (1133 [46%] and 1078 [44%], respectively). Over a median of 6 years of follow-up, we observed 656 deaths, 357 from CRC. Increasing NLR was associated with sarcopenia in a dose-response manner (compared with NLR < 3, odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67 for NLR 3 to <5; 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.85 for NLR ≥ 5; P for trend < .001). An NLR of 3 or greater and sarcopenia independently predicted overall (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.91 and HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.53, respectively) and CRC-related death (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.12 and HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.78, respectively). Patients with both sarcopenia and NLR of 3 or greater (vs neither) had double the risk of death, overall (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.70-2.65) and CRC related (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.79-3.29). Conclusions and Relevance: Prediagnosis inflammation was associated with at-diagnosis sarcopenia. Sarcopenia combined with inflammation nearly doubled risk of death, suggesting that these commonly collected biomarkers could enhance prognostication. A better understanding of how the host inflammatory/immune response influences changes in skeletal muscle may open new therapeutic avenues to improve cancer outcomes.
Authors: Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Carla M Prado; Patrick T Bradshaw; Andrew J Dannenberg; Marilyn L Kwan; Jingjie Xiao; Charles Quesenberry; Erin K Weltzien; Adrienne L Castillo; Bette J Caan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arnoud J Templeton; Olga Ace; Mairéad G McNamara; Mustafa Al-Mubarak; Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Thomas Hermanns; Boštjan Seruga; Alberto Ocaña; Ian F Tannock; Eitan Amir Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lisa Martin; Laura Birdsell; Neil Macdonald; Tony Reiman; M Thomas Clandinin; Linda J McCargar; Rachel Murphy; Sunita Ghosh; Michael B Sawyer; Vickie E Baracos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Colin H Richards; Campbell S D Roxburgh; Mark T MacMillan; Sanad Isswiasi; Ewen G Robertson; Graeme K Guthrie; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica J Hopkins; Rebecca Reif; David Bigam; Vickie E Baracos; Dean T Eurich; Michael M Sawyer Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jeffery Chakedis; Gaya Spolverato; Eliza W Beal; Ingrid Woelfel; Fabio Bagante; Katiuscha Merath; Steven H Sun; Aaron Chafitz; Jason Galo; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Carla M Prado; Stacey Alexeeff; Candyce H Kroenke; Patrick Bradshaw; Charles P Quesenberry; Erin K Weltzien; Adrienne L Castillo; Taiwo A Olobatuyi; Wendy Y Chen Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jingjie Xiao; Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Candyce H Kroenke; Vickie E Baracos; Erin Weltzien; Marilyn L Kwan; Stacey E Alexeeff; Adrienne L Castillo; Carla M Prado Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Mehmet Asim Bilen; Dylan J Martini; Yuan Liu; Julie M Shabto; Jacqueline T Brown; Milton Williams; Amir I Khan; Alexandra Speak; Colleen Lewis; Hannah Collins; Haydn T Kissick; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet Akce; Walid L Shaib; Olatunji B Alese; Rathi N Pillai; Conor E Steuer; Christina S Wu; David H Lawson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Bassel F El-Rayes; Suresh S Ramalingam; Taofeek K Owonikoko; R Donald Harvey; Viraj A Master Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-12-05
Authors: Saunjoo L Yoon; Oliver Grundmann; Joseph J Williams; Samuel S Wu; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Zhiguang Huo; Thomas J George Journal: Acupunct Med Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: M P Petrova; I S Donev; M A Radanova; M I Eneva; E G Dimitrova; G N Valchev; V T Minchev; M S Taushanova; M V Boneva; T S Karanikolova; R B Gencheva; G A Zhbantov; A I Ivanova; C V Timcheva; B P Pavlov; V G Megdanova; B S Robev; N V Conev Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 4.330