Su Min Ha1, Eun Young Chae2, Joo Hee Cha2, Hak Hee Kim2, Hee Jung Shin2, Woo Jung Choi2. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the relationships between the BRCA mutation types, imaging features, and pathologic findings of breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with breast cancer with BRCA gene mutations from January 2000 to December 2014. After excluding patients who underwent lesion excision before MRI, 99 BRCA1 and 103 BRCA2 lesions in 187 women (mean age, 39.7 and 40.4 years, respectively) were enrolled. Mammographic, sonographic, and MRI scans were reviewed according to the BI-RADS lexicon (5th edition). Pathologic data were reviewed, including the immunohistochemistry findings. The relationships between the BRCA mutations and both imaging and pathologic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The distribution of molecular subtypes of tumors significantly differed by the mutation type. BRCA1 tumors were associated with the triple-negative subtype, whereas BRCA2 tumors were associated with the luminal B subtype (p = 0.002). At MRI, breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations exhibited a circumscribed margin (p = 0.032) and rim enhancement (p = 0.013). No significant differences in mass shape or kinetic features were observed at MRI. Cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers tended to develop in the posterior location in the breast (p = 0.034). At mammography, no significant difference in the prevalence of calcifications was observed according to the mutation type. At sonography, BRCA1 lesions were found to be associated with posterior acoustic enhancement (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations tend to exhibit benign morphologic features at MRI, mammography, and sonography, compared with BRCA2 mutations. Lesion location may represent another difference on imaging among various genetic phenotypes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the relationships between the BRCA mutation types, imaging features, and pathologic findings of breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with breast cancer with BRCA gene mutations from January 2000 to December 2014. After excluding patients who underwent lesion excision before MRI, 99 BRCA1 and 103 BRCA2 lesions in 187 women (mean age, 39.7 and 40.4 years, respectively) were enrolled. Mammographic, sonographic, and MRI scans were reviewed according to the BI-RADS lexicon (5th edition). Pathologic data were reviewed, including the immunohistochemistry findings. The relationships between the BRCA mutations and both imaging and pathologic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The distribution of molecular subtypes of tumors significantly differed by the mutation type. BRCA1 tumors were associated with the triple-negative subtype, whereas BRCA2tumors were associated with the luminal B subtype (p = 0.002). At MRI, breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations exhibited a circumscribed margin (p = 0.032) and rim enhancement (p = 0.013). No significant differences in mass shape or kinetic features were observed at MRI. Cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers tended to develop in the posterior location in the breast (p = 0.034). At mammography, no significant difference in the prevalence of calcifications was observed according to the mutation type. At sonography, BRCA1 lesions were found to be associated with posterior acoustic enhancement (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:Breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations tend to exhibit benign morphologic features at MRI, mammography, and sonography, compared with BRCA2 mutations. Lesion location may represent another difference on imaging among various genetic phenotypes.
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Laura C Collins; Yaileen D Guzmán-Arocho; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Judy E Garber; Hilde Vardeh; Philip D Poorvu; Kathryn J Ruddy; Gregory Kirkner; Craig Snow; Rulla M Tamimi; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Lidia Schapira; Virginia F Borges; Steven E Come; Elena F Brachtel; Jonathan D Marotti; Ellen Warner Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: G Kenneth Gray; Carman Man-Chung Li; Jennifer M Rosenbluth; Laura M Selfors; Nomeda Girnius; Jia-Ren Lin; Ron C J Schackmann; Walter L Goh; Kaitlin Moore; Hana K Shapiro; Shaolin Mei; Kurt D'Andrea; Katherine L Nathanson; Peter K Sorger; Sandro Santagata; Aviv Regev; Judy E Garber; Deborah A Dillon; Joan S Brugge Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 13.417
Authors: Katie M Marker; Valentina A Zavala; Tatiana Vidaurre; Paul C Lott; Jeannie Navarro Vásquez; Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano; Mónica Calderón; Julio E Abugattas; Henry L Gómez; Hugo A Fuentes; Ruddy Liendo Picoaga; Jose M Cotrina; Silvia P Neciosup; Carlos A Castañeda; Zaida Morante; Fernando Valencia; Javier Torres; Magdalena Echeverry; Mabel E Bohórquez; Guadalupe Polanco-Echeverry; Ana P Estrada-Florez; Silvia J Serrano-Gómez; Jenny A Carmona-Valencia; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Alejandro Velez; Jorge Donado; Sikai Song; Daniel Cherry; Lizeth I Tamayo; Scott Huntsman; Donglei Hu; Roberto Ruiz-Cordero; Ronald Balassanian; Elad Ziv; Jovanny Zabaleta; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Laura Fejerman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Georgia Vasileiou; Maria J Costa; Christopher Long; Iris R Wetzler; Juliane Hoyer; Cornelia Kraus; Bernt Popp; Julius Emons; Marius Wunderle; Evelyn Wenkel; Michael Uder; Matthias W Beckmann; Sebastian M Jud; Peter A Fasching; Alexander Cavallaro; André Reis; Matthias Hammon Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: M B I Lobbes; J Hecker; I P L Houben; R Pluymakers; C Jeukens; U C Laji; S Gommers; J E Wildberger; P J Nelemans Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eduardo Costa; Tânia Ferreira-Gonçalves; Miguel Cardoso; João M P Coelho; Maria Manuela Gaspar; Pedro Faísca; Lia Ascensão; António S Cabrita; Catarina Pinto Reis; Isabel V Figueiredo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.923