Literature DB >> 28796503

Effect of Processing on the in Vitro and in Vivo Protein Quality of Yellow and Green Split Peas (Pisum sativum).

Matthew G Nosworthy1, Adam J Franczyk1, Gerardo Medina1, Jason Neufeld1, Paulyn Appah2, Alphonsus Utioh2, Peter Frohlich3, James D House1.   

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of extrusion, baking, and cooking on the protein quality of yellow and green split peas, a rodent bioassay was conducted and compared to an in vitro method of protein quality determination. The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of green split peas (71.4%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67.8%), on average. Similarly, the average Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of green split peas (69%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67%). Cooked green pea flour had lower PDCAAS and DIAAS values (69.19% and 67%) than either extruded (73.61%, 70%) or baked (75.22%, 70%). Conversely, cooked yellow split peas had the highest PDCCAS value (69.19%), while extruded yellow split peas had the highest DIAAS value (67%). Interestingly, a strong correlation was found between in vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality (R2 = 0.9745). This work highlights the differences between processing methods on pea protein quality and suggests that in vitro measurements of protein digestibility could be used as a surrogate for in vivo analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIAAS; Extrusion; PDCAAS; PER; baking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28796503     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  8 in total

1.  Amino Acid Profiles in Peach (Prunus persica L.) Fruit.

Authors:  Meng Sun; Bintao Zhao; Zhixiang Cai; Juan Yan; Ruijuan Ma; Mingliang Yu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-12

2.  Determination of the protein quality of almonds (Prunus dulcis L.) as assessed by in vitro and in vivo methodologies.

Authors:  James D House; Kristen Hill; Jason Neufeld; Adam Franczyk; Matthew G Nosworthy
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Comparative Study of Early- and Mid-Ripening Peach (Prunus persica L.) Varieties: Biological Activity, Macro-, and Micro- Nutrient Profile.

Authors:  Dasha Mihaylova; Aneta Popova; Ivelina Desseva; Nadezhda Petkova; Magdalena Stoyanova; Radka Vrancheva; Anton Slavov; Alexandar Slavchev; Anna Lante
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-14

4.  Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Scores (DIAAS) of Six Cooked Chinese Pulses.

Authors:  Fei Han; Paul J Moughan; Juntao Li; Shaojie Pang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Protein Quality Changes of Vegan Day Menus with Different Plant Protein Source Compositions.

Authors:  Zaray Rojas Conzuelo; Natalie S Bez; Steffen Theobald; Katrin A Kopf-Bolanz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Legume Seed Protein Digestibility as Influenced by Traditional and Emerging Physical Processing Technologies.

Authors:  Ikenna C Ohanenye; Flora-Glad C Ekezie; Roghayeh A Sarteshnizi; Ruth T Boachie; Chijioke U Emenike; Xiaohong Sun; Ifeanyi D Nwachukwu; Chibuike C Udenigwe
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 7.  Microalgae as Sources of High-Quality Protein for Human Food and Protein Supplements.

Authors:  Yanwen Wang; Sean M Tibbetts; Patrick J McGinn
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 8.  Advanced and feasible pulses processing technologies for Ethiopia to achieve better economic and nutritional goals: A review.

Authors:  Tadesse Fikre Teferra
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.