Literature DB >> 2879554

Assessment of a ternary model for the binding of agonists to neurohumoral receptors.

T W Lee, M J Sole, J W Wells.   

Abstract

A frequently cited variant of the "mobile receptor" hypothesis has been examined for its ability to describe the binding of agonists at neurohumoral receptors that operate via a guanylyl nucleotide binding protein. The model involves a reversible association between the receptor (R) and the G protein (G). Agonists (A) bind with different affinity to R and to the RG complex; similarly, G differentiates between R and the AR complex. Theoretical binding curves calculated according to the model have been analyzed in terms of the Hill equation and as a mixture of independent and noninteracting sites. The model is shown to be compatible in some respects with reported data on the binding of agonists to the beta-adrenergic receptor but not to the muscarinic cholinergic or D2 dopaminergic receptors. It is difficult to reconcile with the reported effects of guanylyl nucleotides, magnesium, and N-ethylmaleimide on the binding of agonists at any neurohumoral receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2879554     DOI: 10.1021/bi00370a038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  10 in total

Review 1.  Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Paul S-H Park; Slawomir Filipek; James W Wells; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  On the fitting of binding data when receptor dimerization is suspected.

Authors:  J Giraldo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Activation of G protein-coupled receptors: beyond two-state models and tertiary conformational changes.

Authors:  Paul S-H Park; David T Lodowski; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Interaction affinity between cytokine receptor components on the cell surface.

Authors:  A Whitty; N Raskin; D L Olson; C W Borysenko; C M Ambrose; C D Benjamin; L C Burkly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Coupling of g proteins to reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Dar'ya S Redka; Takefumi Morizumi; Gwendolynne Elmslie; Pranavan Paranthaman; Rabindra V Shivnaraine; John Ellis; Oliver P Ernst; James W Wells
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Identifying ligand-specific signalling within biased responses: focus on δ opioid receptor ligands.

Authors:  I Charfi; N Audet; H Bagheri Tudashki; G Pineyro
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Mono- and divalent cations modulate the affinities of brain D1 and D2 receptors for dopamine by a mechanism independent of receptor coupling to guanyl nucleotide binding proteins.

Authors:  S Urwyler
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  The effects of agonists on the components of the cardiac muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  A S Burgen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Membrane phospholipid polar heads influence the coupling of M2 muscarinic receptors to G proteins.

Authors:  J P Gies; C Bertrand; Y Landry
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.996

10.  Two affinity states of M1 muscarine receptors.

Authors:  L T Potter; C A Ferrendelli; H E Hanchett
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.046

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.