Literature DB >> 28795537

Proteomics Investigations into Serum Proteins Adsorbed by High-Flux and Low-Flux Dialysis Membranes.

Shuai Han1, Kaiguang Yang2, Jingdi Sun1, Jianhui Liu2, Lihua Zhang2, Jiuyang Zhao1.   

Abstract

Hemodialysis is one of the most important therapies for patients with uremia, and the dialysis membrane is the predominant factor that impacts the efficiency of dialysis. Here, a protein adsorption on two different membranes is investigated to provide a basis for improving dialysis materials. Two cases treated with the Polyflux 14L low-flux dialyzer and the Polyflux 140H high-flux dialyzers during two continuous therapies are selected. Four used dialyzers from selected patients are infused with C12Im-Cl to elute the adsorbed proteins. Then labeled digested proteins adsorb by Polyflux 140H and Polyflux 14L with 13 CD2 O and NaCNBD3 (light labeling, L) and CD2 O and NaCNBH3 (heavy labeling, H), respectively. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is used to identify the proteins. According to the ratio (Light labeling/Heavy labeling), the eluted proteins are divided into three groups: significantly higher, significantly lower, and no significant differences with a ratio of >2, <0.5, and 0.5-2, respectively. A total of 668 proteins are identified by LC-MS/MS, among which 177 proteins are retained more by the Polyflux 140H membrane (ratio >2), 320 proteins are retained more by the Polyflux 14L membrane (ratio <0.5), and 171 proteins show no significant difference (ratio 0.5-2) between the two types of membranes. Statistical significance is shown in the percentage of adsorbed proteins with an isoelectric point (pI) ranging from 9 to 10 (19.08 versus 7.69%; χ2 = 11.87, p = 0.0006). Proteins with a molecular weight (MW) of 10-15 kDa tend to deposit on Polyflux 140H compared with Polyflux 14L (25 versus 9.23%; χ2 = 18.66, p = 0.0000) and proteins with a MW of 30-60 kDa tend to deposit on Polyflux 14L compared with Polyflux 140H (36.54 versus 22.37%; χ2 = 8.96, p = 0.0028). According to gene ontology analysis, the proteins adsorbed by dialysis membranes are closely related to activation of complement system and the coagulation cascade. The proteins adsorbed by Polyflux 140H and Polyflux 14L show significant differences in PI, MW, and protein class. Proteomic techniques are an effective approach for studying hemodialysis membranes.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorbed proteins; Hemodialysis membrane; Proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28795537     DOI: 10.1002/prca.201700079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl        ISSN: 1862-8346            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Determinants of Hemodialysis Performance: Modeling Fluid and Solute Transport in Hollow-Fiber Dialyzers.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Vipul C Chitalia; Olukemi O Akintewe; Aurelie Edwards; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Protein phosphatase 2A regulates cytotoxicity and drug resistance by dephosphorylating AHR and MDR1.

Authors:  Liping Chen; Ping Guo; Wenxue Li; Xinhang Jiang; Qun Zhao; Daochuan Li; Qing Wang; Yongmei Xiao; Xiumei Xing; Yaqin Pang; Michael Aschner; Lihua Zhang; Wen Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.486

Review 3.  Examining hemodialyzer membrane performance using proteomic technologies.

Authors:  Mario Bonomini; Luisa Pieroni; Lorenzo Di Liberato; Vittorio Sirolli; Andrea Urbani
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Case studies of clinical hemodialysis membranes: influences of membrane morphology and biocompatibility on uremic blood-membrane interactions and inflammatory biomarkers.

Authors:  Heloisa Westphalen; Shaghayegh Saadati; Ubong Eduok; Amira Abdelrasoul; Ahmed Shoker; Phillip Choi; Huu Doan; Farhad Ein-Mozaffari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessment of removal and adsorption enhancement of high-flux hemodialyzers in convective therapies by a novel in vitro uremic matrix.

Authors:  Miquel Gomez; Elisenda Bañon-Maneus; Marta Arias-Guillén; Francisco Maduell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A comparative analysis of high-flux and low-flux dialysis in cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure showing no significantly improved renal function after catheterisation.

Authors:  Chen-Li Zhang; De-Qiong Xie; Li-Na Ao; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Proteomics investigation of the changes in serum proteins after high- and low-flux hemodialysis.

Authors:  Shuai Han; Kaiguang Yang; Hong Zhu; Jianhui Liu; Lihua Zhang; Jiuyang Zhao
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.