Literature DB >> 28795364

Survival Benefit of Additional Surgery After Non-curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Sho Suzuki1, Takuji Gotoda2, Waku Hatta3, Tsuneo Oyama4, Noboru Kawata5, Akiko Takahashi4, Yoshikazu Yoshifuku6, Shu Hoteya7, Masahiro Nakagawa8, Masaaki Hirano9, Mitsuru Esaki1,10, Mitsuru Matsuda11, Ken Ohnita12, Kohei Yamanouchi13, Motoyuki Yoshida14, Osamu Dohi15, Jun Takada16, Keiko Tanaka17, Shinya Yamada18, Tsuyotoshi Tsuji19, Hirotaka Ito20, Yoshiaki Hayashi21, Tooru Shimosegawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Previous studies comparing survival outcomes between patients who did and did not undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) were limited in that the baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups. We aimed to address this limitation and compared survival outcomes between these two groups using propensity score matching analysis.
METHODS: The study enrolled 1969 consecutive patients who underwent non-curative ESD for EGC between 2000 and 2011 at any of 19 institutions across Japan. Using propensity score matching analysis, patients who underwent additional surgery (n = 1064) were compared with patients who did not (n = 905). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) after ESD were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: Propensity score matching analysis yielded 553 matched pairs and well-balanced baseline characteristics between the two groups. The 5-year OS rates were 91.0% in the additional surgery group and 75.5% in the no additional surgery group, and the 5-year DSS rates were 99.0 and 96.8%, respectively. OS and DSS in the additional surgery group were significantly higher than in the no additional surgery group (OS, p < 0.001; DSS, p = 0.013). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, additional surgery significantly reduced gastric cancer-related death after non-curative ESD for EGC (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.79, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that additional surgery reduces mortality after non-curative ESD for EGC. We recommend additional surgery for patients after non-curative ESD for EGC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28795364     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6039-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  18 in total

1.  Propensity score-matched comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for treatment of early gastric cancer in a Western setting.

Authors:  R Bausys; A Bausys; J Stanaitis; I Vysniauskaite; K Maneikis; B Bausys; E Stratilatovas; K Strupas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Survival benefits of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection in patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Debang Li; Haixin Luan; Shijie Wang; Yanming Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lihu Gu; Parikshit A Khadaroo; Liangliang Chen; Xinlong Li; Hepan Zhu; Xin Zhong; Junhai Pan; Manman Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prognosis of patients with early gastric carcinoma treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors for additional postoperative surgery.

Authors:  Shuang Jiang; Dahe Ge; Kaijun Shou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Reduction in the procedure time of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: a multi-center retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Esaki; Sho Suzuki; Toshiki Horii; Ryoji Ichijima; Shun Yamakawa; Hitoshi Shibuya; Chika Kusano; Hisatomo Ikehara; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  [Surgical management for early stage gastric cancer].

Authors:  K Ludwig; D Möller; J Bernhardt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Risk Factors Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis for Early Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Non-curative Endoscopic Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bochao Zhao; Jingting Zhang; Jiale Zhang; Rui Luo; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu; Baojun Huang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Safety of expanded criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer in a Western cohort.

Authors:  Rimantas Bausys; Augustinas Bausys; Kazimieras Maneikis; Viktorija Belogorceva; Eugenijus Stratilatovas; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Propensity score-matching analysis to compare clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the postoperative and non-operative stomachs.

Authors:  Mitsuru Esaki; Sho Suzuki; Yasuyo Hayashi; Azusa Yokoyama; Shuichi Abe; Taizo Hosokawa; Shinichi Tsuruta; Yosuke Minoda; Yoshitaka Hata; Haruei Ogino; Hirotada Akiho; Eikichi Ihara; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2020-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.