Hironori Watanabe1, Hiroaki Kanehisa2, Yasuhide Yoshitake3. 1. Graduate School of Physical Education, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima, 8912393, Japan. 2. Department of Sports and Life Sciences, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima, 8912393, Japan. 3. Department of Sports and Life Sciences, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima, 8912393, Japan. y-yoshi@nifs-k.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to examine (1) the effect of task difficulty on unintended muscle activation (UIMA) levels in contralateral homologous muscle, (2) the difference between young and old adults in degree of UIMA with respect to task difficulty, and (3) temporal correlations between intended and contralateral unintended muscle activity at low frequency during unilateral intended force-matching tasks. METHODS: Twelve young (21.8 ± 2.4 years) and twelve old (69.9 ± 5.3 years) adult men performed steady isometric abductions with the left index finger at 20-80% of maximal voluntary contraction force. Two task difficulties were set by adjusting the spacing between two bars centered about the target force used for visual feedback on a monitor. The amplitude of surface electromyogram (aEMG) for both hands was calculated and normalized with respect to the maximal value. To determine if oscillations between intended and unintended muscle activities were correlated, cross-correlation function (CCF) of rectified EMG for both hands at low frequency was calculated for samples deemed adequate. RESULTS: The unintended aEMG (right hand) had significant main effects in task difficulty, age, and target force (all P < 0.05) without any interactions. Distinct significant peaks in CCF (0.38 on average, P < 0.05) with small time lags were present between rectified EMGs of intended and unintended muscles in 14 of the 17 samples. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that UIMA increases with greater task difficulty regardless of age, and temporal correlations exist between intended and contralateral unintended muscle activities at low frequency.
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to examine (1) the effect of task difficulty on unintended muscle activation (UIMA) levels in contralateral homologous muscle, (2) the difference between young and old adults in degree of UIMA with respect to task difficulty, and (3) temporal correlations between intended and contralateral unintended muscle activity at low frequency during unilateral intended force-matching tasks. METHODS: Twelve young (21.8 ± 2.4 years) and twelve old (69.9 ± 5.3 years) adult men performed steady isometric abductions with the left index finger at 20-80% of maximal voluntary contraction force. Two task difficulties were set by adjusting the spacing between two bars centered about the target force used for visual feedback on a monitor. The amplitude of surface electromyogram (aEMG) for both hands was calculated and normalized with respect to the maximal value. To determine if oscillations between intended and unintended muscle activities were correlated, cross-correlation function (CCF) of rectified EMG for both hands at low frequency was calculated for samples deemed adequate. RESULTS: The unintended aEMG (right hand) had significant main effects in task difficulty, age, and target force (all P < 0.05) without any interactions. Distinct significant peaks in CCF (0.38 on average, P < 0.05) with small time lags were present between rectified EMGs of intended and unintended muscles in 14 of the 17 samples. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that UIMA increases with greater task difficulty regardless of age, and temporal correlations exist between intended and contralateral unintended muscle activities at low frequency.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; Common drive; Contralateral irradiation; Cross-correlation function; Motor overflow
Authors: F Giovannelli; A Borgheresi; F Balestrieri; A Ragazzoni; G Zaccara; M Cincotta; U Ziemann Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Ingo Uttner; Eduard Kraft; Dennis A Nowak; Friedemann Müller; Jens Philipp; Andreas Zierdt; Joachim Hermsdörfer Journal: Motor Control Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: D H Salat; D S Tuch; D N Greve; A J W van der Kouwe; N D Hevelone; A K Zaleta; B R Rosen; B Fischl; S Corkin; H Diana Rosas; A M Dale Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2004-12-19 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Yasmin Baliz; Christine Armatas; Maree Farrow; Kate E Hoy; Paul B Fitzgerald; John L Bradshaw; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jeffrey W Keller; Julia Balzer; Annina Fahr; Jan Lieber; Urs Keller; Hubertus J A van Hedel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 4.379