Airton Mota Moreira1, André Moreira de Assis2, Francisco Cesar Carnevale2, Alberto Azoubel Antunes3, Miguel Srougi3, Giovanni Guido Cerri4. 1. Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery Department, Radiology Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, 255, Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar Av., São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. airton.mota@criep.com.br. 2. Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery Department, Radiology Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, 255, Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar Av., São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. 3. Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, 255, Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar Av., São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. 4. Radiology Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, 255, Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar Av., São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive procedures have gained great importance among the treatments for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) due to their low morbidity. Prostate artery embolization has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for patients with large volume BPH, not suited for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low adverse events rates have been reported following prostate artery embolization and may include dysuria, urinary infection, hematuria, hematospermia, acute urinary retention and rectal bleeding. Although most complaints are reported as side effects, complications can also be superimposed. RESULTS: The prostate gland is the most common source of complaints following PAE, where the inflammatory process can create a large variety of localized symptoms. Periprostatic organs and structures such as bladder, rectum, penis, seminal vesicle, pelvis, bones and skin may be damaged by nontarget embolization, especially due to the misidentification of the normal vascular anatomy and variants or due to inadvertent embolic reflux. Radiodermatitis may also happen in case of small vessel size, atherosclerosis, the learning curve and long procedure or fluoroscopy times. DISCUSSION: Regarding safety, it is pivotal to understand the pathophysiology of adverse events following PAE and their standardized reporting. The aim of this article is to discuss adverse events, their management and to review the current literature.
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive procedures have gained great importance among the treatments for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) due to their low morbidity. Prostate artery embolization has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for patients with large volume BPH, not suited for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low adverse events rates have been reported following prostate artery embolization and may include dysuria, urinary infection, hematuria, hematospermia, acute urinary retention and rectal bleeding. Although most complaints are reported as side effects, complications can also be superimposed. RESULTS: The prostate gland is the most common source of complaints following PAE, where the inflammatory process can create a large variety of localized symptoms. Periprostatic organs and structures such as bladder, rectum, penis, seminal vesicle, pelvis, bones and skin may be damaged by nontarget embolization, especially due to the misidentification of the normal vascular anatomy and variants or due to inadvertent embolic reflux. Radiodermatitis may also happen in case of small vessel size, atherosclerosis, the learning curve and long procedure or fluoroscopy times. DISCUSSION: Regarding safety, it is pivotal to understand the pathophysiology of adverse events following PAE and their standardized reporting. The aim of this article is to discuss adverse events, their management and to review the current literature.
Authors: Ubenicio Silveira Dias; Maurício Ruettimann Liberato de Moura; Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana; André Moreira de Assis; Antônio Sérgio Zanfred Marcelino; Airton Mota Moreira; Claudia Costa Leite; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Francisco Cesar Carnevale; Natally Horvat Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Jacklyn N Hellwege; Sarah Stallings; Eric S Torstenson; Robert Carroll; Kenneth M Borthwick; Murray H Brilliant; David Crosslin; Adam Gordon; George Hripcsak; Gail P Jarvik; James G Linneman; Parimala Devi; Peggy L Peissig; Patrick A M Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson; Marylyn D Ritchie; Shefali Setia Verma; Ning Shang; Josh C Denny; Dan M Roden; Digna R Velez Edwards; Todd L Edwards Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 4.379