| Literature DB >> 28795114 |
Péter Pikó1,2, Szilvia Fiatal2,3, Zsigmond Kósa4, János Sándor2,3, Róza Ádány1,2,3.
Abstract
Data obtained by genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were utilized in Genetic Risk Score [unweighted (GRS) and weighted (wGRS)] computation on Hungarian general and Roma populations. The selection process of the SNPs as well as the results obtained are published in our research article (Piko et al., 2017) [1]. Linkage analyses were performed by study groups. Study populations were stratified by quintiles of weighted Genetic Risk Score. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed using Genetic Risk Scores and HDL-C levels as dependent variables; and ethnicity, sex and age as independent variables. The study subjects were categorized into quintiles according their wGRS values. Associations of Genetic Risk Scores with plasma HDL-C levels (as a continuous variable) were observed in both populations. Finally, the two populations were merged and analyzed together by multivariate logistic regression where reduced plasma HDL-C level was the dependent variable; while ethnicity, age and sex were the independent ones.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic risk score; Genetic susceptibility; High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Roma population; Single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2017 PMID: 28795114 PMCID: PMC5545818 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
List of the SNPs which were involved in the research.
| Nearest Gene | Gene (short) | SNP (rs number) | Chromosome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apolipoprotein B | APOB | rs693 | 2 |
| ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA1 | ABCA1 | rs4149268 | 9 |
| Cholesteryl ester transfer protein | CETP | rs1532624 | 16 |
| Cholesteryl ester transfer protein | CETP | rs5882 | 16 |
| Cholesteryl ester transfer protein | CETP | rs708272 | 16 |
| Cholesteryl ester transfer protein | CETP | rs7499892 | 16 |
| Cholesteryl ester transfer protein | CETP | rs9989419 | 16 |
| Endothelial lipase | LIPG | rs2000813 | 18 |
| Endothelial lipase | LIPG | rs4939883 | 18 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs10468017 | 15 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs1077834 | 15 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs1532085 | 15 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs1800588 | 15 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs2070895 | 15 |
| Hepatic lipase | LIPC | rs4775041 | 15 |
| HMG-CoA Reductase | HMGCR | rs3846662 | 5 |
| Lipoprotein lipase | LPL | rs328 | 8 |
| Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 | GALNT2 | rs2144300 | 1 |
| Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 | GALNT2 | rs4846914 | 1 |
| Potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 10 | KCTD10 | rs2338104 | 12 |
| WW Domain Containing Oxidoreductase | WWOX | rs2548861 | 16 |
Fig. 1Haplotype block organization of SNPs related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level on the LD maps for the Hungarian general (A) and Roma (B) populations. Linkage analyses were performed separately in the study populations. According to the LD map generated by Haploview, there are four haplotype blocks (outlined in a bold black line) consisting of variants that are in high LD. The blocks were formed by the SNPs of the CETP, LIPC and GALNT2 genes. The numbers above the map show the rs numbers of SNPs. The colour scheme is a standard Haploview colour scheme (white D′<1 and LOD<2, shades of pink/red: D′<1 and LOD≥2, and bright red D′=1 and LOD≥2). Numbers in squares are D′ values.
Distribution of study populations by wGRS quintiles.
| 1.83 | 0.51 | 0.025 | |
| 17.18 | 10.45 | <0.001 | |
| 48.38 | 49.14 | 0.756 | |
| 30 | 34.76 | 0.037 | |
| 2.61 | 5.14 | 0.004 |
Output of multiple regression models using unweighted and weighted genetic risk scores as dependent variable and ethnicity, age and sex as independent variables.
| Dependent variable: GRS | R Square=0.009 | ||
| 0.667 | <0.001 | 0.092 | |
| 0.106 | 0.477 | 0.016 | |
| −0.0003 | 0.068 | −0.001 | |
| Dependent variable: wGRS | R Square=0.017 | ||
| 0.029 | <0.001 | 0.125 | |
| −0.001 | 0.774 | −0.006 | |
| −0.0002 | 0.202 | −0.028 | |
Multivariate regression analysis using age, sex as covariates did not change the inference neither for the GRS nor for wGRS.
Proportion of subjects with reduced plasma HDL-C level in the General and Roma populations according to wGRS quintiles.
| Average HDL-C level (mmol/l) | 1.56 | 1.47 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 0.021 |
| Reduced plasma HDL-C (%) | 11.54 | 23.77 | 27.8 | 28.5 | 31.43 | 0.083 |
| Average HDL-C level (mmol/l) | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.2 | 1.09 | 0.076 |
| Reduced plasma HDL-C (%) | 33.33 | 44.26 | 49.83 | 52.22 | 56.67 | 0.054 |
Association of GRSs with plasma HDL-Ca level by study groups.
| −0.01 (−0.018 to −0.003) | 0.004 | −0.013 (−0.023 to −0.003) | 0.011 | |
| −0.011 (−0.018 to −0.004) | 0.003 | −0.013 (−0.023 to −0.003) | 0.009 | |
| −0.243 (−0.466 to −0.020) | 0.033 | −0.318 (−0.633 to −0.002) | 0.049 | |
| −0.205 (−0.420 to 0.101) | 0.062 | −0.336 (−0.651 to −0.21) | 0.036 | |
The association of GRS and wGRS with plasma HDL-C level were evaluated under unadjusted regression models (Model I and III) and under regression models adjusted for age and sex (Model II and IV) separately in Roma and general subjects. In all models the HDL-C was the dependent variable, the GRS/wGRS were the independent variables.
95% CI: 95% confidence interval
HDL-C values were non-normally distributed and were transformed using a two-step approach suggested by Templeton [4].
The association of HDL-C level with genetic risk scores adjusted by ethnicity, sex and age.
| Dependent variable: reduced plasma HDL-C level | R Square=0.046 | |
| 1.07 (1.04–3.31) | <0.001 | |
| 2.70 (2.19–3.31) | <0.001 | |
| 0.99 (0.81–1.20) | 0.942 | |
| 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.393 | |
| Dependent variable: reduced plasma HDL-C level | R Square=0.042 | |
| 3.89 (1.56–9.69) | 0.004 | |
| 2.69 (2.19–3.31) | <0.001 | |
| 1.00 (0.83–1.21) | 0.993 | |
| 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.353 |
OR: odds ratio.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |