| Literature DB >> 28794994 |
Mehdi Jalili1, Mahmoud Nikkhah Shahmirzadi1, Mahdi Kaseb Hazrati2, Hamed Ahmadi2.
Abstract
Liquids coming from different sources like wastewaters, agricultural and industrial activities and leakages of chemical substances often have high concentration of chemical compositions and the osmotic gradient generated around such sources causes a considerable transmission of the Contamination. The steam transmitted by non-polluted soils moves to polluted masses, causing an increase in the volume of pollution zone and movement of pollutants. Therefore, such physical and chemical processes should be taken into account in pollution transmission models. Using Crumb method, laboratory investigations were conducted on non-dispersive and dispersive clayey soil samples obtained from three areas in Zanjan Province of Iran. A simple experimental setup has been used and hereby introduced. The impact of osmotic force from salinities of 0.5, 1, and 1.5% on steam transmission in clayey soil was examined. Results indicate that for all samples between 5 to 15 days, the moisture content increased in the pollutant zone and decreased in the non-pollutant area. Also it was observed that for dispersive clayey soil, movement of steam among layers was observed to be orderly and its amount was higher than that of non-dispersive clayey soil.Entities:
Keywords: Dispersive clay; Osmotic potential; Steam transmission; Unsaturated clayey soil
Year: 2017 PMID: 28794994 PMCID: PMC5537427 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2017.06.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1A view of rings with (a) perforated membrane and (b) layered parts.
Fig. 2Steam transmission process from diluted to concentrated solution (a) schematic view and (b) constructed laboratory model.
Results of moisture content obtained by pressure plate device.
| Percentage of moisture content at pressure of 3 atm for three clayey samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Container weight | Weight of container and mud | Weight of container and dried soil | Percentage of moisture content |
| Dandi I clay | 30.24 | 51.07 | 46.83 | 25.56 |
| Dandi II clay | 32.45 | 51.77 | 47.86 | 25.37 |
| Gavazeng I clay | 42.49 | 85.21 | 81.19 | 10.38 |
| Gavazeng II clay | 41.34 | 75.88 | 72.66 | 10.28 |
| Tarom I clay | 39.81 | 62.89 | 57.31 | 31.86 |
| Tarom II clay | 31.43 | 53.97 | 48.59 | 31.35 |
Amount of moisture content applied to samples.
| No. | Sampling place | Applied moisture content |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dandi clay | θm = 17.8 |
| 2 | Gavazeng clay | θm = 10.8 |
| 3 | Tarom clay | θm = 7.77 |
Results obtained from experiment of non-dispersive (Dandi and Gavazeng) and dispersive (Tarom) clay soils.
| Salinity | Time (day) | Sample no. | Non-saline area | Saline area | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st layer | 2nd layer | 3rd layer | 4th layer | 5th layer | 6th layer | 1st layer | 2nd layer | 3rd layer | |||
| 0.5 | 5 | I | 17.9 | 17.8 | 17.7 | 17.5 | 17.3 | 16.7 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| II | 0.3 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 11.8 | ||
| III | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | ||
| 15 | I | 17.8 | 17.9 | 18.0 | 18.1 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 19.0 | 19.1 | 19.0 | |
| II | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 13.1 | 12.2 | 12.4 | ||
| III | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.4 | ||
| 1 | 5 | I | 17.9 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 18.5 | 18.4 | 18.1 |
| II | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.3 | ||
| III | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 9.2 | 9.6 | 9.7 | ||
| 15 | I | 17.8 | 17.8 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 17.3 | 17.2 | 19.6 | 19.7 | 19.8 | |
| II | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.0 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 13.4 | ||
| III | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 10.2 | 9.7 | 9.7 | ||
| 1.5 | 5 | I | 17.1 | 16.9 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 16.0 | 14.4 | 19.3 | 19.7 | 19.5 |
| II | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 13.0 | 12.7 | 12.6 | ||
| III | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 9.8 | ||
| 15 | I | 17.9 | 17.9 | 17.8 | 17.7 | 17.3 | 17.3 | 19.6 | 20.2 | 20.0 | |
| II | 10.3 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 13.7 | ||
| III | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 9.1 | 9.9 | 9.9 | ||
Fig. 3Distribution of moisture content in laboratory model for Dandi clay soil with salinity level of (a) 0.5, (b) 1, and (c) 1.5%.
Fig. 4Distribution of moisture content in laboratory model for Gavazang clay soil with salinity level of (a) 0.5, (b) 1, and (c) 1.5%.
Fig. 5Distribution of moisture content in laboratory model for Tarom clay soil with salinity level of (a) 0.5, (b) 1, and (c) 1.5%.