Literature DB >> 28794074

The incidence of acute angle closure in Scotland: a prospective surveillance study.

Paul Y Chua1, Alexander C Day2,3, Ken L Lai4, Nikki Hall5, Lai L Tan6, Kamran Khan7, Lik Thai Lim8, Barny Foot9, Paul J Foster2,3, Augusto Azuara-Blanco10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence, and describe the clinical features and short-term clinical outcomes of acute angle closure (AAC).
METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed AAC were identified prospectively over a 12-month period (November 2011 to October 2012) by active surveillance through the Scottish Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit reporting system. Data were collected at case identification and at 6 months follow-up.
RESULTS: There were 114 cases (108 patients) reported, giving an annual incidence of 2.2 cases (95% CI 1.8 to 2.6) or 2 patients (95% CI 1.7 to 2.4) per 1 00 000 in the whole population in Scotland. Precipitating factors were identified in 40% of cases. Almost one in five cases was associated with topical dilating drops. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation ranged from 6/6 to perception of light. The mean presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) was 52 mm Hg (SD 11). Almost 30% cases had a delayed presentation of 3 or more days. At 6 months follow-up, 75% had BCVA of 6/12 or better and 30% were found to have glaucoma at follow-up. Delayed presentation (≥3 days) was associated with higher rate of glaucoma at follow-up (22.6% vs 60.8%, p<0.001), worse VA (0.34 vs 0.74 LogMAR, p<0.0001) and need for more topical medication (0.52 vs 1.2, p=0.003) to control IOP.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of AAC in Scotland is relatively low compared with the Far East countries, but in line with previous European data. Almost one in five cases were associated with pupil dilation for retinal examination. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; glaucoma; public health

Year:  2017        PMID: 28794074     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  Acute Closed-Angle Glaucoma-an Ophthalmological Emergency.

Authors:  Simone Nüssle; Thomas Reinhard; Jan Lübke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 8.251

2.  Potentially inappropriate prescriptions of anticholinergic medications in patients with closed-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo; Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Has the EAGLE landed for the use of clear lens extraction in angle-closure glaucoma? And how should primary angle-closure suspects be treated?

Authors:  Luke Tanner; Gus Gazzard; Winifred P Nolan; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Emergency Department Presentations of Acute Primary Angle Closure in the United States from 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  Sumarth K Mehta; Tahreem Mir; Isaac G Freedman; Amar H Sheth; Soshian Sarrafpour; Ji Liu; Christopher C Teng
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  The effects of acute angle closure crisis on corneal endothelial cells in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Lin Cong; Xiaojing Pan; Yiping Xia; Yangyang Zhang; Jun Cheng; Yanling Dong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  FLASH: A Novel Tool to Identify Vision-Threating Eye Emergencies.

Authors:  Neil Jairath; Patrick Commiskey; Ariane Kaplan; Yannis M Paulus
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2020-10-08

7.  [Acute angle closure : An ophthalmological emergency in the emergency room].

Authors:  S Nuessle; J Luebke; D Boehringer; T Reinhard; A Anton
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 0.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.