Literature DB >> 28794053

Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis: Evolving Role of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Matthew D Saybolt1, Paul N Fiorilli1, Zachary M Gertz1, Howard C Herrmann2.   

Abstract

The definition of severe aortic stenosis has classically and retrospectively been based on the natural history of patients with medically managed aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function in an era where surgical aortic valve replacement was the sole therapy. We now recognize that this disease is more heterogeneous and includes important subsets of patients with low stroke volume index (low flow) and low-gradient with reduced (classical) or preserved (paradoxical) ejection fraction. These patients pose diagnostic and treatment dilemmas, requiring a comprehensive assessment with integration of multimodality imaging, testing, and clinical assessment. Surgery in these patients has been associated with higher operative mortality and lower long-term survival. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), because of its less-invasive nature, avoidance of the detrimental effects of cardiopulmonary bypass, and larger effective orifice area, offers several potential advantages. Studies of TAVR in low-flow severe aortic stenosis patients have demonstrated that TAVR has a significant mortality benefit compared with medical therapy and a similar benefit compared with surgery. Both low flow and low ejection fraction have emerged as important factors in predicting mortality post-TAVR, with particularly poor survival when flow or ejection fraction fail to improve. The recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with low-flow severe aortic stenosis remains challenging. It is likely that TAVR will play an increasingly important role in the management of these patients.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; cardiopulmonary bypass; heart valve prosthesis; stroke volume

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28794053     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  6 in total

1.  Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hatim Seoudy; Nathalie Güßefeld; Johanne Frank; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Georg Lutter; Matthias Eden; Ashraf Yusuf Rangrez; Christian Kuhn; Norbert Frey; Derk Frank
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  New Evidence About Aortic Valve Stenosis and Cardiovascular Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Costantino Mancusi; Edda Bahlmann; Christian Basile; Eva Gerdts
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Outcomes of Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis After Chest Radiation: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Dongfeng Zhang; Wei Guo; Mohammed A Al-Hijji; Abdallah El Sabbagh; Bradley R Lewis; Kevin Greason; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; David R Holmes; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Patient- and Process-Related Contributors to the Underuse of Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Mortality in Ambulatory Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Laura Flannery; Muhammad Etiwy; Alexander Camacho; Ran Liu; Nilay Patel; Arpi Tavil-Shatelyan; Varsha K Tanguturi; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Evin Yucel; Rahul Sakhuja; Arminder S Jassar; Nathaniel B Langer; Ignacio Inglessis; Jonathan J Passeri; Judy Hung; Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.106

5.  Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis - Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry.

Authors:  S L Hungerford; A I Adji; N K Bart; L Lin; N Song; A Jabbour; M F O'Rourke; C S Hayward; D W M Muller
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Hypertens       Date:  2021-05-28

6.  Is there a benefit of ICD treatment in patients with persistent severely reduced systolic left ventricular function after TAVI?

Authors:  Richard J Nies; Christian Frerker; Matti Adam; Elmar Kuhn; Victor Mauri; Felix S Nettersheim; Simon Braumann; Thorsten Wahlers; Stephan Baldus; Tobias Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.