| Literature DB >> 28793659 |
A Arnautov1, A Nasibullins2, V Gribniak3,4, I Blumbergs5, M Hauka6.
Abstract
The effect of through-thickness reinforcement by thin 1 mm steel needles (z-pins) on the static tensile strength of double-lap joints of a carbon/epoxy composite was investigated. Two types of joints-z-pinned and hybrid (including glued ones)-were considered. The joints were reinforced in the overlap region with 9, 25, or 36 z-pins. Comparing mechanical properties of the double-lap joints with the corresponding characteristics of their unpinned counterparts, the z-pins were found to be highly effective: the strength and stiffness of the pinned joints increased up to 300% and 280%, respectively. These improvements were due to a transition in the failure mechanism from debonding of the joint in the absence of z-pins to pullout or shear rupture of z-pins or to the tensile failure of laminate adherends, depending on the volume content of the pins.Entities:
Keywords: carbon/epoxy composite; hybrid; joints; mechanical properties; z-pins
Year: 2015 PMID: 28793659 PMCID: PMC5458913 DOI: 10.3390/ma8115410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Tensile properties of carbon fiber epoxy laminate plates (of thickness 3.5 mm).
| Young’s Modulus, E11, GPa | Poisson’s Ratio | Poisson’s Ratio | Ultimate Tensile Strength σ11, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76.7 ± 0.8 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.042 ± 0.003 | 520 ± 26 |
Mechanical properties of steel needles.
| Tensile Modulus of Elasticity, GPa | Tensile Yield Point, MPa | Ultimate Elongation, % | Poisson’s Ratio | Shear Modulus, GPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 420 | 18 | 0.31 | 80.0 |
Figure 1Geometry of the samples and distribution schemes of the pins (all units in mm).
Mechanical properties of Sikadur® 52 adhesive [22].
| Tensile Modulus, GPa | Tensile Strength, MPa | Ultimate Strain, % | Poisson’s Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.93 | 42.0 | 3 | 0.31 |
Figure 2Side-view on drilled holes in the overlap region.
Figure 3Double-lap adhesive joint (1) and hybrid joints with 9 (2), 25 (3) and 36 (4) pins, and the needles (5).
Figure 4The tensile test setup.
Figure 5Shear stress-displacement diagrams of the double-lap needled joints reinforced with different numbers of the z-pins.
Figure 6Shear stress-displacement diagrams determined for the adhesive double-lap joints with different numbers of the z-pins (arrows indicate the drop in the shear stress).
Effect of the number of z-pins on the mechanical properties of double-lap joints.
| Joint Type | Number of z-Pins | Ultimate Shear Strength | Elongation at the Ultimate Load, mm | Shear Stiffness, kN/m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesive (reference) | 0 | 14.2 ± 2.5 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
| Needled bond | 9 | 13.9 ± 3.2 | 1.42 ± 0.25 | 6.3 ± 0.7 |
| Needled bond | 25 | 36.5 ± 5.1 | 2.31 ± 0.28 | 11.3 ± 0.9 |
| Needled bond | 36 | 55.9 ± 6.2 | 2.03 ± 0.29 | 12.3 ± 0.7 |
| Hybrid bond | 9 | 21.2 ± 2.4 | 0.67 ± 0.19 | 10.8 ± 0.6 |
| Hybrid bond | 25 | 46.0 ± 2.9 | 1.34 ± 0.31 | 18.2 ± 0.8 |
| Hybrid bond | 36 | 53.7 ± 3.3 | 1.56 ± 0.31 | 21.6 ± 1.2 |
Figure 7The z-pins effect on the ultimate shear stress of pinned-only (a) and hybrid (b) double-lap joints (DLJ).
Figure 8The z-pins effect on the shear stiffness of pinned-only (a) and hybrid (b) DLJ.
Figure 9Failed hybrid joints: DLJ with 36 z-pins (a) and DLJ with 9 z-pins (b).
Figure 10Different behavior of the pins within the failed hybrid DLJ: transverse shear failure (1) and bearing failure (2).