| Literature DB >> 28793579 |
Jegathish Kanadasan1, Auni Filzah Ahmad Fauzi2, Hashim Abdul Razak3, Paramananthan Selliah4, Vijaya Subramaniam5, Sumiani Yusoff6.
Abstract
The agricultural industry in Malaysia has grown rapidly over the years. Palm oil clinker (POC) is a byproduct obtained from the palm oil industry. Its lightweight properties allows for its utilization as an aggregate, while in powder form as a filler material in concrete. POC specimens obtained throughout each state in Malaysia were investigated to evaluate the physical, chemical, and microstructure characteristics. Variations between each state were determined and their possible contributory factors were assessed. POC were incorporated as a replacement material for aggregates and their engineering characteristics were ascertained. Almost 7% of density was reduced with the introduction of POC as aggregates. A sustainability assessment was made through greenhouse gas emission (GHG) and cost factor analyses to determine the contribution of the addition of POC to the construction industry. Addition of POC helps to lower the GHG emission by 9.6% compared to control specimens. By channeling this waste into the construction industry, an efficient waste-management system can be promoted; thus, creating a cleaner environment. This study is also expected to offer some guides and directions for upcoming research works on the incorporation of POC.Entities:
Keywords: feasibility; microstructure; palm oil clinker; self-compacting mortar; sustainability
Year: 2015 PMID: 28793579 PMCID: PMC5512926 DOI: 10.3390/ma8095319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Review on important findings of using waste materials in the construction industry.
| Reference | Type of Waste | Content | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinto, Vieira, Pereira, Jacinto, Vilela, Paiva, Pereira, Cunha and Varum [ | Agricultural waste | Granulated corn cob | Suitable for non-structural purposes |
| Sales and Lima [ | Agricultural waste | Sugarcane bagasse ash | Strength values greater than the control specimens |
| Chatveera and Lertwattanaruk [ | Agricultural waste | Black rice husk ash (BRHA) | Leaching of concrete reduced for HCl and H2SO4 attack |
| Kanning, Portella, Bragança, Bonato and dos Santos [ | Agricultural waste | Banana leaf ash | Concrete with a strength of 48 ± 2 MPa at 28 days |
| Kanadasan and Abdul Razak [ | Agricultural waste | Palm oil clinker (POC) | Reduces the carbon emission by almost 23% |
| Senthamarai,Manoharan and Gobinath [ | Industrial waste | Ceramic electrical insulator waste | Similar permeation characteristics to that of normal concrete |
| Ramos, Matos, Schmidt, Rio and Sousa-Coutinho [ | Industrial waste | Superfine powder from granitic quarry sludge waste | Elevate the performance of chloride resistance by 70% compared to the control mix |
| Kalla, Rana, Chad, Misra and Csetenyi [ | Industrial waste | Wollastonite | Enhanced the strength and durability properties of concrete |
| Chen, Wang and Tang [ | Industrial waste | Municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and reaction ash with reservoir sediment | Lightweight concrete with a strength of 40 MPa with 63 MPa mortar strength |
Chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement (CEM I) 52.5N.
| Oxides | CEM I 52.5N |
|---|---|
| Al2O3 | 5.37 |
| CaO | 64.00 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.94 |
| K2O | 0.17 |
| MgO | 3.13 |
| Mn2O3 | 0.24 |
| Na2O | 0.12 |
| SiO2 | 20.29 |
| SO3 | 2.61 |
| P2O5 | 0.07 |
| TiO2 | 0.12 |
| Others | 0.94 |
| Loss on ignition | 1.40 |
| C2S | 13.95 |
| C3A | 9.26 |
| C3S | 58.62 |
| C4AF | 8.95 |
Mix proportion.
| State | Abbreviation | Cement (kg) | Water (kg) | POC Fine (kg) | Water/Cement Ratio | Superplastisizer Dosage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kedah | KDH | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.509 | 0.28 | 0.4–0.6 |
| Kelantan | KLT | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.036 | ||
| Terengganu | TRG | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.329 | ||
| Penang | PNG | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.396 | ||
| Perak | PRK | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.374 | ||
| Pahang | PHG | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.576 | ||
| Negeri Sembilan | NSE | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.621 | ||
| Selangor | SEL | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.374 | ||
| Melaka | MLK | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.565 | ||
| Johor | JHR | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.486 | ||
| Sabah | SBH | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.340 | ||
| Sarawak | SWK | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.430 | ||
| Selangor | NML * | 2.28 | 0.64 | 2.925 (Sand) |
* NML—River sand obtained from a source in state of Selangor.
Figure 1A large chunk of palm oil clinker (POC).
Figure 2POC Fine and POC Coarse.
Figure 3Location of palm oil mills selected for POC sampling in Malaysia (Map from www.Mapsof.net).
Figure 4Particle size distribution for sand and POC fine.
Figure 5Particle size distribution for ordinary Portland cement (CEM I) 52.5N.
Physical characteristics of the aggregate.
| State | Abbreviation | Specific Gravity | Water Absorption (%) | Moisture Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kedah | KDH | 2.23 | 1.93 | 0.17 |
| Kelantan | KLT | 1.81 | 4.12 | 0.25 |
| Terengganu | TRG | 2.07 | 2.28 | 0.04 |
| Penang | PNG | 2.13 | 3.05 | 0.07 |
| Perak | PRK | 2.11 | 1.40 | 0.04 |
| Pahang | PHG | 2.29 | 2.34 | 0.03 |
| Negeri Sembilan | NSE | 2.33 | 4.05 | 0.31 |
| Selangor | SEL | 2.11 | 4.10 | 0.48 |
| Melaka | MLK | 2.28 | 1.65 | 0.02 |
| Johor | JHR | 2.21 | 2.37 | 0.17 |
| Sabah | SBH | 2.08 | 2.54 | 0.05 |
| Sarawak | SWK | 2.16 | 5.67 | 0.04 |
| Selangor | NML * | 2.60 | 1.59 | 0.07 |
* NML—River sand obtained from a source in state of Selangor.
Chemical composition of the POC samples from different states.
| State | SiO2 | K2O | CaO | SO3 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | MgO | P2O5 | TiO2 | Na2O | Loss on Ignition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDH | 65.10 | 9.23 | 3.89 | 0.16 | 6.34 | 3.28 | 2.34 | 3.06 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.91 |
| KLT | 73.31 | 8.78 | 4.01 | 0.13 | 6.13 | 6.00 | 2.83 | 1.43 | 0.28 | 0.09 | −0.59 |
| TRG | 72.64 | 9.65 | 4.42 | 0.17 | 3.89 | 5.18 | 2.56 | 3.96 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.16 |
| PNG | 69.91 | 9.24 | 8.56 | 0.14 | 5.15 | 4.15 | 3.92 | 3.24 | 0.15 | 0.12 | −0.12 |
| PRK | 74.29 | 6.22 | 5.10 | 0.15 | 2.09 | 3.11 | 1.72 | 2.79 | 0.15 | <0.1 | 0.49 |
| PHG | 60.79 | 5.17 | 10.88 | 0.18 | 15.64 | 7.27 | 2.23 | 1.61 | 0.27 | 0.13 | −0.89 |
| NSE | 65.64 | 7.26 | 4.11 | 0.25 | 14.41 | 7.56 | 2.64 | 1.73 | 0.29 | 0.08 | −0.26 |
| SEL | 64.84 | 12.82 | 5.96 | 0.16 | 4.19 | 3.42 | 5.01 | 3.37 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 1.54 |
| MLK | 57.41 | 11.32 | 6.95 | 0.22 | 10.11 | 4.95 | 4.01 | 4.90 | 0.17 | 0.12 | <0.1 |
| JHR | 69.05 | 11.09 | 5.70 | 0.19 | 3.71 | 4.73 | 2.27 | 3.22 | 0.23 | <0.1 | 0.78 |
| SBH | 62.45 | 13.48 | 9.51 | 0.21 | 2.20 | 1.42 | 6.09 | 7.33 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.35 |
| SWK | 62.52 | 8.44 | 16.74 | 0.23 | 1.10 | 0.82 | 3.43 | 4.75 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.28 |
| Mean | 66.50 | 9.39 | 7.15 | 0.18 | 6.25 | 4.32 | 3.25 | 3.45 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Standard Deviation | 5.13 | 2.40 | 3.63 | 0.04 | 4.54 | 1.99 | 1.24 | 1.59 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.64 |
Types of soil at various sampling points.
| State | Soil Classification |
|---|---|
| KDH | Clayey-Skeletal (>35% gravel within 50 cm depth, >35% Clay) |
| KLT | Fine silty (35%–60% Clay, >30% silt) |
| TRG | Fine clayey (35%–60% Clay, <30% silt). Moderately deep (50–100 cm) soil |
| PNG | Clayey (>35% Clay) |
| PRK | Very fine (>60% Clay) |
| PHG | Fine clayey (35%–60% Clay; <30% silt) |
| NSE | Fine silty (35%–60% Clay, >30% silt) |
| SEL | Fine clayey (35%–60% Clay, <30% silt) |
| MLK | Fine clayey (35%–60% Clay; <30% silt) |
| JHR | Fine loamy (18%–35% Clay) |
| SBH | Fine sandy clay (35%–60% Clay; <30% silt) |
| SWK | Fine loamy (18%–35% Clay) |
Figure 6Aggregate crushing values for various states.
Figure 7X-Ray diffraction results for all states.
Figure 8POC aggregate micrograph at a larger magnification.
Figure 9Presence of micro-pores within internal POC aggregate structure.
Figure 10Slump flow test results.
Figure 11V-Funnel flow time results.
Figure 12Variation in density for the samples of each state.
Figure 13Compressive strength for all states.
Figure 14Structural efficiency for all states.
Figure 15Flexural strength results for all states.
Figure 16Aggregate cement paste interface.
Figure 17POC aggregate—Cement paste interface with X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
Figure 18Cost of mortar incorporating POC aggregate (Kanadasan and Abdul Razak [32]).
Figure 19Relationship between carbon emission, mix type and engineering environmental index (Mineral Products Association [47], Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) [48]).