| Literature DB >> 28793453 |
Tetsuo Umegaki1, Qiang Xu2, Yoshiyuki Kojima3.
Abstract
Hydrogen storage is still one of the most significant issues hindering the development of a "hydrogen energy economy". Ammonia borane is notable for its high hydrogen densities. For the material, one of the main challenges is to release efficiently the maximum amount of the stored hydrogen. Hydrolysis reaction is a promising process by which hydrogen can be easily generated from this compound. High purity hydrogen from this compound can be evolved in the presence of solid acid or metal based catalyst. The reaction performance depends on the morphology and/or structure of these materials. In this review, we survey the research on nanostructured materials, especially porous materials for hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of ammonia borane.Entities:
Keywords: hydrolysis of ammonia borane; immobilization; nanostructured materials; porous materials; support
Year: 2015 PMID: 28793453 PMCID: PMC5455654 DOI: 10.3390/ma8074512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1TEM micrograph of MCM-41 (a); FSM-16 (b); and SBA-15 (c). Reproduced with permission of Ref. [55].
Figure 2The framework structure of ZK-4 zeolite with α- and β-cage [66].
Figure 3(a,b) HAADF-STEM; (c) TEM images; and (d) reconstructed slice by tomography of 2 wt. % Pt@MIL-101. Reproduced with permission of Ref. [46]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Particle size of active species and turnover frequency (TOF) of various catalysts.
| Catalysts | Active Species | Particle Size (nm) | TOF (mol-H2 min−1 mol-Active Species−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co–B/SBA-15 | Co–B | 6–12 | 3.4 | [ |
| Co–B/MCM-41 | - | 3–30 | 2 | - |
| Co–B/FSM-16 | - | 3–30 | 2.1 | - |
| Co–B/non-porous | - | 30 | 0.9 | - |
| unsupported Co–B | - | 30–40 | 0.6 | - |
| Co–B/C-film | - | 50–300 | 0.6 | [ |
| unsupported Co–B film | - | ~250 | 0.1 | - |
| Co–W–P–B/Ni foam | - | 200–400 | - | [ |
| Ru@ZK-4 | Ru | 2.9 | 90 | [ |
| Ni@3D-(N)GFs | Ni | 2–4 | 41.7 | [ |
| p(HEMA)-Co | Co | - | 3.8 | [ |
| p(HEMA)-Ni | Ni | - | 0.8 | - |
| p(HEMA)-Cu | Cu | - | 1.1 | - |
| p(SPM)-Co | Co | - | 5.8 | [ |
| p(SPM)-Ni | Ni | - | 3.8 | - |
| p(SPM)-Cu | Cu | - | 1.8 | - |
| p(VPA)-Co | Co | - | 7.7 | [ |
| p(VPA)-Ni | Ni | - | 3.6 | - |
| p(VPA)-Cu | Cu | - | 1.1 | - |
| Co-MOF | Co | <10 | 20.8 | [ |
| Ni-ZIF-8 | Ni | 2.7 | 14.2 | [ |
| Pt@MIL-101(Cr) | Pt | 1.2–3 | 446.4 | [ |
| AuNi@MIL-101(Cr) | AuNi | 2.9–3.4 | 66.2 | [ |
| AuCo@MIL101(Cr) | AuCo | 1.8 | 23.5 | [ |
Figure 4Difference in morphology of hollow silica-alumina composite spheres prepared using ammonia and L(+)-arginine [119].
TOF of various catalysts.
| Catalysts | Active Species | TOF (mol-H2 min−1 mol-Active Species−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hollow Ni–Pt spheres | Ni-Pt bimetal | 19.2 | [ |
| Hollow SiO2–Ni spheres | Ni | 3.8 | [ |
| Hollow SiO2–Al2O3 spheres | SiO2–Al2O3 | 0.01 | [ |
| Co nanowire | Co | 0.9 | [ |