Lee Joseph1, Paul S Chan2,3, Steven M Bradley4, Yunshu Zhou5, Garth Graham2,3, Philip G Jones2,3, Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin5,6, Saket Girotra1. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City. 2. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City. 4. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 5. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City.
Abstract
Importance: Previous studies have found marked differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest by race. Whether racial differences in survival have narrowed as overall survival has improved remains unknown. Objectives: To examine whether racial differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest have narrowed over time and if such differences could be explained by acute resuscitation survival, postresuscitation survival, and/or greater temporal improvement in survival at hospitals with higher proportions of black patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study from Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation, performed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2014, a total of 112 139 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest who were hospitalized in intensive care units or general inpatient units were studied. Data analysis was performed from April 7, 2015, to May 24, 2017. Exposure: Race (black or white). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes were acute resuscitation survival and postresuscitation survival. Multivariable hierarchical (2-level) regression models were used to calculate calendar-year rates of survival for black and white patients after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: Among 112 139 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, 30 241 (27.0%) were black (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [16.4] years) and 81 898 (73.0%) were white (mean [SD] age, 67.5 [15.2] years). Risk-adjusted survival improved over time in black (11.3% in 2000 and 21.4% in 2014) and white patients (15.8% in 2000 and 23.2% in 2014; P for trend <.001 for both), with greater survival improvement among black patients on an absolute (P for trend = .02) and relative scale (P for interaction = .01). A reduction in survival differences between black and white patients was attributable to elimination of racial differences in acute resuscitation survival (black individuals: 44.7% in 2000 and 64.1% in 2014; white individuals: 47.1% in 2000 and 64.0% in 2014; P for interaction <.001). Compared with hospitals with fewer black patients, hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest achieved larger survival gains over time. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial reduction in racial differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has occurred that has been largely mediated by elimination of racial differences in acute resuscitation survival and greater survival improvement at hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients. Further understanding of the mechanisms of this improvement could provide novel insights for the elimination of racial differences in survival for other conditions.
Importance: Previous studies have found marked differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest by race. Whether racial differences in survival have narrowed as overall survival has improved remains unknown. Objectives: To examine whether racial differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest have narrowed over time and if such differences could be explained by acute resuscitation survival, postresuscitation survival, and/or greater temporal improvement in survival at hospitals with higher proportions of black patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study from Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation, performed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2014, a total of 112 139 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest who were hospitalized in intensive care units or general inpatient units were studied. Data analysis was performed from April 7, 2015, to May 24, 2017. Exposure: Race (black or white). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes were acute resuscitation survival and postresuscitation survival. Multivariable hierarchical (2-level) regression models were used to calculate calendar-year rates of survival for black and white patients after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: Among 112 139 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, 30 241 (27.0%) were black (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [16.4] years) and 81 898 (73.0%) were white (mean [SD] age, 67.5 [15.2] years). Risk-adjusted survival improved over time in black (11.3% in 2000 and 21.4% in 2014) and white patients (15.8% in 2000 and 23.2% in 2014; P for trend <.001 for both), with greater survival improvement among black patients on an absolute (P for trend = .02) and relative scale (P for interaction = .01). A reduction in survival differences between black and white patients was attributable to elimination of racial differences in acute resuscitation survival (black individuals: 44.7% in 2000 and 64.1% in 2014; white individuals: 47.1% in 2000 and 64.0% in 2014; P for interaction <.001). Compared with hospitals with fewer black patients, hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest achieved larger survival gains over time. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial reduction in racial differences in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has occurred that has been largely mediated by elimination of racial differences in acute resuscitation survival and greater survival improvement at hospitals with a higher proportion of black patients. Further understanding of the mechanisms of this improvement could provide novel insights for the elimination of racial differences in survival for other conditions.
Authors: Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sana M Al-Khatib; Anne S Hellkamp; Adrian F Hernandez; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin L Thomas; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Paul A Heidenreich; Stephen Hammill; Clyde Yancy; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter A Meaney; Bentley J Bobrow; Mary E Mancini; Jim Christenson; Allan R de Caen; Farhan Bhanji; Benjamin S Abella; Monica E Kleinman; Dana P Edelson; Robert A Berg; Tom P Aufderheide; Venu Menon; Marion Leary Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mauricio G Cohen; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric D Peterson; Mauro Moscucci; David Dai; Adrian F Hernandez; Robert O Bonow; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William M P Klein; Colleen M McBride; Caitlin G Allen; Elva M Arredondo; Cinnamon S Bloss; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Amy C Sturm; Catharine Wang Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Di Zhao; Wendy S Post; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Alan Cheng; Yiyi Zhang; Rajat Deo; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Erin D Michos; Nona Sotoodehnia; Eliseo Guallar Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lars W Andersen; Mathias J Holmberg; Katherine M Berg; Michael W Donnino; Asger Granfeldt Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mahmoud S Issa; Anne V Grossestreuer; Het Patel; Lethu Ntshinga; Amin Coker; Tuyen Yankama; Michael W Donnino; Katherine M Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Sarah E Haskell; Saket Girotra; Yunshu Zhou; M Bridget Zimmerman; Marina Del Rios; Raina M Merchant; Dianne L Atkins Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Joseph E Tonna; Craig H Selzman; Saket Girotra; Angela P Presson; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Lance B Becker; Chong Zhang; Heather T Keenan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Anna V Subramaniam; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; P Elliott Miller; Gregory W Barsness; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 5.501