Kristof Smeets1, Johan Bellemans2, Lennart Scheys3, Bert O Eijnde4, Joshua Slane3, Steven Claes5. 1. Doctoral School for Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-, Limburg, Genk, Belgium. Electronic address: kristofsmeets@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-, Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. 3. Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training, Division of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven/Department of Development and Regenartion, Faculty of Medicine, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AZ Herentals Hospital, Herentals, Belgium; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide information about the mechanical properties of grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions and to compare those results with the mechanical properties of native knee ligaments. METHODS: Eleven cadaveric knees were dissected for the semitendinosus, gracilis, iliotibial band (ITB), quadriceps and patellar tendon. Uniaxial testing to failure was performed using a standardized method and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, strain energy density) were determined. RESULTS: The elastic modulus of the gracilis tendon (1458±476MPa) (P<0.001) and the semitendinosus tendon (1036±312MPa) (P<0.05) was significantly higher than the ITB (610±171MPa), quadriceps tendon (568±194MPa), and patellar tendon (417±107MPa). In addition, the ultimate stress of the hamstring tendons (gracilis 155.0±30.7MPa and semitendinosus 120.1±30.0MPa) was significantly higher (P<0.001, respectively P<0.05), relative to the ITB (75.0±11.8MPa), quadriceps tendon (81.0±27.6MPa), and patellar tendon (76.2±25.1MPa). A significant difference (P<0.05) could be noticed between the ultimate strain of the patellar tendon (24.6±5.9%) and the hamstrings (gracilis 14.5±3.1% and semitendinosus 17.0±4.0%). No significant difference in strain energy density between the grafts was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Material properties of common grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions often differ significantly from the original knee ligament which the graft is supposed to emulate.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide information about the mechanical properties of grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions and to compare those results with the mechanical properties of native knee ligaments. METHODS: Eleven cadaveric knees were dissected for the semitendinosus, gracilis, iliotibial band (ITB), quadriceps and patellar tendon. Uniaxial testing to failure was performed using a standardized method and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, strain energy density) were determined. RESULTS: The elastic modulus of the gracilis tendon (1458±476MPa) (P<0.001) and the semitendinosus tendon (1036±312MPa) (P<0.05) was significantly higher than the ITB (610±171MPa), quadriceps tendon (568±194MPa), and patellar tendon (417±107MPa). In addition, the ultimate stress of the hamstring tendons (gracilis 155.0±30.7MPa and semitendinosus 120.1±30.0MPa) was significantly higher (P<0.001, respectively P<0.05), relative to the ITB (75.0±11.8MPa), quadriceps tendon (81.0±27.6MPa), and patellar tendon (76.2±25.1MPa). A significant difference (P<0.05) could be noticed between the ultimate strain of the patellar tendon (24.6±5.9%) and the hamstrings (gracilis 14.5±3.1% and semitendinosus 17.0±4.0%). No significant difference in strain energy density between the grafts was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Material properties of common grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions often differ significantly from the original knee ligament which the graft is supposed to emulate.
Authors: Elaine C Schmidt; Matthew Chin; Julien T Aoyama; Theodore J Ganley; Kevin G Shea; Michael W Hast Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-01-23