Literature DB >> 28789452

Differential expression profile analysis of DNA damage repair genes in CD133+/CD133- colorectal cancer cells.

Yuhong Lu1, Xin Zhou2, Qingliang Zeng2, Daishun Liu3, Changwu Yue3.   

Abstract

The present study examined differential expression levels of DNA damage repair genes in COLO 205 colorectal cancer cells, with the aim of identifying novel biomarkers for the molecular diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. COLO 205-derived cell spheres were cultured in serum-free medium supplemented with cell factors, and CD133+/CD133- cells were subsequently sorted using an indirect CD133 microbead kit. In vitro differentiation and tumorigenicity assays in BABA/c nude mice were performed to determine whether the CD133+ cells also possessed stem cell characteristics, in addition to the COLO 205 and CD133- cells. RNA sequencing was employed for the analysis of differential gene expression levels at the mRNA level, which was determined using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The mRNA expression levels of 43 genes varied in all three types of colon cancer cells (false discovery rate ≤0.05; fold change ≥2). Of these 43 genes, 30 were differentially expressed (8 upregulated and 22 downregulated) in the COLO 205 cells, as compared with the CD133- cells, and 6 genes (all downregulated) were differentially expressed in the COLO 205 cells, as compared with CD133+ cells. A total of 18 genes (10 upregulated and 8 downregulated) were differentially expressed in the CD133- cells, as compared with the CD133+ cells. By contrast, 6 genes were downregulated and none were upregulated in the CD133+ cells compared with the COLO 205 cells. These findings suggest that CD133+ cells may possess the same DNA repair capacity as COLO 205 cells. Heterogeneity in the expression profile of DNA damage repair genes was observed in COLO 205 cells, and COLO 205-derived CD133- cells and CD133+ cells may therefore provide a reference for molecular diagnosis, therapeutic target selection and determination of the treatment and prognosis for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage repair; colorectal cancer; expression profile analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28789452      PMCID: PMC5530084          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  61 in total

Review 1.  Okazaki fragment maturation: nucleases take centre stage.

Authors:  Li Zheng; Binghui Shen
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.216

2.  Culture of endothelial cells isolated from maternal blood using anti-CD105 and CD133.

Authors:  Hélène A Elicha Gussin; Arun K Sharma; Sherman Elias
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  The role of DNA exonucleases in protecting genome stability and their impact on ageing.

Authors:  Penelope A Mason; Lynne S Cox
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-09-23

Review 4.  The Ku heterodimer: function in DNA repair and beyond.

Authors:  Victoria L Fell; Caroline Schild-Poulter
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 5.  DNA repair by reversal of DNA damage.

Authors:  Chengqi Yi; Chuan He
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 6.  Base excision repair.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Magnar Bjørås
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Structure of a Novel DNA-binding Domain of Helicase-like Transcription Factor (HLTF) and Its Functional Implication in DNA Damage Tolerance.

Authors:  Asami Hishiki; Kodai Hara; Yuzu Ikegaya; Hideshi Yokoyama; Toshiyuki Shimizu; Mamoru Sato; Hiroshi Hashimoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structure of human MTH1, a Nudix family hydrolase that selectively degrades oxidized purine nucleoside triphosphates.

Authors:  Masaki Mishima; Yasunari Sakai; Noriyuki Itoh; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Masato Furuichi; Masayuki Takahashi; Yuriko Yamagata; Shigenori Iwai; Yusaku Nakabeppu; Masahiro Shirakawa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment.

Authors:  Laura Annovazzi; Valentina Caldera; Marta Mellai; Chiara Riganti; Luigi Battaglia; Daniela Chirio; Antonio Melcarne; Davide Schiffer
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.