Literature DB >> 28789376

Effects of TPX2 gene on radiotherapy sensitization in breast cancer stem cells.

Chaoyou Huang1, Zheng Han1, Dehua Wu2.   

Abstract

The present study explored the link between the targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) gene and breast tumor stem cells in order to screen novel radiosensitizers. Expression of TPX2 protein and gene in breast cancer cells was analyzed by western blot analysis and RT-PCR. Three kinds of broad-spectrum sensitizers were selected and their effects on radiotherapy were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in breast tumor stem cells. TPX2 gene and protein were expressed in breast tumor cells and increased gradually along with the expression of cancer cell differentiation; 25 mg/l lovastatin showed best radio-sensitizing effects on breast cancer cells. Furthermore, immunohistochemical results showed that the positive rate of breast cancer cells processed by 25 mg/l lovastatin were significantly decreased. In conclusion, TPX2 gene is closely related to the development of breast cancer stem cells. Moreover, the sensitizing effects of lovastatin on breast tumor stem cells are the result of its influence on the TPX2 gene.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer stem cells; lovastatin; radiosensitizer; targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 gene

Year:  2017        PMID: 28789376      PMCID: PMC5529734          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of females with high incidence and high mortality (1,2). It was traditionally believed that tumor was originated from cell mutation and could grow unlimitedly. However, theories on tumor stem cells have extended knowledge on tumor cells, indicating that tumor develops from tumor stem cells in tissues (3,4). The above recent theory, not only explained biological behavior of breast cancer cells, but also provided new research directions for tumor treatment. Radiotherapy involves X- or gamma-ray treatment onto tumor region and is one of the main methods of treating tumor. The rays interact with molecules (mainly water molecules) in tumor cells to produce cytotoxic OH-free radical resulting in cell death or apoptosis (5). However, during conventional radiotherapy, resistance of cancer cells towards rays is commonly observed (6,7). Therefore, seeking strategies to improve breast cancer radiosensitivity is a recent hot spot in radiotherapy research against tumor. Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) gene, also called XKIP2-targeted protein, is necessary for the microtubule structuring process of cell kinetochore (8–10). Abundant research in recent years has shown that TPX2 gene is closely related with the development of cancer cells such as lung, colon and cervical cancer cells (11). However, there are few studies on the association between TPX2 gene and breast cancer cells. To the best of our knowledge, the present study examined for the first time TPX2 expression in breast tumor stem cells and investigated the association between TPX2 gene and breast tumor stem cells. The present study also involved exploration of radiotherapy with various sensitizers on breast stem cells by targeting the TPX2 gene.

Materials and methods

Experimental materials

Bcap37, MCF7, SKBR3 and MDAMB231 breast cancer cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cell bank (Manassas, VA, USA). Tissue samples were collected from 55 cases of breast cancer cells removed during surgeries from March 2014 to June 2016 in the Hexian Memorial Hospital of Panyu (Guangzhou, China). The samples were confirmed by biopsy. According to clinical staging by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). There were 12, 13, 9 and 21 cases of I–IV stages, respectively. The patients were aged 29–55 years with an average of 38.4±3.9 years. Normal breast cells were collected for comparison. Compounds with spectral sensitization such as docetaxel, lovastatin and β-santalene were obtained.

Extraction of cell total proteins

Specific experimental methods were previously described (12). Extracted proteins were saved at −80°C.

Western blot analysis

Specific experimental methods were carried out as previously described (13).

Extraction of total RNA, detection and determination of purity

Experimental methods were conducted as in the literature (14), with some modifications. Extracted proteins were saved at −80°C.

Radiotherapy experiments on the sensitizing compounds

Docetaxel, lovastatin and β-santalene of the same concentration (20 mg/l) were prepared to function in Bcap37 breast cancer cells. Sensitizing compounds of the same concentration (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 mg/l) were prepared to investigate effects of concentration on breast cancer cells (15).

Grouped processing of sensitization

Two microliters of culture and buffer solutions were added to group A for comparison. Different sensitizers at a rate of 20 mg/l were added to group B. In group C no sensitizer was given and underwent radiotherapy only. After the experiment, the cell apoptotic rate was recorded by flow cytometry (16).

Radiotherapy and flow cytometry

Specific experimental process was carried out as published (15).

Immunohistochemistry experiment

For detection of TPX2 expression in breast tissues, we performed inmmunohistochemical staining according to a previous study (17).

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were analyzed by SPSS software (Chicago, IL, USA). Differences among groups underwent homogeneity test for variance and t-test; testing level was α=0.05. (P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference).

Results

Detection of TPX2 protein expression in different breast cancer cells by western blot analysis

TPX2 protein expression in four types of breast cancer cells, Bcap37, MCF7, SKBR3 and MDAMB231 were detected by western blot analysis. Normal breast cells were used for comparison, and the OD value ratio of TPX2 and β-actin referred to TPX2 protein relative expression. By combining markers, it was confirmed that the bands between a molecular weight of 100 and 43 kDa were TPX2 protein and β-actin (Fig. 1). It was observed that TPX2 was expressed in the four types of breast cancer cells but not expressed in the normal cells. This experiment compared the detected OD values with image scanning and analyzing software and conducted statistical processing. Table I shows that TPX2 protein expression in four types of breast cancer cells was significantly higher than that in normal cells (0.003±0.001), but TPX2 protein expression between each pair of breast cancer cells had no statistical significance (P>0.05).
Figure 1.

Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) expression in different breast cancer cells.

Table I.

TPX2 protein relative expression in four types of breast cancer cells (mean ± SD).

VariablesNormal cellBcap37MCF7SKBR3MDAMB231
TPX2 (OD)0.028±0.0120.318±0.0230.377±0.0190.373±0.0180.374±0.022
β-actin (OD)0.93±0.130.89±0.110.93±0.220.95±0.130.97±0.21
Relative expression0.003±0.001[a]0.357±0.043[b]0.406±0.093[b]0.393±0.025[b]0.386±0.036[b]

In one-way ANOVA among groups, the same letter indicated (P>0.05) no statistical significance; different letters indicated (P<0.05) statistical significance. Same below. TPX2, targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2.

Detection of TPX2 mRNA expression in different breast cancer cells by RT-PCR

TPX2 mRNA expression in Bcap37, MCF7, SKBR3 and MDAMB231 was detected by RT-PCR. Normal breast cells were used for comparison, and OD value ratio of TPX2 and GAPDH referred to TPX2 gene expression. It is clear from Fig. 2 that TPX2 mRNA expression was similar to its protein expression in that it was expressed in the four types of breast cancer cells but not expressed in the normal cells. This experiment compared the detected OD values with image scanning and analyzing software and statistical processing was conducted. The TPX2 mRNA expression (Table II) in the four types of breast cancer cells (0.536±0.039 on average) was significantly higher than that in normal cells (0.005±0.002), but TPX2 mRNA expression between each pair of breast cancer cells had no statistical significance (P>0.05).
Figure 2.

Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) mRNA expression in different breast cancer cells.

Table II.

TPX mRNA expression in different breast cancer cells (mean ± SD).

VariablesNormal cellsBcap37MCF7SKBR3MDAMB231
TPX2 (OD)0.004±0.0120.464±0.0340.520±0.0280.478±0.0170.499±0.052
GAPDH (OD)0.86±0.110.84±0.180.90±0.280.93±0.150.89±0.17
Relative expression0.005±0.002[a]0.553±0.023[b]0.578±0.091[b]0.514±0.033[b]0.561±0.062[b]

In one-way ANOVA among groups, the same letter indicated (P>0.05) no statistical significance; different letters indicated (P<0.05) statistical significance. TPX2, targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2.

Detection of TPX2 expression in breast cancer cells at various differentiation stages by western blot analysis

TPX2 expression in breast cancer cells at the various differentiation stages was detected by western blot analysis to investigate TPX2 protein changes in the development of breast cancer cells. Experimental results are shown in Fig. 3. The results showed that TPX2 protein expression at stages I–IV was significantly increased along with the increased of differentiation stages.
Figure 3.

Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) mRNA expression in breast cancer cells at different clinical stages.

Investigation on radiotherapy effects on three types of broad-spectrum sensitizers

In the present study, in comparison to the control group, docetaxel and lovastatin produced less effect on breast cancer cells confirming that cytotoxicity of the two compounds was not strong. However, β-santalene between two groups had no significant differences, reflecting its strong cytotoxicity. Furthermore, lovastatin had the strongest effects. By comparing three kinds of sensitizers, it was observed that lovastatin had little cytotoxicity but obvious radiotherapy improving effects; thus, it is a relatively reasonable radiotherapy sensitizer on breast cancer cells. As a result, lovastatin was chosen to investigate the effects of different concentration on breast cancer cells (Tables III and IV).
Table III.

Comparison of radiotherapy effects of three types of broad-spectrum sensitizers on breast cancer stem cells (cell apoptosis rate, %; mean ± SD).

GroupsDocetaxelLovastatinβ-santalene
A (control)  0.5±0.02  0.7±0.05  0.4±0.03
B (adding medicine)  0.6±0.12  0.3±0.11  3.3±0.08
C (radiotherapy)15.2±0.22[a,b]21.3±1.21[a,b]  6.9±0.52[a,b]
D (radiotherapy and adding medicine)18.5±1.11[ac]33.2±2.10[ac]11.3±1.15[ac]

Compared with group A, P<0.05

compared with group B, P<0.05

compared with group C, P<0.05.

Table IV.

Comparison of radiotherapy effects of lovastatin at different concentrations on breast cancer stem cells (concentration, mg/l; cell apoptosis rate, %; mean ± SD).

Concentrations (mg/l)

Groups10152025304050
C (radiotherapy)21.5±1.2119.6±1.4222.8±1.1118.1±1.3219.4±1.4720.8±2.0120.2±1.96
D (radiotherapy and adding medicine)25.4±2.12[a]30.4±2.31[a]35.6±2.51[a]38.7±2.12[a]38.9±1.58[a]37.8±2.45[a]38.2±2.66[a]

Compared with group C, P<0.05.

Immunohistochemical results of different groups

Cells undergoing various processing were used as research subjects, and TPX2 protein expression in the cells of different groups were detected by immunohistochemistry. Fig. 4A shows that TPX2 protein-positive rate of breast cancer cells processed by 25 mg/l lovastatin were significantly lower than that of normal cancer cells. Counting results of positive cells (Fig. 4B) indicated that TPX2 protein positive rate of breast cancer cells processed by 25 mg/l lovastatin was 23.6%, while TPX2 protein-positive rate of breast cancer cells in the control group was 89.5%. Thus, processing with 25 mg/l lovastatin improved radiotherapy sensitization significantly.
Figure 4.

Immunohistochemical staining of targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) in different groups. (A) Immunohistochemical results. TPX2-negative cells are blue; TPX2-positive cells are brown. (B) Counting results of TPX2-positive cells undergoing various processing. *P<0.05, compared with ‘none’ group.

Discussion

As living standards improve and dietary habits change, a significant rise in the incidence of breast cancer has been recorded. Although theories on tumor stem cells have improved knowledge on tumor cells, findings suggest new medical directions (18). Breast cancer is a malignant tumor and there is a possibility that incidence and cell migration may occur following surgery. Therefore, treatment methods for breast cancer have no obvious improvement yet, and it is imperative that new treatment initiatives are identified. Advances in life sciences with regard to treating cancer based on genetics has gradually become a research focus (19). TPX2 gene is a microtubule-associated protein, and research in recent years has shown that it is closely related with the development of multiple cancer cells (20) including breast cancer. Further, radiotherapy has the ability to inhibit cancer cell proliferation but is very cytotoxic. Therefore, seeking a TPX2 gene-targeted compound sensitizer for radiotherapy on breast cancer may be an effective curative method that could alleviate associated side effects. In the present study, we first explored the relationship between TPX2 gene and breast cancer cells, then used three broad-spectrum sensitizers to conduct radiotherapy in vitro to identify the interactive relations between sensitizer and TPX2 gene (21). By analyzing the relationship between TPX2 gene and breast cancer cells, using western blot analysis and RT-PCR, the present study revealed that TPX2 gene and protein were hardly expressed in normal breast cells but were expressed significantly more in all four types of breast cancer cells. However, expressions in various breast cancer cells were not significantly different. It showed that if TPX2 gene and protein were detected in breast cells, malignant pathological changes could probably exist. This experiment also investigated TPX2 protein expression in breast cancer cells at various differentiation stages and found that TPX2 protein expression increased significantly along with the increase in differentiation stages, which further indicated TPX2 gene is closely related to the development and deteriorating severity of breast tumor cells. Moreover, monitoring TPX2 gene expression in tumor tissues could evaluate tumor severity and prove useful in the prediction and prognostic treatment of the disease. After confirming the relationship between TPX2 gene and breast cancer stem cells, the present study selected three kinds of broad-spectrum sensitizers, docetaxel, lovastatin and β-santalene in threatment with breast cancer cells by conducting radiotherapy in vitro. This experiment compared three kinds of sensitizers and found that docetaxel and lovastatin had little cytotoxicity when no radiotherapy was conducted, while lovastatin had the strongest sensitizing effects and the highest cell apoptotic rate. Therefore, lovastatin was chosen as the sensitizer of radiotherapy for breast cancer. Further effects of lovastatin at different concentrations on radiotherapy were investigated and it was found that the cell apoptotic rate was the highest at 25 mg/l concentration. Since association between TPX2 gene and breast tumor stem cells have been confirmed and lovastatin has significant sensitizing radiotherapy effects on breast tumor stem cells, our research group suspected that lovastatin affects TPX2 gene expression to increase the death rate of cancer cells. However, further investigation is required.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic plasmid DNA versus siRNA delivery: common and different tasks for synthetic carriers.

Authors:  Claudia Scholz; Ernst Wagner
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2004: based on data from 14 population-based cancer registries in the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project.

Authors:  Tomohiro Matsuda; Tomomi Marugame; Ken-ichi Kamo; Kota Katanoda; Wakiko Ajiki; Tomotaka Sobue
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors: a comparison of volunteers and non-volunteers.

Authors:  Miri Cohen; Maya Numa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Implication of galectin-3 in Wnt signaling.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shimura; Yukinori Takenaka; Tomoharu Fukumori; Soichi Tsutsumi; Kohji Okada; Victor Hogan; Akira Kikuchi; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Avraham Raz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Galectin-3--a jack-of-all-trades in cancer.

Authors:  Anna U Newlaczyl; Lu-Gang Yu
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Examining the links between perceived impact of breast cancer and psychosocial adjustment: the buffering role of posttraumatic growth.

Authors:  Sónia Martins Silva; Helena Cruz Moreira; Maria Cristina Canavarro
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2.

Authors:  Sabine Petry; Aaron C Groen; Keisuke Ishihara; Timothy J Mitchison; Ronald D Vale
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries?

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Zhen-Zhou Shen; Tse-Jia Liu; Gaurav Agarwal; Tomoo Tajima; Nam-Sun Paik; Kerstin Sandelin; Anna Derossis; Hiram Cody; William D Foulkes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Assessing associations between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ignacio Blanco; Karoline Kuchenbaecker; Daniel Cuadras; Xianshu Wang; Daniel Barrowdale; Gorka Ruiz de Garibay; Pablo Librado; Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia; Julio Rozas; Núria Bonifaci; Lesley McGuffog; Vernon S Pankratz; Abul Islam; Francesca Mateo; Antoni Berenguer; Anna Petit; Isabel Català; Joan Brunet; Lidia Feliubadaló; Eva Tornero; Javier Benítez; Ana Osorio; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Heli Nevanlinna; Kristiina Aittomäki; Banu K Arun; Amanda E Toland; Beth Y Karlan; Christine Walsh; Jenny Lester; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Robert L Nussbaum; Irene L Andrulis; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson; Timothy R Rebbeck; Rosa B Barkardottir; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Katarzyna Durda; Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek; Kathleen Claes; Tom Van Maerken; Orland Díez; Thomas V Hansen; Lars Jønson; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Bent Ejlertsen; Miguel de la Hoya; Trinidad Caldés; Alison M Dunning; Clare Oliver; Elena Fineberg; Margaret Cook; Susan Peock; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Chris Jacobs; Gabriella Pichert; Fiona Lalloo; Carol Chu; Huw Dorkins; Joan Paterson; Kai-Ren Ong; Manuel R Teixeira; Frans B L Hogervorst; Annemarie H van der Hout; Caroline Seynaeve; Rob B van der Luijt; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Peter Devilee; Juul T Wijnen; Matti A Rookus; Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer; Marinus J Blok; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Cora M Aalfs; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Kelly-Anne A Phillips; Marion Piedmonte; Stacy R Nerenstone; Victoria L Bae-Jump; David M O'Malley; Elena S Ratner; Rita K Schmutzler; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Kerstin Rhiem; Christoph Engel; Alfons Meindl; Nina Ditsch; Norbert Arnold; Hansjoerg J Plendl; Dieter Niederacher; Christian Sutter; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Doris Steinemann; Sabine Preisler-Adams; Karin Kast; Raymonda Varon-Mateeva; Andrea Gehrig; Anders Bojesen; Inge Sokilde Pedersen; Lone Sunde; Uffe Birk Jensen; Mads Thomassen; Torben A Kruse; Lenka Foretova; Paolo Peterlongo; Loris Bernard; Bernard Peissel; Giulietta Scuvera; Siranoush Manoukian; Paolo Radice; Laura Ottini; Marco Montagna; Simona Agata; Christine Maugard; Jacques Simard; Penny Soucy; Andreas Berger; Anneliese Fink-Retter; Christian F Singer; Christine Rappaport; Daphne Geschwantler-Kaulich; Muy-Kheng Tea; Georg Pfeiler; Esther M John; Alex Miron; Susan L Neuhausen; Mary Beth Terry; Wendy K Chung; Mary B Daly; David E Goldgar; Ramunas Janavicius; Cecilia M Dorfling; Elisabeth J van Rensburg; Florentia Fostira; Irene Konstantopoulou; Judy Garber; Andrew K Godwin; Edith Olah; Steven A Narod; Gad Rennert; Shani Shimon Paluch; Yael Laitman; Eitan Friedman; Annelie Liljegren; Johanna Rantala; Marie Stenmark-Askmalm; Niklas Loman; Evgeny N Imyanitov; Ute Hamann; Amanda B Spurdle; Sue Healey; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Josef Herzog; David Margileth; Chiara Gorrini; Manel Esteller; Antonio Gómez; Sergi Sayols; Enrique Vidal; Holger Heyn; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Melanie Léoné; Laure Barjhoux; Marion Fassy-Colcombet; Antoine de Pauw; Christine Lasset; Sandra Fert Ferrer; Laurent Castera; Pascaline Berthet; François Cornelis; Yves-Jean Bignon; Francesca Damiola; Sylvie Mazoyer; Olga M Sinilnikova; Christopher A Maxwell; Joseph Vijai; Mark Robson; Noah Kauff; Marina J Corines; Danylko Villano; Julie Cunningham; Adam Lee; Noralane Lindor; Conxi Lázaro; Douglas F Easton; Kenneth Offit; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Fergus J Couch; Antonis C Antoniou; Miguel Angel Pujana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular mechanism of Aurora A kinase autophosphorylation and its allosteric activation by TPX2.

Authors:  Adelajda Zorba; Vanessa Buosi; Steffen Kutter; Nadja Kern; Francesco Pontiggia; Young-Jin Cho; Dorothee Kern
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Bioinformatic analysis of direct protein targets of aspirin against human breast cancer proliferation].

Authors:  Xingmei Zhu; Jiani Yang; Enhu Zhang; Wei Qiao; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-10-30

2.  Prognostic Prediction Using a Stemness Index-Related Signature in a Cohort of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowei Chen; Dawei Zhang; Fei Jiang; Yan Shen; Xin Li; Xueju Hu; Pingmin Wei; Xiaobing Shen
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-09-04

3.  Key Genes and Prognostic Analysis in HER2+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yujie Weng; Wei Liang; Yucheng Ji; Zhongxian Li; Rong Jia; Ying Liang; Pengfei Ning; Yingqi Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  High nuclear TPX2 expression correlates with TP53 mutation and poor clinical behavior in a large breast cancer cohort, but is not an independent predictor of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Daniel R Matson; Ryan A Denu; Lauren M Zasadil; Mark E Burkard; Beth A Weaver; Christopher Flynn; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  TPX2 Promotes Metastasis and Serves as a Marker of Poor Prognosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Fang Zhou; Meng Wang; Mijiti Aibaidula; Zhiguo Zhang; Abudusaimaiti Aihemaiti; Rezhake Aili; Hao Chen; Shuangfeng Dong; Wei Wei; Abulizi Maimaitiaili
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-04

6.  Comprehensive analysis of transcriptome data stemness indices identifies key genes for controlling cancer stem cell characteristics in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xinxin Xia; Yuejun Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.