| Literature DB >> 28788615 |
Angelo Petriccione1,2, Mauro Zarrelli3, Vincenza Antonucci4, Michele Giordano5.
Abstract
Confinement and surface effects provided by nanoparticles have been shown to produce changes in polymer molecules affecting their macroscopic viscosity. Nanoparticles may induce rearrangements in polymer conformation with an increase in free volume significantly lowering the viscosity. This phenomenon is generally attributed to the selective adsorption of the polymer high molar mass fraction onto nanoparticles surface when the polymer radius of gyration is comparable to the nanoparticles characteristic dimensions. Carbon nanotubes seem to be the ideal candidate to induce viscosity reduction of polymer due to both their high surface-to-volume ratio and their nanometric sizes, comparable to the gyration radius of polymer chains. However, the amount of nanotube in a polymer system is limited by the percolation threshold as, above this limit, the formation of a nanotubes network hinders the viscosity reduction effect. Based on these findings, we have used multiwalled carbon nanotubes MWCNT "aggregates" as viscosity reducers. Our results reveal both that the use of nanotube clusters reduce significantly the viscosity of the final system and strongly increase the nanotube limiting concentration for viscosity hindering. By using hydroxyl and carboxyl functionalized nanotubes, this effect has been rather maximized likely due to the hydrogen bridged stabilization of nanotube aggregates.Entities:
Keywords: critical volume fraction; functionalized; nanotubes; viscosity reducers
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788615 PMCID: PMC5453357 DOI: 10.3390/ma7043251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1.Complex viscosity of n-EPO suspensions compared to neat resin.
Figure 2.Complex viscosity of h-EPO suspensions compared to neat resin.
Figure 3.Complex viscosity of c-EPO suspensions compared to neat resin.
Figure 4.Plateau complex viscosities. Comparison between pristine and functionalized MWCNTs at various weight contents.
Figure 5.Optical microscopy images of n-EPO samples.
Figure 6.Optical microscopy images of h-EPO and c-EPO samples.
Figure 7.Glass transition temperature for prepared nanocomposites compared to neat polymer Tg.