| Literature DB >> 28788610 |
Choonghyun Kang1, Minoru Kunieda2.
Abstract
Micro cracks occurring in concrete around tensile rebar is well known latent damage phenomenon. These micro cracks develop, and can be detected after reaching the surface of the concrete. Detection of these cracks before they are fully formed is preferable, but observing the whole crack structure is difficult. Another problem is repairing micro cracks under the concrete surface. The autogenous ability of bond cracks along rebar was evaluated using the air permeability test. Air permeability coefficients were measured before and after tensile loading, and experimental air permeability coefficients became larger near cracks along rebar as a result of tensile loading. Recuring for 28 days after tensile loading made the air permeability coefficients smaller, but this restriction only occurred during water recuring. Observation of crack patterns helped the understanding of change in the air permeability coefficients. Several small cracks along rebar were observed after tensile loading, and most cracks along rebar were not found after water recuring. On the other hand, the crack pattern did not change after air recuring. These results indicate that bond cracks along rebar can be closed by autogenous healing, and cause the air permeability coefficients.Entities:
Keywords: air permeability test; autogenous healing; bond cracks; crack pattern; ink injection
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788610 PMCID: PMC5453338 DOI: 10.3390/ma7043136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1.Shape of specimen.
Mix proportions.
| Case | W/C (%) | s/a (%) | Unit Content (kg·m−3) | Admixture (cc·m−3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Water | Cement | Sand | Gravel | Fly Ash | AEA † | |||
| Normal Concrete | 45 | 47 | 170 | 377 | 780 | 903 | – | 0.97 |
| Fly ash Concrete | 45 | 47 | 170 | 377 | 716 | 903 | 58 | 0.97 |
AEA †: Air entraining agent.
Figure 2.Experimental setup and load-displacement relationship.
Figure 3.Torrent Permeability Tester.
Figure 4.Conceptual diagram of the chamber and air flow.
Figure 5.Difference in the air permeability coefficient between loading and unloaded condition.
Figure 6.Measurement points in the air permeability test.
Figure 7.Slits in rebar for ink injection.
Figure 8.Experimental procedures.
Figure 9.Normal concrete air permeability test results. (a) Recuring in air; (b) Recuring in water—Specimen No.1; (c) Recuring in water—Specimen No.2.
Figure 10.Fly ash concrete air permeability test results. (a) Recuring in air; (b) Recuring in water—Spceimen No.1; (c) Recuring in water—Specimen No.2.
Figure 11.Observed crack patterns.