| Literature DB >> 28788522 |
Seok-Joon Jang1, Keitetsu Rokugo2, Wan-Shin Park3, Hyun-Do Yun4.
Abstract
This paper provides experimental results to investigate the mechanical properties of sustainable strain-hardening cement composite (2SHCC) for infrastructures after freeze-thaw actions. To improve the sustainability of SHCC materials in this study, high energy-consumptive components-silica sand, cement, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers-in the conventional SHCC materials are partially replaced with recycled materials such as recycled sand, fly ash, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers, respectively. To investigate the mechanical properties of green SHCC that contains recycled materials, the cement, PVA fiber and silica sand were replaced with 10% fly ash, 25% PET fiber, and 10% recycled aggregate based on preliminary experimental results for the development of 2SHCC material, respectively. The dynamic modulus of elasticity and weight for 2SHCC material were measured at every 30 cycles of freeze-thaw. The effects of freeze-thaw cycles on the mechanical properties of sustainable SHCC are evaluated by conducting compressive tests, four-point flexural tests, direct tensile tests and prism splitting tests after 90, 180, and 300 cycles of rapid freeze-thaw. Freeze-thaw testing was conducted according to ASTM C 666 Procedure A. Test results show that after 300 cycles of freezing and thawing actions, the dynamic modulus of elasticity and mass loss of damaged 2SHCC were similar to those of virgin 2SHCC, while the freeze-thaw cycles influence mechanical properties of the 2SHCC material except for compressive behavior.Entities:
Keywords: compressive behavior; direct tensile behavior; flexural behavior; freeze-thaw; splitting tensile strength; strain-hardening cement composite (SHCC); sustainable material
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788522 PMCID: PMC5453078 DOI: 10.3390/ma7021422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Mix proportion of sustainable strain-hardening cement composite (2SHCC).
| Specified Strength (MPa) | W/B (%) | Unit weight (kg/m3)
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | Cement | Fly ash | Silica sand | Recycled sand | MC | SP | Fiber
| |||
| PVA | PET | |||||||||
| 40 | 45 | 444 | 888 | 98 | 355 | 39.00 | 0.53 | 6.91 | 19.20 | 5.05 |
Figure 1.Test specimen and apparatus for direct tension. (a) geometry of tensile specimen (unit: mm); (b) test set-up.
Figure 2.Splitting test specimen and apparatus for bond strength. (a) splitting tensile specimen; (b) test set-up.
Figure 3.Freeze-thaw resistance of 2SHCC material. (a) relative dynamic modulus of elasticity; (b) mass loss.
Compressive strength (fcu) of 2SHCC material (unit: MPa).
| Specimen No. | Virgin 2SHCC
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 days | 74 days | ||
| 1 | 39.7 | 45.7 | |
| 2 | 36.6 | 46.9 | |
| 3 | 37.3 | 46.2 | |
| Mean | 37.9 | 46.3 | |
| Standard deviation | 1.63 | 0.60 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 39.0 | 36.7 | 38.8 |
| 2 | 41.3 | 31.7 | 36.3 |
| 3 | 38.7 | 37.8 | 36.0 |
| Mean | 39.7 | 35.4 | 37.0 |
| Standard deviation | 1.42 | 3.25 | 1.54 |
Figure 4.Typical compressive stress-strain curves of 2SHCC cylinders.
Figure 5.Compressive characteristics of sustainable and conventional SHCC cylinder. (a) compressive strength ratio; (b) static modulus of elasticity ratio.
Figure 6.Typical flexural responses of 2SHCC prisms.
Figure 7.Typical tensile responses of 2SHCC dumbbell-shaped specimens.
Tensile strength (ft) of 2SHCC material.
| Specimen No. | 0 cycle (28-day) | 180 cycles | 300 cycles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| First cracking strength (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Tensile strain capacity (%) | Initial crack strength (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Tensile strain capacity (%) | Initial crack strength (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Tensile strain capacity (%) | |
| 1 | 3.18 | 4.34 | 0.20 | 1.01 | 2.17 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 2.40 | 0.65 |
| 2 | 3.69 | 4.85 | 0.30 | 1.01 | 2.54 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 2.47 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 3.98 | 4.85 | 0.25 | 1.88 | 2.61 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 2.54 | 0.35 |
| 4 | 3.11 | 5.14 | 0.17 | 1.89 | 2.98 | 1.02 | 0.79 | 2.47 | 0.45 |
| 5 | 3.11 | 4.63 | 0.10 | 2.01 | 3.48 | 1.52 | 1.45 | 3.12 | 0.55 |
| Mean | 3.41 | 4.76 | 0.20 | 1.56 | 2.76 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 2.60 | 0.57 |
| Standard deviation | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.19 |
Figure 8.Typical splitting tensile stress versus opening displacement of splitting prisms.
Splitting tensile strength(fsp) of 2SHCC material (unit: MPa).
| Specimen No. | Virgin 2SHCC
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 days | 74 days | ||
| 1 | 2.81 | 2.37 | |
| 2 | 2.79 | 2.12 | |
| 3 | 2.41 | 2.28 | |
| 4 | 2.35 | 2.22 | |
| Mean | 2.59 | 2.25 | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.21 | 0.09 | |
| COV, % | 8.10 | 4.00 | |
| 1.00 | 0.87 | ||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 1.83 | 1.67 | 1.19 |
| 2 | 2.02 | 2.13 | 1.93 |
| 3 | 1.62 | 1.76 | 1.77 |
| 4 | 2.02 | 1.58 | 2.43 |
| Mean | 1.87 | 1.83 | 1.83 |
| Standard deviation | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.44 |
| COV, % | 9.09 | 18.8 | 24.0 |
| 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | |
Figure 9.Measured splitting tensile strength of composite prisms.