| Literature DB >> 28788412 |
Ramona Cosmina Hadarig1, Maria Elena de Cos Gomez2, Fernando Las-Heras3.
Abstract
The design of a novel band-pass filter with narrow-band features based on an electromagnetic resonator at 6.4 GHz is presented. A prototype is manufactured and characterized in terms of transmission and reflection coefficient. The selective passband and suppression of the second harmonic make the filter suitable to be used in a C band frequency range for radar systems and satellite/terrestrial applications. To avoid substantial interference for this kind of applications, passive components with narrow band features and small dimensions are required. Between 3.6 GHz and 4.2 GHz the band-pass filter with harmonic suppression should have an attenuation of at least 35 dB, whereas for a passband, less than 10% is sufficient.Entities:
Keywords: artificial magnetic conductor; band-pass filter; dispersion diagram; second harmonic suppression; transmission coefficient
Year: 2013 PMID: 28788412 PMCID: PMC5452756 DOI: 10.3390/ma6125613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Unit-cell resonator. The applied boundary conditions with the irreducible Brillouin triangle; and (b) Dispersion diagram of the periodic structure.
Figure 2Layout of the band-pass filter (BPF) with its characteristic circuit model.
Figure 3(a) Simulation vs. measurement: Transmission coefficient of the BPF; (b) Simulation vs. measurement: Reflection coefficient of the BPF.
Simulated band-pass filter quality factor.
| Prototype | 3 dB | BW(3 dB) | Q | Size (mm × mm) | Size (mm × mm) | |||
| GHz | % | |||||||
| BPF | 6.25 | 6.62 | 6.44 | 0.37 | 5.57 | 17.40 | 29.80 × 11.52 * | 11.92 × 11.52 |
| 3-cells-oy BPF | 6.45 | 6.61 | 6.52 | 0.16 | 2.45 | 40.75 | 29.80 × 34.56 * | 11.92 × 34.56 |
| 3-cells-ox BPF | 6.55 | 6.67 | 6.62 | 0.12 | 1.81 | 55.16 | 52.84 ×11.52* | 34.96 × 11.52 |
| Square BPF | 6.13 | 7.30 | 6.70 | 1.17 | 17.4 | 5.72 | 29.80 ×11.52* | 11.92 × 11.52 |
* Considering the input/output feeding lines.
Figure 4(a) S21 simulation results; and (b) S11 simulation results.
Figure 5(a) Topology of defected ground structures (DGS) section (bottom view); and (b) transmission coefficient of DGS section.
Figure 6Parametric analysis of the DGS.
Figure 7Manufactured prototype band-pass filter with second harmonic suppression (BPF-DGS) (a) top view; (b) bottom view; and (c) cross-section view.
Figure 8(a) S21 simulation and measurement results; and (b) S11 simulation and measurement results.
Comparison with other band-pass filters.
| Prototype | 3 dB | BW(3 dB) | Q | Size (mm × mm) | Size λ—wavelength at the corresp. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHz | % | |||||||
| BPF | 6.25 | 6.62 | 6.44 | 0.37 | 5.75 | 17.40 | 29.8 × 11.52 * | 0.63λ × 0.25λ * |
| 11.92 × 11.52 | 0.25λ × 0.25λ | |||||||
| BPF-DGS | 6.23 | 6.40 | 6.33 | 0.17 | 2.76 | 36.38 | 29.8 × 11.52 | 0.63λ × 0.25λ |
| [ | 5.46 | 5.84 | 5.65 | 0.38 | 6.72 | 14.80 | 46.2 × 11.5 | 0.87λ × 0.21λ |
| [ | 5.58 | 5.83 | 5.71 | 0.25 | 4.46 | 22.80 | 40 × 10 | 0.76λ × 0.19λ |
| [ | 5.39 | 6.02 | 5.71 | 0.63 | 11.14 | 9.06 | 40 × 10 | 0.76λ × 0.19λ |
| [ | 5.88 | 6.12 | 6 | 0.24 | 4.05 | 25 | 15 × 13 | 0.3λ × 0.26λ |
| [ | 6.63 | 6.96 | 6.8 | 0.33 | 4.9 | 20.6 | 20 × 22 | 0.45λ × 0.5λ |
| [ | 5.09 | 5.35 | 5.25 | 0.26 | 4.9 | 20.2 | 45 × 14 | 0.79λ × 0.25λ |
| [ | 5.14 | 5.38 | 5.25 | 0.24 | 4.57 | 21.8 | 19.8 × 17.9 | 0.35λ× 0.31λ |
| [ | 4.78 | 5.61 | 5.2 | 0.83 | 16 | 6.26 | 26.3 × 9.9 | 0.45λ × 0.17λ |
| [ | 5.54 | 5.86 | 5.7 | 0.32 | 5.6 | 17.81 | 26 × 8 | 0.5λ × 0.15λ |
| [ | 1.36 | 1.49 | 1.42 | 0.13 | 9 | 10.9 | 22.14 × 5.08 | 0.1λ × 0.023λ |
| [ | 2.84 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1.36 | 40 | 2.5 | 20 × 15 | 0.22λ × 0.17λ |
* Considering the input/output feeding lines.