| Literature DB >> 28788359 |
Josep Lluís Vilaplana1, Francisco Javier Baeza2, Oscar Galao3, Emilio Zornoza4, Pedro Garcés5.
Abstract
In recent years, several researchers have shown the good performance of alkali activated slag cement and concretes. Besides their good mechanical properties and durability, this type of cement is a good alternative to Portland cements if sustainability is considered. Moreover, multifunctional cement composites have been developed in the last decades for their functional applications (self-sensing, EMI shielding, self-heating, etc.). In this study, the strain and damage sensing possible application of carbon fiber reinforced alkali activated slag pastes has been evaluated. Cement pastes with 0, 0.29 and 0.58 vol % carbon fiber addition were prepared. Both carbon fiber dosages showed sensing properties. For strain sensing, function gage factors of up to 661 were calculated for compressive cycles. Furthermore, all composites with carbon fibers suffered a sudden increase in their resistivity when internal damages began, prior to any external signal of damage. Hence, this material may be suitable as strain or damage sensor.Entities:
Keywords: alkaline cement; carbon fibers; damage sensing; multifunctional composites; strain sensing
Year: 2013 PMID: 28788359 PMCID: PMC5452839 DOI: 10.3390/ma6104776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Carbon fiber PANEX 35 properties.
| Property | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter | 7.2 | µm |
| Length | 3.5 | mm |
| Carbon content | 95 | % |
| Tensile strength | 3800 | MPa |
| Elastic modulus | 242 | GPa |
| Resistivity | 1.52 × 10−3 | Ω·cm |
| Density | 1.81 | g/cm3 |
Figure 1Electrical contacts: 1 and 2 are for current input; 3 and 4 for voltage measurement.
Electrical resistance and resistivity values for different carbon fibers (CF) dosage by BFS mass.
| CF mass % | CF vol % | Resistance (Ohm) | Resistivity (Ohm·cm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 5.06 × 103 | 10.1·× 103 |
| 0.38% | 0.29% | 48.93 | 97.86 |
| 0.76% | 0.58% | 4.98 | 9.95 |
Figure 2Resistivity and longitudinal strain data versus time for different samples of a BFS composite with 0.76% CF (by BFS mass). Loading rate was 200 N/s in all tests, and the maximum compressive stress was change between tests.
Figure 3Effect of carbon fiber addition: resistivity and strain versus time for a 5 MPa test and (A) 0.29 CF vol %; (B) 0.58 CF vol %; (C) Fractional change of resistance vs. longitudinal strain for 20 loading-unloading cycles tests, also linear regression functions are represented.
Figure 4Fractional change of resistance and longitudinal strain versus time until materials failure for different CF additions: (A) 0.29 CF vol %; (B) 0.58 CF vol %. The shaded area corresponds to the damage sensing mechanism activation.