| Literature DB >> 28788186 |
Mi-Kyung Han1, Moon-Jin Hwang2, Dae-Hee Won3, Yang-Soo Kim4, Ho-Jun Song5, Yeong-Joon Park6.
Abstract
In order to investigate the relationship between phase/microstructure and various properties of Ti-xAg alloys, a series of Ti-xAg alloys with Ag contents ranging from 5 to 20 wt% were prepared. The microstructures were characterized using X-ray diffractometry (XRD), optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All of the Ti-xAg alloys showed a massive transformation from the β-Ti to αm phase, which has a different crystal structure from that of the matrix phase, but it has the same composition as the matrix α-Ti phase. As a result of solid-solution strengthening of α-Ti and massive transformation phase, the Ti-xAg showed better mechanical properties than the commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti). Electrochemical results showed that the Ti-xAg alloys exhibited improved corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance than cp-Ti.Entities:
Keywords: artificial neural network; attribute reduction; fuzzy information entropy; medical costs estimation; myocardial infarction disease
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788186 PMCID: PMC5456133 DOI: 10.3390/ma7096194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffractometry (XRD) patterns of the cast commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) and the series of binary Ti–xAg (Ti–x wt% Ag) alloys. (a) cp-Ti; (b) Ti–5Ag; (c) Ti–10Ag; (d) Ti–15Ag; and (e) Ti–20Ag.
Figure 2(a,b) Lattice parameters (a and c) of cp-Ti and as-cast Ti–xAg alloys and (c) the variation in the ratio (c/a) of lattice parameters.
Figure 3Optical micrographs of Ti–xAg alloys; (a) Ti–5Ag; (b) Ti–10Ag; (c) Ti–15Ag; and (d) Ti–20Ag.
Figure 4TEM micrographs of Ti–xAg alloys; (a) Ti–5Ag; (b) Ti–10Ag; (c) Ti–15Ag; and (d) Ti–20Ag.
Figure 5(a) SEM micrograph with quantitative EDX analysis of Ti–10Ag alloy; and (b) HR-TEM micrograph with the SAED pattern of the Ti–10Ag alloy.
Figure 6Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of the cast cp-Ti and series of binary Ti–xAg alloys.
Figure 7Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of cp-Ti and Ti–xAg alloys showing various degrees of weight gain (%) by heating in air up to 795 °C and 1000 °C.
Vickers hardness and elastic modulus values of Ti–xAg alloys compared to cp-Ti (n = 5).
| Alloy Code | Vickers Hardness (VHN) | Elastic Modulus (GPa) |
|---|---|---|
| cp-Ti | 165.0 (2.6) a,* | 132.4 (12.2) b,c,* |
| Ti–5Ag | 251.7 (1.2) b | 140.4 (4.9) c |
| Ti–10 Ag | 501.0 (17.3) c | 126.4 (8.5) a,b |
| Ti–15Ag | 275.3 (11.0) b | 129.6 (7.0) a,b |
| Ti–20 Ag | 485.0 (68.4) c | 122.7 (4.6) a |
* Within the same column, mean values with the same superscript letter were not statistically different at 5% (p > 0.05) by the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 8Representative potentiodynamic polarization curves for the cp-Ti and Ti–xAg alloys. SCE, saturated calomel electrode.
Corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (icorr) of cp-Ti and Ti–xAg alloys (n = 3).
| Alloy Code | ||
|---|---|---|
| cp-Ti | −550.33 (43.94) a,* | 0.287 (0.046) a,* |
| Ti–5Ag | −471.07 (101.37) a,b | 0.209 (0.072) a |
| Ti–10Ag | −500.20 (31.82) a,b | 0.231 (0.057) a |
| Ti–15Ag | −461.33 (19.98) a,b | 0.181 (0.120) a |
| Ti–20Ag | −416.98 (58.72) b | 0.221 (0.078) a |
* Within the same column, mean values with the same superscript letter were not statistically different at 5% (p > 0.05) by the Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 9Mean values of galvanic currents vs. time of the couplings of cp-Ti/Ti–xAg alloys.